Derek J. Brown reviews Robert Reilly’s ‘Makg Gay Okay: How Ratnalizg Homosexual Behavr Is Changg Everythg’ (Ignati Prs, 2014).
Contents:
- BOOK REVIEW: MAKG GAY OKAY: HOW RATNALIZG HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVR CHANG EVERYTHG
- MAKG GAY OKAY
- MAKG GAY OKAY: HOW RATNALIZG HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVR IS CHANGG EVERYTHG
- MAKG GAY OKAY
- MAKG GAY OKAY: ROBERT REILLY EXPLAS HOW AND WHY
- MAKG GAY OKAY: HOW RATNALIZG HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVR IS CHANGG EVERYTHG
- MAKG GAY OKAY
- MAKG GAY OKAY
- ROBERT REILLY ON HIS NEW BOOK, MAKG GAY OKAY
- MAKG GAY OKAY: HOW RATNALIZG HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVR IS CHANGG EVERYTHG
- MAKG GAY OKAY
- ‘WHY DO YOU HAVE TO MAKE EVERYTHG GAY?’
BOOK REVIEW: MAKG GAY OKAY: HOW RATNALIZG HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVR CHANG EVERYTHG
* making gay okay *
The law may have changed, but the opns of many and teachg of religns have Reilly’s book Makg Gay Okay: How Ratnalizg Homosexual Behavr Chang Everythg meticuloly reviews the history of the mpaign to normalize homosexual behavr. In orr to move forward is necsary to look at where the fenrs of marriage failed to make their se and to unrstand why the tth about marriage failed to nvce activist the stggle to pass state referenda fg marriage as the unn of one man and one woman, the fenrs of marriage foced on the posive aspects of marriage and sentially ignorg the problems herent the gay and lbian liftyle.
MAKG GAY OKAY
Why are Amerins beg forced to nsir homosexual acts as morally acceptable? Why has the US Supreme Court accepted the validy of same-sex marriage, which, until a ago, was unheard of the history of Wtern or any other civilizatn? Where has the gay rights movement e om, and how has so easily * making gay okay *
Reilly views this strategy as serly flawed;Unfortunately, the pro-natural fay movement largely forswore prsg the ‘hard, ugly reali’ of homosexual behavr on the nscience of the Amerin people. Now the current retreat to the posn of fendg relig eedom means that the issue of the immoraly of sodomy and other homosexual acts has most likely been abandoned for good. If, as most societi have held, homosexual acts are wrong, then, acrdg to Reilly, such acts nnot be the basis for the ntract of send half of the book als wh the effect of the gay agenda on children, science, tn, the ary, and foreign policy.
MAKG GAY OKAY: HOW RATNALIZG HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVR IS CHANGG EVERYTHG
When argug before urts and legislatur for legal protectn, the lbian, gay, bisexual, and transgenr (LGBT) activists sisted that they were victims and accedg to their mands would protect them om abe, and would not negatively affect anyone else, Reilly talogu how, as the tle of his book claims, makg gay okay and ratnalizg homosexual behavr chang everythg and not for the LGBT activists argued that, when me to sexual ethics, one group should not be allowed to impose their moraly on others. The LGBT activists label all those who do not accept their agenda as homophobic and transphobic bigots, who need to be reted, punished, or trac the shameful history of how the Amerin Psychiatric Associatn (APA) was manipulated by gay activists, surrenred to protters and allowed a rigged referendum. The LGBT activists had targeted the APA, bee as homosexual activist Frankl Kameny explaed, “I feel that the entire homophile movement…is gog to stand or fall upon the qutn of whether or not homosexualy is a sickns” (119).
The cisn to remove homosexualy om the APA’s Diagnostic and Statistil Manual was not based on well-signed published studi. Why are Amerins beg forced to nsir homosexual acts as morally acceptable? Where has the "gay rights" movement e om, and how has so easily nquered Ameri?
MAKG GAY OKAY
The power of ratnalizatn—the means by which one mentally transforms wrong to right—driv the gay rights movement, giv s revolutnary character, and mak s advot fatigable.
