LGBTQ Rource Gui 988 LifeLe | AA of Ssex County- Southern Delaware Intergroup of AA | In-person and virtual| ACLU of DE Lbian & Gay Civil Rights Project | | 302-654-3966 AFSP | CAMP Rehoboth is a 501(c)(3) nonprof muny service anizatn dited to creatg a more posive environment Rehoboth Beach and s related muni. We seek to promote operatn and unrstandg among all people, as we work to build a safer and more clive muny wh room for all.
Contents:
- ABOUT THE CENTERSCE 1983 THE CENTER HAS BEEN SUPPORTG, FOSTERG AND CELEBRATG THE LGBT MUNY OF NEW YORK CY. FD MORE RMATN ON AND OUR WORK ABOUT THE CENTER. VIS ABOUT THE CENTEROUR MISSNCYBER CENTERCENTER HISTORYRACE EQUYMEDIA CENTERLEARSHIP & STAFFEMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNICORPORATE PARTNERSHIPSANNUAL REPORTS & FANCIAL INFORMATNCONTACT USHOURS & LOTNSEMAPSUPPORT THE CENTER
- PREP FOR GAY MEN 101: EVERYTHG GAY MEN NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TAKG HIV PREVENTN MEDITN!
- PREP-RELATED STIGMA AND PREP E AMONG GAY, BISEXUAL AND OTHER MEN WHO HAVE SEX WH MEN ONTAR AND BRISH COLUMBIA, CANADA
- THE RELEVANCE OF PRE-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS GAY MEN’S LIV AND THEIR MOTIVATNS TO E : A QUALATIVE STUDY
- ACTIVISTS NMN VLENCE AGAST LGBTQ MUNY ST. VCENT, WHERE GAY SEX IS ILLEGAL
- A GAY MAN HAS BEEN DIAGNOSED WH HIV SPE TAKG PREVENTATIVE DG PREP
- CHARL BARKLEY FENDS LGBTQIA+ MUNY, BUD LIGHT EXPLETIVE-FILLED RANT: ‘IF YOU’RE GAY, GOD BLS YOU’
- SOME GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN SEE PREP AS A 'SOCIAL PROBLEM'
- “I’M ON PREP, HBU?” – THE MEANG AND INFLUENCE OF PREP AMONG TAIWANE GAY COMMUNY
ABOUT THE CENTERSCE 1983 THE CENTER HAS BEEN SUPPORTG, FOSTERG AND CELEBRATG THE LGBT MUNY OF NEW YORK CY. FD MORE RMATN ON AND OUR WORK ABOUT THE CENTER. VIS ABOUT THE CENTEROUR MISSNCYBER CENTERCENTER HISTORYRACE EQUYMEDIA CENTERLEARSHIP & STAFFEMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNICORPORATE PARTNERSHIPSANNUAL REPORTS & FANCIAL INFORMATNCONTACT USHOURS & LOTNSEMAPSUPPORT THE CENTER
We aimed to explore the associatn between PrEP-related stereotyp and perceived disapproval (hereafter PrEP-related stigma), and PrEP e. We ed data om a cross-sectnal onle survey among adult gay, bisexual, other men who have sex wh men Ontar and Brish Columbia, Canada. Participants were reced 2019–2020 -person om sexual health clics and outreach programs, and onle through datg mobile applitns and webs. We ed logistic regrsn mols to explore the relatnship between PrEP-related stigma and: 1-beg a ‘never’ vers ‘current’ PrEP er, and 2-beg a ‘former’ vers ‘current’ er. The median age of the sample was 32 (Q1-Q3 = 27–40), most were whe born Canada (48%), 45% had never ed PrEP, 16% were former PrEP ers and 39% were current PrEP ers. Of 1527 dividuals who started the survey, 1190 participants answered qutns about PrEP-related stigma: 254 (21.3%) were classified as havg low level of PrEP-related stigma, 776 (65.2%) termediate, and 160 (13.5%) high. No signifint associatn was found when never PrEP ers and current PrEP ers were pared: adjted OR = 1.44 (95%-CI: 0.8–2.5). High PrEP-related stigma was posively associated wh beg a former PrEP er pared to beg a current PrEP er: adjted OR = 2.5 (95%-CI: 1.3–4.9). PrEP-related stigma is associated wh not g PrEP, particularly wh PrEP disntuatn. Our fdgs dite that stigma persists as a barrier to PrEP e. * prep gay community *
It was a perd of uncertaty as healthre provirs stggled to make sense of the disease that was ravagg the gay muny. The gay muny, which was already spised and margalized for the way s members chose to live and love, was an easy victim. The disease was at that pot lled GIRD (Gay-Related Immunoficiency) and everyone assumed was a punishment flicted upon gay people for livg like generat.
