Rearchers and LGBT groups clash over facial regnn tech that supposedly spots gay people.
Contents:
- ROW OVER AI THAT 'INTIFI GAY FAC'
- 'I WAS SHOCKED WAS SO EASY': MEET THE PROFSOR WHO SAYS FACIAL REGNN N TELL IF YOU'RE GAY
- THE FAMO AI GAYDAR STUDY WAS REPEATED – AND, NO, N'T TELL IF YOU'RE STRAIGHT OR NOT JT OM YOUR FACE
- A COMPUTER CAN TELL IF YOU'RE GAY JT BY LOOKG AT YOUR FACE. AND IT'S RIGHT 91% OF THE TIMEGAY FACE IS AN ACTUAL THG, {FONT:NORMAL 800 1.2REM/1.2 "D BOLD",SANS-SERIF;TEXT-TRANSFORM:NORMAL;LOR:HER;DISPLAY:LE-BLOCK;PADDG-BOTTOM:6PX;POSN:RELATIVE;TEXT-TRANSFORM:UPPERSE;}{BACKGROUND:#89308A;BOTTOM:0;NTENT:'';DISPLAY:BLOCK;HEIGHT:2PX;LEFT:0;POSN:ABSOLUTE;RIGHT:0;-WEBK-TRANSN:ALL 0.2S EASE;TRANSN:ALL 0.2S EASE;WIDTH:100%;}{LEFT:51%;RIGHT:51%;WIDTH:0;}{FONT:NORMAL 800 1.2REM/1.2 "D BOLD",SANS-SERIF;TEXT-TRANSFORM:NORMAL;LOR:HER;DISPLAY:LE-BLOCK;PADDG-BOTTOM:6PX;POSN:RELATIVE;TEXT-TRANSFORM:UPPERSE;}{BACKGROUND:#89308A;BOTTOM:0;NTENT:'';DISPLAY:BLOCK;HEIGHT:2PX;LEFT:0;POSN:ABSOLUTE;RIGHT:0;-WEBK-TRANSN:ALL 0.2S EASE;TRANSN:ALL 0.2S EASE;WIDTH:100%;}{LEFT:51%;RIGHT:51%;WIDTH:0;}NEWSBY TRISH BENDIXSEPTEMBER 8, 2017/3:42 {HEIGHT:HER;DISPLAY:-WEBK-BOX;DISPLAY:-WEBK-FLEX;DISPLAY:-MS-FLEXBOX;DISPLAY:FLEX;POSN:RELATIVE;-WEBK-FLEX-WRAP:WRAP;-MS-FLEX-WRAP:WRAP;FLEX-WRAP:WRAP;-WEBK-ALIGN-EMS:CENTER;-WEBK-BOX-ALIGN:CENTER;-MS-FLEX-ALIGN:CENTER;ALIGN-EMS:CENTER;-WEBK-BOX-PACK:CENTER;-WEBK-JTIFY-NTENT:CENTER;-MS-FLEX-PACK:CENTER;JTIFY-NTENT:CENTER;-WEBK-TRANSFORM-ORIG:CENTER;-MS-TRANSFORM-ORIG:CENTER;TRANSFORM-ORIG:CENTER;} IMG{HEIGHT:100%;WIDTH:100%;OBJECT-F:VER;}{HEIGHT:574PX;WIDTH:1020PX;}GETTY IMAGBY TRISH BENDIXSEPTEMBER 8, 2017 / 3:42 PM{"@NTEXT":","@TYPE":"NEWSARTICLE","HEADLE":"A COMPUTER CAN TELL IF YOU'RE GAY JT BY LOOKG AT YOUR FACE. AND IT'S RIGHT 91% OF THE TIME","THUMBNAILURL":","DATEPUBLISHED":"2017-09-08T19:42:55.000+0000","DATEMODIFIED":"2017-09-08T19:42:55.000+0000","IMAGE":{"@NTEXT":","@TYPE":"IMAGEOBJECT","URL":","WIDTH":1920,"HEIGHT":1080},"URL":","THOR":{"@TYPE":"ORGANIZATN","NAME":"LOGO TV"},"MAENTYOFPAGE":{"@TYPE":"WEBPAGE","@ID":"},"PUBLISHER":{"@TYPE":"ORGANIZATN","@ID":","NAME":"LOGO TV","URL":","LOGO":{"@TYPE":"IMAGEOBJECT"}},"CREATOR":"TRISH BENDIX","ARTICLESECTN":"NEWS"}{BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}A NEW PUTER PROGRAM N REGNIZE WHETHER A FACE BELONGS TO A GAY OR STRAIGHT PERSON WH UNNNY {BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}STANFORD UNIVERSY REARCHERS YILUN WANG AND MICHAL KOSSKI VELOPED ARTIFICIAL TELLIGENCE SOFTWARE THAT ED EP NRAL WORKS TO EXTRACT FEATUR OM 35,326 FACIAL IMAG, AND THEN CLASSIFIED THOSE FAC BY SEXUAL ORIENTATN."{BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}THE PROGRAM RRECTLY DISTGUISHED BETWEEN GAY AND STRAIGHT MEN A WHOPPG 81% OF S, AND BETWEEN LBIANS AND STRAIGHT WOMEN 71% OF THE TIME. THE MORE PICTUR THE PUTER HAD TO WORK WH, THE BETTER GOT: WH FIVE PHOTOS OF A SGLE GUY, THE AI'S ACCURACY SHOT UP TO 91%. (FOR WOMEN, JT BUMPED UP TO 83%.){BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}HUMAN JUDG, MEANWHILE, ONLY GOT RIGHT 61% OF THE TIME FOR MEN AND 54% FOR WOMEN.STANFORD {BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}SO WHAT, EXACTLY, WAS "GAY" ABOUT THE FAC?{BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}THE PROGRAM UTILIZED FIXED FEATUR LIKE NOSE SHAPE AND "TRANSIENT" FEATUR LIKE GROOMG STYLE. "GAY MEN AND WOMEN TEND TO HAVE GENR-ATYPIL FACIAL MORPHOLOGY, EXPRSN, AND GROOMG STYL," ACRDG TO A PAPER WANG AND KOSSKI ARE PUBLISHG THE JOURNAL OF PERSONALY AND SOCIAL {BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}THEY THEORIZED THAT, IF PRENATAL HORMON AFFECT SEXUALY, "GAY MEN SHOULD TEND TO HAVE MORE FEME FACIAL FEATUR THAN HETEROSEXUAL MEN—SMALLER JAWS AND CHS, SLIMMER EYEBROWS, LONGER NOS, AND LARGER FOREHEADS."{BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}LBIANS, THEY POS, HAVE MORE "MASCULE" {BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}"LBIANS TEND TO E LS EYE MAKP, HAD DARKER HAIR, AND WORE LS REVEALG CLOTH (NOTE THE HIGHER NECKLE)—DITG LS FEME GROOMG AND STYLE. FURTHERMORE, ALTHOUGH WOMEN TEND TO SE MORE GENERAL, LBIANS SED LS THAN THEIR HETEROSEXUAL UNTERPARTS."{BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}AND APPARENTLY LBIANS ARE MORE LIKELY TO WEAR BASEBALL PS. (NO, SERLY.){BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}THE EXPERIMENT HAD SOME LIMATNS, THOUGH: THE FAC WERE CULLED OM DATG S AND WERE UNIFORMLY OF ADULT CISGENR WHE MEN AND WOMEN. (BISEXUALS AND TRANSGENR PEOPLE, AND NON-WHE PEOPLE OF ANY ORIENTATN, WERE EXCLUD.){BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}WANG AND KOSSKI SAID THEY ATTEMPTED TO GATHER A MORE DIVERSE SAMPLE BUT "THE PREJUDICE AGAST GAY PEOPLE AND THE ADOPTN OF ONLE DATG WEBS IS UNEVENLY DISTRIBUTED ACROSS GROUPS CHARACTERIZED BY DIFFERENT ETHNICI."{BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}THEY ALSO NCE THEIR WORK ULD BE DANGERO: "OUR FDGS EXPOSE A THREAT TO THE PRIVACY AND SAFETY OF GAY MEN AND WOMEN," THEY WRE, PECIALLY PLAC WHERE HOMOSEXUALY IS A CRIME. “WE WERE REALLY DISTURBED BY THE RULTS AND SPENT MUCH TIME NSIRG WHETHER THEY SHOULD BE MA PUBLIC AT ALL. WE DID NOT WANT TO ENABLE THE VERY RISKS THAT WE ARE WARNG AGAST.”{BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}FACIAL REGNN TECHNOLOGY N BE EFUL FOR FDG CRIMALS A CROWD, BUT N BE A RISK FOR SOMEONE WHO DON'T WANT TO WEAR THEIR ORIENTATN ON THEIR SLEEVE—OR THEIR {BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;CLEAR:BOTH;}{BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;MARG:0 TO;WIDTH:90%;M-WIDTH:288PX;MAX-WIDTH:1440PX;M-HEIGHT:194PX;}LATT NEWS
