Read the US Supreme Court’s historic gay marriage cisn pla text

Contents:

• READ THE FULL SUPREME COURT CISN ON GAY MARRIAGE
• SUPREME COURT GAY MARRIAGE: FULL TEXT OF DECISN ENDG BAN ON SAME-SEX MARRIAG
• ‘IT IS SO ORRED.’ SUPREME COURT JTIC ON GAY MARRIAGE CISN
• READ THE SUPREME COURT RULG THAT REGNIZED GAY MARRIAGE NATNWI
• GAY RIGHTS VS. FREE SPEECHSUPREME COURT BACKS WEB DIGNER OPPOSED TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE
• READ THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISN ON GAY MARRIAGE HERE
• READ THE US SUPREME COURT’S HISTORIC GAY MARRIAGE CISN PLA TEXT

READ THE FULL SUPREME COURT CISN ON GAY MARRIAGE

In 1981, the San Francis Board of Supervisors passed an ordance that allowed homosexual upl and unmarried heterosexual upl to register for domtic partnership, which also granted hospal visatn rights and other benefs. Bh that would outlaw same-sex marriag the whole untry, ten typilly nservative tat along wh Oregon enacted state-level bans on gay marriag.

In 2010, Massachetts, the first state to legalize gay marriage, found Sectn 3 of DOMA that fed marriage as a unn between one man and one woman to be unnstutnal, 2013, Uned Stat v. By 2015 (the year Obergefell was cid) thirty-six stat already issued marriage licens to same-sex upl and more than 20 unti around the world had already legalized gay marriage, startg wh the Netherlands 2000. Judge Heyburn held that “homosexual persons nstute a quasi-spect class, ” and clared that Kentucky’s law banng same-sex marriag vlat the Equal Protectn Clse of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Uned Stat Constutn.

SUPREME COURT GAY MARRIAGE: FULL TEXT OF DECISN ENDG BAN ON SAME-SEX MARRIAG

The 5-4 op­n, wr­ten by Jtice An­thony Kennedy, will stand as a land­mark civil rights law and cul­m­at a two-c­a long stggle for gays and l­bi­ans to w mar­riage equal­y un­r the Con­sti­tu­tn. Supporters of gay marriage rally ont of the Supreme Court Washgton on Friday. In a historic cisn for the gay right’s movement, the Supreme Court led on Friday that the U.

Kennedy, who wrote the majory opn, said that gay and lbian upl have a fundamental right to marry.

Same-sex marriage supporters celebrate after the Supreme Court’s landmark lg on gay marriage. Gay rights supporters celebrate Friday after the U.

‘IT IS SO ORRED.’ SUPREME COURT JTIC ON GAY MARRIAGE CISN

This dynamic n be seen the Natn’s experienc wh the rights of gays and lbians. For this reason, among others, many persons did not em homosexuals to have digny their own distct inty. Even when a greater awarens of the humany and tegry of homosexual persons me the perd after World War II, the argument that gays and lbians had a jt claim to digny was nflict wh both law and wispread social nventns.

Gays and lbians were prohibed om most ernment employment, barred om ary service, exclud unr immigratn laws, targeted by police, and burned their rights to associate. For much of the 20th century, moreover, homosexualy was treated as an illns. When the Amerin Psychiatric Associatn published the first Diagnostic and Statistil Manual of Mental Disorrs 1952, homosexualy was classified as a mental disorr, a posn adhered to until 1973.

READ THE SUPREME COURT RULG THAT REGNIZED GAY MARRIAGE NATNWI

See Posn Statement on Homosexualy and Civil Rights, 1973, 131 Am.

As a rult, qutns about the rights of gays and lbians soon reached the urts, where the issue uld be discsed the formal disurse of the law. This Court first gave tailed nsiratn to the legal stat of homosexuals Bowers v.

There upheld the nstutnaly of a Geia law emed to crimalize certa homosexual acts.

GAY RIGHTS VS. FREE SPEECHSUPREME COURT BACKS WEB DIGNER OPPOSED TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE

Then, 2003, the Court overled Bowers, holdg that laws makg same-sex timacy a crime “mea[n] the liv of homosexual persons.

Most Stat have allowed gays and lbians to adopt, eher as dividuals or as upl, and many adopted and foster children have same-sex parents, see id., at 5. This provis powerful nfirmatn om the law self that gays and lbians n create lovg, supportive fai. As the State self mak marriage all the more prec by the signifince attach to , excln om that stat has the effect of teachg that gays and lbians are unequal important rpects.

It means gays and lbians for the State to lock them out of a central stutn of the Natn’s society. This Court has rejected that approach, both wh rpect to the right to marry and the rights of gays and lbians.

READ THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISN ON GAY MARRIAGE HERE

In Lawrence the Court acknowledged the terlockg nature of the nstutnal safeguards the ntext of the legal treatment of gays and lbians.

Although Lawrence elaborated s holdg unr the Due Procs Clse, acknowledged, and sought to remedy, the ntug equaly that rulted om laws makg timacy the liv of gays and lbians a crime agast the State. Lawrence therefore drew upon prcipl of liberty and equaly to fe and protect the rights of gays and lbians, holdg the State “nnot mean their existence or ntrol their sty by makg their private sexual nduct a crime.

The imposn of this disabily on gays and lbians serv to disrpect and subordate them. That approach might have been viewed as a ut endorsement of the mocratic procs, which had only jt begun to nsir the rights of gays and lbians. Yet, effect, Bowers upheld state actn that nied gays and lbians a fundamental right and ed them pa and huiatn.

READ THE US SUPREME COURT’S HISTORIC GAY MARRIAGE CISN PLA TEXT

Were the Court to stay s hand to allow slower, se-by-se termatn of the required availabily of specific public benefs to same-sex upl, still would ny gays and lbians many rights and rponsibili tertwed wh marriage. ImageLorie Smh said her Christian fah requir her to turn away ctomers seekg servic to celebrate same-sex Woolf for The New York TimThe Supreme Court sid on Friday wh a web signer Colorado who said she had a First Amendment right to refe to sign weddg webs for same-sex upl spe a state law that forbids discrimatn agast gay people. ’”The se, though amed as a clash between ee speech and gay rights, was the latt a seri of cisns favor of relig people and groups, notably nservative cisn also appeared to suggt that the rights of L.