Gay Beastialy is a group Send Life. Send Life is a ee 3D virtual world where ers n socialize, nnect and create g ee voice and text chat.
Contents:
WHAT ABOUT VLENT NECROPHILIAC GAY BTIALY?
* gay bestialitu *
Gay Beastialy. In a new terview, Huckabee equat homosexualy to btialy.
The reason beg that the specific laws qutn aren’t really particularly material rtrictns on ee speech (as wh the 2006 Act, the current law on homophobia has an explic clse explag that merely cril or mockg speech is not cement to hatred), and that the UK really don’t need any of the antisocial behavur that is an evable nsequence of cements to hatred. One don’t have to be an aficnado of Mr Humphri or Larry Grayson to be aware that Brish edians have at least as much of a profsnal tert the mockery of gays as they do the mockery of religns, but if there was a big edians’ prott agast this one I missed .
GAY BEAST
Opponents of homosexualy sometim argue that if homosexual sex is morally permissible then so are btialy and necrophilia. A variant of this argument claims that if gay marriage should be permted then humans should be permted to marry non-human animals.... * gay bestialitu *
[2] In ments to that thread, my view of lls om the gay lobby for parallel protectn was somethg along the l of “tough luck”, bee I didn’t thk that vlent homophobia was enough of a social problem to warrant a rtrictn on ee speech. A “Queer” ArgumentIn some parts of the world, homosexuals are now enjoyg much more social acceptance than they did even until very recently. Wh a relatively short perd, homosexual sex has been crimalized, same-sex marriage has been regnized, and other forms of discrimatn on the basis of sexual orientatn have been prohibed.
There are plac where homosexual men n still be put to ath for engagg sexual activy wh other men. Even where much progrs has been ma there ntue to be people who see at least some of the progrs as regrs or who, while acceptg of the progrs already ma, do not thk that any further social acceptance is who are cril of homosexualy offer a wi range of arguments for their view.
Instead, I propose to foc on one argument that opponents of homosexualy sometim raise and that fenrs of homosexualy quickly dismiss as ridiculo. My view is that is an argument that should be taken much ls serly by many of those who propose but much more serly by many of those who reject argument is sometim advanced agast homosexualy self and sometim agast allowg or regnizg same-sex marriage.