- IS YOUR FACE GAY? CONSERVATIVE? CRIMAL? AI REARCHERS ARE ASKG THE WRONG QUTNS
- THIS PSYCHOLOGIST’S “GAYDAR” REARCH MAK UNFORTABLE. THAT’S THE POT.
ROW OVER AI THAT 'INTIFI GAY FAC'
* gay face ai *
Image source, Stanford UniversyImage ptn, The study created pose fac judged most and least likely to belong to homosexualsA facial regnn experiment that claims to be able to distguish between gay and heterosexual people has sparked a row between s creators and two leadg LGBT rights Stanford Universy study claims s software regnis facial featur relatg to sexual orientatn that are not perceived by human work has been acced of beg "dangero" and "junk science" the scientists volved say the are "knee-jerk" reactns. Details of the peer-reviewed project are due to be published the Journal of Personaly and Social jawsFor their study, the rearchers traed an algorhm g the photos of more than 14, 000 whe Amerins taken om a datg ed between one and five of each person's pictur and took people's sexualy as self-reported on the datg rearchers said the rultg software appeared to be able to distguish between gay and heterosexual men and women.
In one tt, when the algorhm was prented wh two photos where one picture was fely of a gay man and the other heterosexual, was able to terme which was which 81% of the women, the figure was 71%. "Gay fac tend to be genr atypil, " the rearchers said.
"Gay men had narrower jaws and longer nos, while lbians had larger jaws.
'I WAS SHOCKED WAS SO EASY': MEET THE PROFSOR WHO SAYS FACIAL REGNN N TELL IF YOU'RE GAY
Gay face is an actual thg, apparently. * gay face ai *
"But their software did not perform as well other suatns, cludg a tt which was given photos of 70 gay men and 930 heterosexual asked to pick 100 men "most likely to be gay" missed 23 of s summary of the study, the Enomist - which was first to report the rearch - poted to several "limatns" cludg a ncentratn on whe Amerins and the e of datg se pictur, which were "likely to be particularly revealg of sexual orientatn". "This rearch isn't science or news, but 's a scriptn of bety standards on datg s that ignor huge segments of the LGBTQ (lbian, gay, bisexual, transgenr and queer/qutng) muny, cludg people of lour, transgenr people, olr dividuals, and other LGBTQ people who don't want to post photos on datg s, " said Jim Halloran, chief digal officer of Glaad, a media-monorg body. "The reckls fdgs uld serve as a weapon to harm both heterosexuals who are accurately outed, as well as gay and lbian people who are suatns where g out is dangero.
