Why Gay Marriage Should Not Be Legal Essay

Contents:

• WHY GAY MARRIAGE SHOULD NOT BE LEGAL ESSAY
• SHOULD GAY MARRIAGE BE LEGAL?
• GAY MARRIAGE SHOULD NOT BE LEGAL
• WHY GAY MARRIAGE SHOULD NOT BE LEGAL
• GAY MARRIAGE SHOULD BE LEGAL
• TEXAS JUDGE WHO DON’T WANT TO PERFORM GAY MARRIAGE CEREMONI HOP WEB SIGNER’S SUPREME COURT SE HELPS HER FIGHT
• GAY MARRIAGE. WHY SHOULD BE LEGALIZED

WHY GAY MARRIAGE SHOULD NOT BE LEGAL ESSAY

Therefore, bee marriage is a nsecrated unifitn of a male and a female, ready to sacrifice all that is at their disposal for the ntuatn of the human speci and societal valu, I believe all dividuals should rpect hence, the need to illegalize gay marriage. The gay alliance should be illegal, bee the unn between a male and a female matrimony is of great signifince not only to an dividual, but also to societi. Y, I nnot ny that, as normal upl, gay upl n also handle all fancial needs of their fay however, what kd of valu will such upl still their children or children their neighborhoods?

In addn, although gay parents have the potential of brgg children, such children lack the parental love that mothers and fathers n provi, bee you n image the many qutns that children brought up such fai always ask themselv.

Therefore, bee the society owns at the mentng of gay marriage, most children brought up gay marriag suffer om strs and psychologil torture, as most of them are never fortable associatg wh their peers. Y, the argument by supporters of gay marriag that the nstutn should give equal protectn to all dividuals’ rights is rrect.

SHOULD GAY MARRIAGE BE LEGAL?

However, although this is the se, do gays regnize the impact of their practice on the general societal systems, more so the marriage stutn?

GAY MARRIAGE SHOULD NOT BE LEGAL

On the other hand, although the nstutn should provi all dividuals wh equal eedoms, the society mt not fail to regnize that, to some extent acceptg gay marriag may renr “normal” marriag to lose meang.

Supporters of gay marriag should always bear md that, the jog of a female and a male matrimony is a natural practice that has been there sce time memorial, and not a law created practice (Bidstp 1). Y, although the argument that not all dividuals are relig fanatics is rrect, one thg they supporters of gay marriag fail to regnize is that, there is no way we n separate the church and the state.

Therefore, is of great signifince to rpect church doctr, bee of the ntributns church make to societi to ensure people live peaceful, lovg and supportg one another On the other hand, although most supporters of gay marriage associate wh rctn of sexually transmted diseas, as rearch studi show more than seventy-five percent of gays at one time their liv are promiscuo and never e protectn. Therefore, the argument that gay marriag n rce transmissn of sexually transmted diseas is refutable, bee rearch has proved that, stead of rcg creas the prevalence and spread of adly fectns, for example, HIV and AIDS (Shea, Wilson, Ranali, Plais, Castagna, Raabe, and Laance 1-2).

WHY GAY MARRIAGE SHOULD NOT BE LEGAL

In ncln, nsirg the impacts of legalizg gay marriage to the social health stat, norms, valu of the society and practic cherished by the society, my view there is need for the ernment to enact tough legislatn to prevent the practice om spreadg. On June 26, 2015, the US Supreme Court led that gay marriage is a right protected by the US Constutn all 50 stat. US public opn had shifted signifintly over the years, om 27% approval of gay marriage 1996 to 55% 2015, the year beme legal throughout the Uned Stat, to 61% 2019.

GAY MARRIAGE SHOULD BE LEGAL

Proponents of legal gay marriage ntend that gay marriage bans are discrimatory and unnstutnal, and that same-sex upl should have accs to all the benefs enjoyed by different-sex upl. On July 25, 2014 Miami-Da County Circu Court Judge Sarah Zabel led Florida’s gay marriage ban unnstutnal and stated that the ban “serv only to hurt, to discrimate, to prive same-sex upl and their fai of equal digny, to label and treat them as send-class cizens, and to em them unworthy of participatn one of the fundamental stutns of our society. The Amerin Psychologil Associatn, Amerin Psychiatric Associatn, and others nclud that legal gay marriage giv upl “accs to the social support that already facilat and strengthens heterosexual marriag, wh all of the psychologil and physil health benefs associated wh that support.

A study found that same-sex married upl were “signifintly ls distrsed than lbian, gay, and bisexual persons not a legally regnized relatnship. A 2010 analysis found that after their stat had banned gay marriage, gay, lbian and bisexual people suffered a 37% crease mood disorrs, a 42% crease alhol-e disorrs, and a 248% crease generalized anxiety disorrs.

TEXAS JUDGE WHO DON’T WANT TO PERFORM GAY MARRIAGE CEREMONI HOP WEB SIGNER’S SUPREME COURT SE HELPS HER FIGHT

The Congrsnal Budget Office timated 2004 that ferally-regnized gay marriage would cut the budget fic by around $450 ln a year. In July 2012 New York Cy Mayor Michael Bloomberg announced that gay marriage had ntributed $259 ln to the cy’s enomy jt a year sce the practice beme legal there July 2011.

In 2012, the Williams Instute at the Universy of California at Los Angel (UCLA) found that the first five years after Massachetts legalized gay marriage 2004, same-sex weddg expendur (such as venue rental, weddg k, etc. Relig stutns n cle to marry gay and lbian upl if they wish, but they should not dictate marriage laws for society at large. Gay marriage is a civil right protected by the US Constutn’s mments to liberty and equaly, and is an ternatnally regnized human right for all people.

Civil unns and domtic partnerships uld provi the protectns and benefs gay upl need whout changg the fn of marriage.

GAY MARRIAGE. WHY SHOULD BE LEGALIZED

2016 printial ndidate and former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fra stated that civil unns are aquate as an equivalent to marriage: “Benefs are beg btowed to gay upl [ civil unns]… I believe we need to rpect those who believe that the word marriage has a spirual foundatn… Why n’t we rpect and tolerate that while at the same time sayg ernment nnot btow benefs unequally.

Court papers filed July 2014 by attorneys fendg Arizona’s gay marriage ban stated that “the State regulat marriage for the primary purpose of channelg potentially procreative sexual relatnships to endurg unns for the sake of jog children to both their mother and their father… Same-sex upl n never provi a child wh both her blogil mother and her blogil father. Contrary to the pro gay marriage argument that some different-sex upl nnot have children or don’t want them, even those s there is still the potential to produce children.

Gay marriage has accelerated the assiatn of gays to mastream heterosexual culture to the triment of the homosexual muny.