In a landmark cisn, the Supreme Court’s lg stck down the remag state bans that prevented gay upl om gettg married.
Contents:
- ‘IT IS SO ORRED.’ SUPREME COURT JTIC ON GAY MARRIAGE CISN
- ON GAY MARRIAGE, HOW WILL THE SUPREME COURT RULE?
- GAY RIGHTS VS. FREE SPEECHSUPREME COURT BACKS WEB DIGNER OPPOSED TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE
- WHAT THE SUPREME COURT'S GAY WEDDG WEBSE LG MEANS FOR LGBTQ RIGHTS
‘IT IS SO ORRED.’ SUPREME COURT JTIC ON GAY MARRIAGE CISN
In a historic cisn for the gay right's movement, the Supreme Court led on Friday that the U.S. Constutn grants same-sex upl the right to marry. Jtice Anthony M. Kennedy, who wrote the majory opn, said that gay and lbian upl have a fundamental right to marry. * how will supreme court rule on gay marriage *
Kennedy, then the center of the High Court, rejected the optns before him, cidg agast sidg wh a same-sex uple who had been nied a ke for their Colorado weddg receptn and agast sidg wh the baker who said his oven was off-lims to gay upl. Jt a few weeks ago, when Transportatn Secretary Pete Buttigieg, the natn’s hight-rankg Senate-nfirmed gay member of the Bin Admistratn, joed TIME’s Washgton Bure for a wi-rangg nversatn, he was blunt: “I mean, Roe fell and that was the law of the land for longer than I’ve been alive. In a historic cisn for the gay right’s movement, the Supreme Court led on Friday that the U.
ON GAY MARRIAGE, HOW WILL THE SUPREME COURT RULE?
Today: A Christian webse signer legally ref to work wh gay upl. Tomorrow: All kds of discrimatn are unleashed * how will supreme court rule on gay marriage *
Kennedy, who wrote the majory opn, said that gay and lbian upl have a fundamental right to marry. Same-sex marriage supporters celebrate after the Supreme Court’s landmark lg on gay marriage.
GAY RIGHTS VS. FREE SPEECHSUPREME COURT BACKS WEB DIGNER OPPOSED TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE
Gay rights supporters celebrate Friday after the U.
WHAT THE SUPREME COURT'S GAY WEDDG WEBSE LG MEANS FOR LGBTQ RIGHTS
The issue of gay marriage reach the untry’s top jtic on Tuday and Wednday this week as the U.
Wdsor, a challenge to the untry’s Defense of Marriage Act, which f marriage as between one man and one woman and ni many feral benefs to gay upl. Defenrs of the law, however, argue that the state has the right to prefer upl which there is one man and one woman as a means of channelg procreatn, as a preferred way to raise children and to advance what the voters saw as a moral preference for heterosexual over homosexual relatnships.