"The 'subtle' differenc uld be a nsequence of gay and straight people choosg to portray themselv systematilly different ways, rather than differenc facial appearance self, " said Prof Benedict Jon, who ns the Face Rearch Lab at the Universy of was also important, he said, for the technil tails of the analysis algorhm to be published to see if they stood up to rmed cricism. Even though there are exampl throughout history om the ancient Greeks to the 18th century of people practisg physgnomy, basilly judgg a person’s character or liftyle om their facial featur, a recent study om Stanford Universy giv a morn-day versn to ntemplate—puters termg if a person is gay or straight through facial-tectn technology.
THE FAMO AI GAYDAR STUDY WAS REPEATED – AND, NO, N'T TELL IF YOU'RE STRAIGHT OR NOT JT OM YOUR FACE
AI Can't Tell if You're Gay... But Can Tell if You're a Walkg Stereotype. [First published September 9th. This post has been updated wh subsequent rmatn, noted by square brackets, ced on this rource of rpons to the story by tweeters, bloggers, media, and Kosski himself. My reflectn on peer review, ethics, and LGBTQ… * gay face ai *
Datg webse and found that a puter algorhm was rrect 81% of the time when was ed to distguish between straight and gay men, and accurate 74% of the time for women.
A COMPUTER CAN TELL IF YOU'RE GAY JT BY LOOKG AT YOUR FACE. AND IT'S RIGHT 91% OF THE TIMEGAY FACE IS AN ACTUAL THG, {FONT:NORMAL 800 1.2REM/1.2 "D BOLD",SANS-SERIF;TEXT-TRANSFORM:NORMAL;LOR:HER;DISPLAY:LE-BLOCK;PADDG-BOTTOM:6PX;POSN:RELATIVE;TEXT-TRANSFORM:UPPERSE;}{BACKGROUND:#89308A;BOTTOM:0;NTENT:'';DISPLAY:BLOCK;HEIGHT:2PX;LEFT:0;POSN:ABSOLUTE;RIGHT:0;-WEBK-TRANSN:ALL 0.2S EASE;TRANSN:ALL 0.2S EASE;WIDTH:100%;}{LEFT:51%;RIGHT:51%;WIDTH:0;}{FONT:NORMAL 800 1.2REM/1.2 "D BOLD",SANS-SERIF;TEXT-TRANSFORM:NORMAL;LOR:HER;DISPLAY:LE-BLOCK;PADDG-BOTTOM:6PX;POSN:RELATIVE;TEXT-TRANSFORM:UPPERSE;}{BACKGROUND:#89308A;BOTTOM:0;NTENT:'';DISPLAY:BLOCK;HEIGHT:2PX;LEFT:0;POSN:ABSOLUTE;RIGHT:0;-WEBK-TRANSN:ALL 0.2S EASE;TRANSN:ALL 0.2S EASE;WIDTH:100%;}{LEFT:51%;RIGHT:51%;WIDTH:0;}NEWSBY TRISH BENDIXSEPTEMBER 8, 2017/3:42 {HEIGHT:HER;DISPLAY:-WEBK-BOX;DISPLAY:-WEBK-FLEX;DISPLAY:-MS-FLEXBOX;DISPLAY:FLEX;POSN:RELATIVE;-WEBK-FLEX-WRAP:WRAP;-MS-FLEX-WRAP:WRAP;FLEX-WRAP:WRAP;-WEBK-ALIGN-EMS:CENTER;-WEBK-BOX-ALIGN:CENTER;-MS-FLEX-ALIGN:CENTER;ALIGN-EMS:CENTER;-WEBK-BOX-PACK:CENTER;-WEBK-JTIFY-NTENT:CENTER;-MS-FLEX-PACK:CENTER;JTIFY-NTENT:CENTER;-WEBK-TRANSFORM-ORIG:CENTER;-MS-TRANSFORM-ORIG:CENTER;TRANSFORM-ORIG:CENTER;} IMG{HEIGHT:100%;WIDTH:100%;OBJECT-F:VER;}{HEIGHT:574PX;WIDTH:1020PX;}GETTY IMAGBY TRISH BENDIXSEPTEMBER 8, 2017 / 3:42 PM{"@NTEXT":","@TYPE":"NEWSARTICLE","HEADLE":"A COMPUTER CAN TELL IF YOU'RE GAY JT BY LOOKG AT YOUR FACE. AND IT'S RIGHT 91% OF THE