Even healthre profsnals discrimated agast gay men fected wh the vis, and only a handful of them took those sufferg om and sought to, at the very least, make their last days fortable. MethodsWe ed data om a cross-sectnal onle survey among adult gay, bisexual, other men who have sex wh men Ontar and Brish Columbia, Canada. 6 per 100, 000 populatn 2019, and gay, bisexual and other men who have sex wh men (GBM) rema the largt proportn of new HIV diagnos [1].
Furthermore, stigma overlaps wh HIV-related stigma, a way that fear of HIV may crease PrEP uptake as prevents dividuals om openly talkg about HIV [24]; siarly, overlaps wh homophobia, which is important bee dividuals might cle PrEP or stop g bee they may not want to be associated wh a particular sexual orientatn [24] facilate seekg and ntug e of PrEP, posive msagg om others who share the same inty (GBM, TGW), society-at-large, and stutns (e.
PREP FOR GAY MEN 101: EVERYTHG GAY MEN NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TAKG HIV PREVENTN MEDITN!
HIV has affected gay men disproportnately the U.S. for four s. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) was veloped as a preventn strategy for dividuals at high risk of HIV fectn. Although highly effective, many gay and other men who have sex wh men ntue not to take PrEP. Rearchers have foced on sexual risk behavrs as the primary termant of who should be on PrEP and intified var objective systemic and societal barriers to PrEP accs. Public health measur have promoted PrEP based on the objective creria. Rearchers have recently begun to quire to subjective and relatnal motivators for PrEP age beyond self-perceived risk. Participants were reced through snowball samplg. Data were llected between Augt and November 2018 om PrEP ers (n = 7) and PrEP non-ers (n = 6). Data were analyzed a modified ground theory qualative analysis. The thirteen participants’ narrativ ntaed three superordate tegori: (1) what ’s like to be someone on PrEP, (2) an environment of changg sexual norms, and (3) the ntued importance of tn. The tegori prised ten them, each of which had var repeatg ias. The ten them were the followg: (1) PrEP’s social acceptabily, (2) PrEP and HIV stigma, (3) PrEP and sexual relatnships, (4) dissatisfactn wh ndoms, (5) negotiatg risk, (6) peace of md, (7) velopg a relatnship wh PrEP, (8) puttg yourself first, (9) PrEP awarens, and (10) PrEP logistics. The gay men our study took to nsiratn their social rol and relatnships, their personal beliefs, and emotnal histori as well as risk as proment motivators for PrEP e. They stated that PrEP e is associated wh their sense of belongg, tst, and secury about their sexualy. They also intified the most relevant aspects of the meditn (e.g., si effects, adherence, and awarens) to their liv. * prep gay community *
Born abroad, and ethnicy: Whe, Black, Latx, East Asian, Indigeno and others (this variable was nstcted to better reprent the soccultural diversy of the study settg); (2) level of tn; (3) age years; (4) disclosure of sexual orientatn; (5) proportn of gay, bisexual and queer (GBQ) people their social work; (6) endorsg the statement “ndoms are the only tly effective form of HIV preventn; (7) beg worried about gettg STIs; (8) number of male sexual partners the past six months; and (9) clil ditn for PrEP. Such strategi n be at the dividual or at the stctural/anizatnal level, cludg: dividual-foced rmatn dissematn, empathy ductn, unsellg and gnive behavral therapy at the dividual level and; gay-affirmg, school-based terventns and riliency-foced social marketg mpaigns at the stctural level [39]. “A Gay Man and a Doctor are Jt like, a Recipe for Dtctn”: How Racism and Homonegativy Healthre Settgs Influence PrEP Uptake Among Young Black MSM.
Socmographic Characteristics of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Use and Reasons for None Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex wh Men om Three US Ci.
Stigma, gay men and bmedil preventn: the challeng and opportuni of a rapidly changg HIV preventn landspe. PrEP-related stigma and PrEP e among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex wh men Ontar and Brish Columbia, Canada.
PREP-RELATED STIGMA AND PREP E AMONG GAY, BISEXUAL AND OTHER MEN WHO HAVE SEX WH MEN ONTAR AND BRISH COLUMBIA, CANADA
A gay man has been diagnosed wh HIV spe takg preventative dg pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) daily, has been revealed. * prep gay community *
AbstractBackgroundHIV has affected gay men disproportnately the U. Although highly effective, many gay and other men who have sex wh men ntue not to take PrEP.
ConclnsThe gay men our study took to nsiratn their social rol and relatnships, their personal beliefs, and emotnal histori as well as risk as proment motivators for PrEP e.
Although highly effective, PrEP has not been highly accsed by many populatns at high risk of HIV fectn cludg gay and other men who have sex wh men (llectively GMSM) [2].
