Rick Brentlger Answers - Y, I do believe Matthew 19:12 scrib gays. That is even the view of some very anti-gay Christians like Dr. Robert Gagnon.
Contents:
IS J SCRIBG GAYS MATTHEW 19:12?
Rick Brentlger Answers -Y, I do believe Matthew 19:12 scrib is even the view of some very anti-gay Christians like Dr. Addnal Qutns om Tom"A gay former Catholic Prit told me that Jonathan met David bee he (Jonathan) was walkg past David's room and saw him layg naked on the bed.
"Rick's AnswerNo verse of scripture says that Jonathan was walkg past David's room and saw him lyg naked on the gay former Catholic prit you spoke to may have had 1 Samuel 18:1-3 md, where Jonathan and David ma a venant of love and exchanged clothg, which at least impli that they were naked durg the clothg is not a specific scripture which has Jonathan and David sleepg naked together out the field wh the ary. I have a number of pag on this webse about Jonathan and David which you may enjoy 's grace and blsg to you as you walk the path of His purpose for your 've answered the qutn: Is J scribg gays Matthew 19:12? Click here to return to Gay Christian 101 Home Page.
J SAID SOME ARE BORN GAY.
A send sectn of tert to gays looks at what J tght about marriage and divorce ( the procs parg a range of translatns), yieldg a possible ncln about whether someone who is gay should marry a woman. Castrated mal are not the only people clud the term ‘nuch’; there are those renred sexually active by the pa/srs of (sexual) abe (this is one of the thgs nservativ claim n e someone to bee gay; the other is poor parentg).
There n hardly be a qutn that gays fall to the nuch fn given by Christ, and Isaiah 56:4-5 offers a particularly hopeful prospect for those who keep the venant wh God. I have heard all sorts of strange explanatns of this passage, even some which would seek to e to jtify homosexualy!
J AFFIRMED A GAY UPLE.
But some apologists for homosexualy seek to twist this passage to support of their e. France stat, is of urse anachronistic to read back morn Wtern notns of homosexual orientatn to this passage. Also, back then homosexualy most often meant what we today ll bi-sexualy: primarily men who had sex wh both women and other men.
There was no thought of people beg born wh some herent, unalterable homosexual orientatn.
Sure, there will always be theologil revisnists who will seek to distort such passag orr to promote their agenda, such as the homosexual activists.