TIME","THUMBNAILURL":","DATEPUBLISHED":"2017-09-08T19:42:55.000+0000","DATEMODIFIED":"2017-09-08T19:42:55.000+0000","IMAGE":{"@NTEXT":","@TYPE":"IMAGEOBJECT","URL":","WIDTH":1920,"HEIGHT":1080},"URL":","THOR":{"@TYPE":"ORGANIZATN","NAME":"LOGO TV"},"MAENTYOFPAGE":{"@TYPE":"WEBPAGE","@ID":"},"PUBLISHER":{"@TYPE":"ORGANIZATN","@ID":","NAME":"LOGO TV","URL":","LOGO":{"@TYPE":"IMAGEOBJECT"}},"CREATOR":"TRISH BENDIX","ARTICLESECTN":"NEWS"}{BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}A NEW PUTER PROGRAM N REGNIZE WHETHER A FACE BELONGS TO A GAY OR STRAIGHT PERSON WH UNNNY {BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}STANFORD UNIVERSY REARCHERS YILUN WANG AND MICHAL KOSSKI VELOPED ARTIFICIAL TELLIGENCE SOFTWARE THAT ED EP NRAL WORKS TO EXTRACT FEATUR OM 35,326 FACIAL IMAG, AND THEN CLASSIFIED THOSE FAC BY SEXUAL ORIENTATN."{BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}THE PROGRAM RRECTLY DISTGUISHED BETWEEN GAY AND STRAIGHT MEN A WHOPPG 81% OF S, AND BETWEEN LBIANS AND STRAIGHT WOMEN 71% OF THE TIME. THE MORE PICTUR THE PUTER HAD TO WORK WH, THE BETTER GOT: WH FIVE PHOTOS OF A SGLE GUY, THE AI'S ACCURACY SHOT UP TO 91%. (FOR WOMEN, JT BUMPED UP TO 83%.){BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}HUMAN JUDG, MEANWHILE, ONLY GOT RIGHT 61% OF THE TIME FOR MEN AND 54% FOR WOMEN.STANFORD {BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}SO WHAT, EXACTLY, WAS "GAY" ABOUT THE FAC?{BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}THE PROGRAM UTILIZED FIXED FEATUR LIKE NOSE SHAPE AND "TRANSIENT" FEATUR LIKE GROOMG STYLE. "GAY MEN AND WOMEN TEND TO HAVE GENR-ATYPIL FACIAL MORPHOLOGY, EXPRSN, AND GROOMG STYL," ACRDG TO A PAPER WANG AND KOSSKI ARE PUBLISHG THE JOURNAL OF PERSONALY AND SOCIAL {BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}THEY THEORIZED THAT, IF PRENATAL HORMON AFFECT SEXUALY, "GAY MEN SHOULD TEND TO HAVE MORE FEME FACIAL FEATUR THAN HETEROSEXUAL MEN—SMALLER JAWS AND CHS, SLIMMER EYEBROWS, LONGER NOS, AND LARGER FOREHEADS."{BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}LBIANS, THEY POS, HAVE MORE "MASCULE" {BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}"LBIANS TEND TO E LS EYE MAKP, HAD DARKER HAIR, AND WORE LS REVEALG CLOTH (NOTE THE HIGHER NECKLE)—DITG LS FEME GROOMG AND STYLE. FURTHERMORE, ALTHOUGH WOMEN TEND TO SE MORE GENERAL, LBIANS SED LS THAN THEIR HETEROSEXUAL UNTERPARTS."{BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}AND APPARENTLY LBIANS ARE MORE LIKELY TO WEAR BASEBALL PS. (NO, SERLY.){BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}THE EXPERIMENT HAD SOME LIMATNS, THOUGH: THE FAC WERE CULLED OM DATG S AND WERE UNIFORMLY OF ADULT CISGENR WHE MEN AND WOMEN. (BISEXUALS AND TRANSGENR PEOPLE, AND NON-WHE PEOPLE OF ANY ORIENTATN, WERE EXCLUD.){BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}WANG AND KOSSKI SAID THEY ATTEMPTED TO GATHER A MORE DIVERSE SAMPLE BUT "THE PREJUDICE AGAST GAY PEOPLE AND THE ADOPTN OF ONLE DATG WEBS IS UNEVENLY DISTRIBUTED ACROSS GROUPS CHARACTERIZED BY DIFFERENT ETHNICI."{BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}THEY ALSO NCE THEIR WORK ULD BE DANGERO: "OUR FDGS EXPOSE A THREAT TO THE PRIVACY AND SAFETY OF GAY MEN AND WOMEN," THEY WRE, PECIALLY PLAC WHERE HOMOSEXUALY IS A CRIME. “WE WERE REALLY DISTURBED BY THE RULTS AND SPENT MUCH TIME NSIRG WHETHER THEY SHOULD BE MA PUBLIC AT ALL. WE DID NOT WANT TO ENABLE THE VERY RISKS THAT WE ARE WARNG AGAST.”{BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;PADDG:24PX 0;} A{LOR:#354A4E;-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;TEXT-RATN:UNRLE;} A:HOVER, A:FOC{-WEBK-TEXT-RATN:NONE;TEXT-RATN:NONE;} B, STRONG{FONT-WEIGHT:700;}FACIAL REGNN TECHNOLOGY N BE EFUL FOR FDG CRIMALS A CROWD, BUT N BE A RISK FOR SOMEONE WHO DON'T WANT TO WEAR THEIR ORIENTATN ON THEIR SLEEVE—OR THEIR {BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;CLEAR:BOTH;}{BOX-SIZG:BORR-BOX;MARG:0 TO;WIDTH:90%;M-WIDTH:288PX;MAX-WIDTH:1440PX;M-HEIGHT:194PX;}LATT NEWS
One pattern the mach tected the study was gay women and men typilly had “genr-atypil, ” “groomg styl, ” featur and exprsns—gay men appeared more feme and gay women appeared more mascule. Another trend the mach intified was that gay women tend to have larger jaws and smaller foreheads then straight women while gay men had larger foreheads, longer nos and narrower jaws than straight men. As quoted an article by The Guardian on the subject, Nick Rule, an associate profsor of psychology at the Universy of Toronto who has published rearch on the science of gaydar said, “It’s certaly unsettlg.
All men wh genr-atypil exprsns are gay)? Weeks after his trip to Mosw, Kosski published a ntroversial paper which he showed how face-analysg algorhms uld distguish between photographs of gay and straight people. ”In a paper published last year, Kosski and a Stanford puter scientist, Yilun Wang, reported that a mache-learng system was able to distguish between photos of gay and straight people wh a high gree of accuracy.
IS YOUR FACE GAY? CONSERVATIVE? CRIMAL? AI REARCHERS ARE ASKG THE WRONG QUTNS
Prented wh two pictur – one of a gay person, the other straight – the algorhm was traed to distguish the two 81% of s volvg imag of men and 74% of photographs of women.
Human judg, by ntrast, were able to intify the straight and gay people 61% and 54% of s, rpectively.
THIS PSYCHOLOGIST’S “GAYDAR” REARCH MAK UNFORTABLE. THAT’S THE POT.
“I was jt shocked to disver that is so easy for an algorhm to distguish between gay and straight people, ” Kosski tells me. ’ Photograph: Jason Henry/The GuardianNeher did many other people, and there was an immediate backlash when the rearch – dubbed “AI gaydar” – was previewed the Enomist magaze. ) There was also anger that Kosski had nducted rearch on a technology that uld be ed to persecute gay people untri such as Iran and Sdi Arabia, where homosexualy is punishable by ath.