Natnal Coaln for Gay and Lbian Equaly and Others v Mister of Home Affairs and Others (CCT10/99) [1999] ZACC 17; 2000 (2) SA 1; 2000 (1) BCLR 39 (2 December 1999)

lesbian and gay equality project v minister of home affairs

Mister of Home Affairs and Another v Fourie and Another; Lbian and Gay Equaly Project and Others v Mister of Home Affairs and Others, is a landmark cisn of the Constutnal Court of South Ai which the urt led unanimoly that same-sex upl have a nstutnal right to marry. The judgment, thored by Jtice Albie Sachs and livered on 1 December 2005, gave Parliament one year to pass the necsary legislatn. As a rult, the Civil Unn Act me to force on 30 November 2006, makg South Ai the fifth untry the world to regnise same-sex marriage. The se was heard on May 17, 2005, by Langa ACJ, Madala J, Mokgoro J, Moseneke J, Ngbo J, O'Regan J, Sachs J, Skweyiya J, Yaob J and Van Der Wthuizen J. MTK Moerane SC appeared for the applints, P Oosthuizen for the rponnts, JJ Smyth QC for the first and send amici curiae, GC Pretori SC for the third amic curiae, DI Berger SC for the applints, and M Donen SC for the rponnts. In the Fourie se, the applints' unsel was stcted by the State Attorney, and the rponnts' by M. van n Berg. The third amic curiae was stcted by Motla Conradie. In the Lbian and Gay Equaly Project se, the applints' unsel was stcted by Nicholls, Cambanis & Associat, and the rponnts' by the State Attorney. The se ncerned applitns for leave to appeal and cross-appeal agast a cisn of the Supreme Court of Appeal upled wh an applitn for direct accs to the Constutnal Court .

Contents:

LBIAN AND GAY EQUALY PROJECT AND EIGHTEEN OTHERS V. MISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS

Ryan Richard Thoron, Somewhere over the Rabow Natn: Gay, Lbian and Bisexual Activism South Ai, Journal of Southern Ain Studi, Vol. 34, No. 3 (Sep., 2008), pp. 679-697 * lesbian and gay equality project v minister of home affairs *

Case CCT 10/05LESBIAN AND GAY EQUALITY PROJECTAND EIGHTEEN. applints and the gay and lbian muny but also to society at. our equaly jurispnce had taken great stris rpect of gays and.

They tablish that: gays. gays and lbians’ li the msage nveys,. gays and lbians.

gays and lbians bee impli a judgment on them.

LBIAN AND GAY EQUALY PROJECT AND EIGHTEEN OTHERS V MISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS AND OTHERS

are approved, will at their optn be able to perform gay and lbian marriag. But, he nclud, gay.

Homosexual persons are not permted. and Gay Equaly Project.

rights of lbian and gay people to:.

COHABITATION AND THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE. A COMPLEX JIGSAW PUZZLE MISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS V FOURIE; LBIAN AND GAY EQUALY PROJECT V MISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS 2006 3 BCLR 355 (CC)

and gay people to.

Are gay and lbian people unfairly. on the ground of sexual orientatn has had, and ntu to have, on gays and.

It nclud that gay men are a permanent mory. mory stat of gays and the patterns of discrimatn to which they had.

MISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS AND ANOTHER V FOURIE AND ANOTHER; LBIAN AND GAY EQUALY PROJECT AND OTHERS V MISTER

of past and ntug discrimatn agast both gays and lbians was the.

It nied to gays and lbians that which. and self-rpect of lbians and gays. )The impact of the excln of lbians and gays by.

*BEAR-MAGAZINE.COM* LESBIAN AND GAY EQUALITY PROJECT V MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS

Lbian and Gay Equaly Project and Eighteen Others v Mister of Home Affairs and Others .

TOP