THE RELEVANCE OF PRE-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS GAY MEN’S LIV AND THEIR MOTIVATNS TO E : A QUALATIVE STUDY
Wrten by Yu-Chuan "Daniel" L. Although PrEP meditn solv the HIV epimic, rearch has found an aquate number of MSM receivg . For example, a 2015 U.S. CDC report has dited that at least one of four gay men should be takg PrEP daily to effectively avoid more extensive HIV transmissn, requirg the participatn of… * prep gay community *
We hope our study enrich extant PrEP rearch through a ground theory approach [27] via terviews of gay men who have nsired g PrEP, focg on the beliefs, feelgs, and experienc that unrgird their sense of the relevance of PrEP e to their liv that then affect whether they are motivated to e .
Eligible participants were reced by the rearchers through emails on their personal and profsnal works, through flyers at lol LGBT service centers, and through Redd msage boards “askgaybros, ” “gay, ” “SampleSize, ” “hivaids, ” and “PrEPared. ” All participants were mal who self-intified as gay, English- or Spanish-speakg, over age 18, and sexually active wh the past 6 months. Th, this project’s sample prised a largely homogeno group of Csian, highly ted, middle to upper-middle class, cis gay men, seven sgle and six some form of mted partnership.
ACTIVISTS NMN VLENCE AGAST LGBTQ MUNY ST. VCENT, WHERE GAY SEX IS ILLEGAL
U3 ( his 20s) has been an open relatnship for 2 years wh an HIV-negative gay man who is also on PrEP. 5 years wh an HIV-negative gay man. 5 years ago when he entered a sexually monogamo bond wh an HIV negative gay male partner who is not on PrEP.
U6 ( his 30s) is a sexually non-monogamo marriage wh an HIV-negative gay man who also PrEP.
N12 ( his 30s) is sexually active exclively wh his romantic partner, an HIV-negative gay man, wh the ntext of a sexually monogamo relatnship. ” By drawg the nnectn between attus towards PrEP and attus towards gay sex, U7 explicly acknowledged that PrEP e rri social meang and reprents more than jt an HIV preventn the men our study, the meang of intifyg as g PrEP extend beyond notns of belongg and muny and was related to fear and stigma associated wh sex and sexual inty. Participants (n = 7) stated that g PrEP is associated wh promiscuy and risky behavr and that PrEP stigma leads to shame and judgment of gay men who e PrEP.
A GAY MAN HAS BEEN DIAGNOSED WH HIV SPE TAKG PREVENTATIVE DG PREP
She liv a cy wh a very active gay culture.
She was surprised that there were many shame issu, and out of mted gay relatnships, about g PrEP, which ma the experience of g PrEP those participants’ relatnal world irrelevant or negatively experienced.
The -rearcher is a gay, Latx, well-ted cisgenr man. He was surprised that gay men shame and judge each other about the e of PrEP even wh timate relatnships, and that gay men nceal the relevance of PrEP om those close to them. She was surprised by our fdgs of shame and out of mted gay relatnships and the irrelevant or negative experience has on PrEP e.
CHARL BARKLEY FENDS LGBTQIA+ MUNY, BUD LIGHT EXPLETIVE-FILLED RANT: ‘IF YOU’RE GAY, GOD BLS YOU’
The rearchers hypothized that when gay men nsir g PrEP, they nsir subjective and relatnal factors over and above their self-perceived risk. In the prent study we sought to ask gay men about how risk and other factors affected their motivatns about whether to e PrEP, and how risk and PrEP were relevant to their lived experience. E., factors beyond “objective” risk of HIV fectn, gay men’s cisn to adopt or fo PrEP.
SOME GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN SEE PREP AS A 'SOCIAL PROBLEM'
Thirteen gay men shared timate tails of their liv unrstandg they would not be pensated but that their stori would ntribute to a body of rearch that aims to unrstand and help GMSM who nsir g PrEP. Participants talked about how their iends viewed PrEP differently than how they talked about the “gay world’s” attu toward PrEP.
One participant who prevly ed PrEP stated that beg on PrEP is “almost the norm wh the gay world” (N4, 20s, open relatnship, $85 k). Concern about the gay muny motivated participants to e PrEP to be “rponsible” by “dog their part” to stop the spread of HIV.
“I’M ON PREP, HBU?” – THE MEANG AND INFLUENCE OF PREP AMONG TAIWANE GAY COMMUNY
Participants’ views ranged om “It’s almost the norm to e PrEP the gay world” (N4, 20s, open relatnship, $85 k) to “I thk people jt don’t know ’s there” (U3, 20s, open relatnship, $65 k). This, too, has been supported prev lerature which participants’ skepticism of medil profsnals is a reason why they do not seek talk to their provirs about PrEP [55] men our study njectured that creasg mpaigns to promote PrEP tn, particularly on not only targetg gay men, might help crease uptake. The participants this study were largely a homogeno group primarily nsistg of young, Whe, affluent, highly ted, gay-intifyg HIV-negative cisgenr men.