How do gay and bi teenage guys feel about g ndoms?
Contents:
- TO USE OR NOT USE CONDOMS? GAY, BI, QUEER TEEN GUYS TELL US
- WHAT’S THE BT WAY TO E PROTECTN DURG GAY SEX?
- FDA THORIZ NDOMS MA SPECIFILLY FOR GAY MAL
TO USE OR NOT USE CONDOMS? GAY, BI, QUEER TEEN GUYS TELL US
* gay use condom *
Therefore, enuragg gay, bisexual, and queer (GBQ)-intifyg teenage men to e ndoms is an important preventive step. To read our other blog posts on the same study wh GBQ teenage men, check out: Talkg Onle Can Be Life Changg for Sexual Mory Guys and Why Aren’t Gay, Bi, Queer Teen Guys Gettg Tted For HIV?
A mixed-methods study of ndom e and cisn makg among adolcent gay and bisexual mal. HIV Among Gay and Bisexual Men. Is there any specific ndom that is bt for e wh homosexual mal?
gay. Inappropriate lubrint e wh ndoms by homosexual men. Use of ndoms has been advoted as an important method of rcg the risk of human immunoficiency vis (HIV) transmissn among high-risk groups such as homosexual and bisexual men, prostut, traveno dg ers, adolcents, and hemophiliacs.
WHAT’S THE BT WAY TO E PROTECTN DURG GAY SEX?
The U.S. Food and Dg Admistratn has approved the first ever ndom ma specifilly for gay mal * gay use condom *
Dpe risk-rctn tn mpaigns directed to gay men sce the early 1980s, evince shows ntued fics ndom-e skills and knowledge among gay men. Two groups of homosexual and bisexual men were sampled, those enterg a risk-rctn tn program and participants a Gay Pri event.
The characteristics of those surveyed were siar to those of rponnts other studi of risk rctn among gay men.
Gay men sexually exclive relatnships engaged ls nsistent e of ndoms for receptive genal-anal sex than did sgle gay men. Gay Pri participants engaged sexual behavr that was relatively more risky for HIV transmissn than did the other group.
FDA THORIZ NDOMS MA SPECIFILLY FOR GAY MAL
Gay Pri participants ed ndoms ls nsistently for genal-anal sex than did the risk-rctn program fdgs dite the need for better risk rctn tn efforts directed to gay men. Contued improvement the efforts will require asssg the effectivens and nsistency of risk rctn efforts, termg the potential for gay men to relapse to more risky behavr, and intifyg gaps the knowledge of risk-rctn efforts among gay and bisexual men. Active outreach is need to gay and bisexual men who are unlikely to voluntarily enroll risk-rctn programs.