Three stat still require people nvicted of havg gay sex prr to the Supreme Court's lg Lawrence v. Texas 2003 to register as sex offenrs.
Contents:
- BUGGERY, SODOMY AND CROSS-DRSG, OH MY: A TIMELE OF GAY CRIMALIZATN AMERI
- SODOMY LAWS THAT LABELED GAY PEOPLE SEX OFFENRS CHALLENGED URT
BUGGERY, SODOMY AND CROSS-DRSG, OH MY: A TIMELE OF GAY CRIMALIZATN AMERI
Stunt is secretly anthetized and sodomized by his gay roommate. * gay sodomy *
Lucky for gay/bi men, there are que a number of who know exactly how that feels.
It seems like every gay guy out there is a bottom, and when you thk you've met someone who's fely a He too is a bottom. A very mon argument agast anal sex among homosexuals is that there are a number of health risks volved.
The risks are prented by Christian pastors and pro-fay lears as a powerful reason to disurage people om homosexual anal sex. The risks are real and te, but not limed to homosexuals. A woman, married or not, who receiv anally a man’s penis is so vulnerable to the risks as a homosexual.
SODOMY LAWS THAT LABELED GAY PEOPLE SEX OFFENRS CHALLENGED URT
This stute is notor for s blatant advocy of homosexual acts and behavr. Probably, the Christian married men who require their wiv to subm to this kd of sex are silent the church and their Christian ttimony about risk factors of anal sex for homosexuals.
After all, what is the pot for married men who do to nmn among homosexuals if the risks are jt the same for non-homosexuals? So anal sex, by homosexuals or not, is sodomy. Stephen Goldstone, an open homosexual and thor of “The Ins and Outs of Gay Sex: A Medil Handbook for Men” (Dell: New York, 1999), said his book,.
Goldstone is an Assistant Clil Profsor of Surgery at The Mount Sai School of Medice and an expert on “gay men’s health” and “anorectal disorrs. If homosexuals serve to be warned about the health risks of sodomy, why should Christian wiv and their hbands be prived of ?