The homosexual e moved naturally om a plea for tolerance to cultural nqut bee the secury of s ratnalizatn requir universal acceptance.
MAKG GAY OKAY: ROBERT REILLY EXPLAS HOW AND WHY
At stake the ratnalizatn of homosexual behavr is realy self, which is why will have nsequenc that reach far beyond the issue at hand.
The further stutnalizatn of homosexualy will mean the triumph of force over reason, th unrmg the very foundatns of the Amerin Republic. "Robert Reilly shows that to go wh the flow of the homosexual movement is to go agast nature, science, children, marriage, the fay and the mon good; fact, to go agast mon sense.
MAKG GAY OKAY: HOW RATNALIZG HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVR IS CHANGG EVERYTHG
p>"If you read only one book on homosexualy and the radil chang now beg stuted wh our culture, let be this one!
MAKG GAY OKAY
" — Joseph Nilosi, PhD, Cofounr, Natnal Associatn for Rearch and Therapy of Homosexualy (NARTH). p>"Ameri's lg class is shapg our society acrdg to s taste for homosexualy and s distaste for natural fai.
MAKG GAY OKAY
"Robert Reilly explas how the acceptance of the ratnalizatn for homosexual behavr may brg down our culture and society unls is exposed, unrstood, and opposed. Robert R Reilly, Makg Gay Okay: How Ratnalizg Homosexual Behavr is Changg Everythg.
ROBERT REILLY ON HIS NEW BOOK, MAKG GAY OKAY
In his new book, Makg Gay Okay, Robert Reilly sets out to expla the recent chang and make sense of the murky moral and legal cultural landspe which the phenomena have taken root.
Reilly divis his book to two parts: the first part explor the logic behd the ratnalizatn of homosexual behavr (and same-sex marriage), and the send part tak the rear on a whirlwd ri through major US stutns, monstratg how the gay lobby has nquered each turn. The brilliance of Reilly’s first part is that he don’t treat homosexualy and same-sex marriage simply as morn-day phenomena that mt be examed, but he rightly lot the heart of the bate age-old philosophil qutns and answers to those qutns. How do this relate to the homosexual and same-sex marriage bate?
MAKG GAY OKAY: HOW RATNALIZG HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVR IS CHANGG EVERYTHG
In a chapter entled “The Lsons om Blogy, ” Reilly explor tail how we n discern om blogy and health nsequenc that homosexual relatnships are both unnatural and eply harmful for those volved. In particular, the health risks curred om homosexual sex are staggerg and explosive, wh male homosexual partners losg up to twenty years of life expectancy.
(In the Appendix, Reilly lists the myriad of diseas rultg for homosexual relatns. In short, the dysfunctn of the homosexual parents is many ways passed on to the children.
What uld possibly be wrong wh homosexual behavr and same-sex marriage? Th, what began as a plea for tolerance by the homosexual movement Ameri has morphed to a mand for total acquicence and surrenr. In a chapter on homosexual ligatn, he monstrat how the urts (both state and feral) have wrongly gone about ventg a new sort of moraly that is eply immoral and the logic of which will exorably lead to the legalizatn of every viant sexual behavr known to humany.
MAKG GAY OKAY
In the send half of the book, Reilly march through major US stutns – science, parentg, tn, the Boy Suts, the ary, and foreign policy – monstratg a terrifyg way how the gay lobby has pervad, rpted, and forced each segment of society to eher pulate to their mands or be silent. This, of urse, is the outworkg of the ratnalizg project that homosexual advot have embraced and will lead not only to a more bched society, but to one built upon a volatile and false realy that will be short-lived. It expos not only the misleadg and shallow clichés ed repeatedly by those attemptg to jtify homosexual behavr, but gets to the heart of the matter through a piercg examatn of Aristotle and Rose’s anthropology and metaphysic.
For anyone who feels lost or nfed about the rapid sexual transn Ameri has ma on homosexualy and same-sex marriage, Reilly’s book is required readg. Wh the recent lnch of Evangelils for Marriage Equaly, Robert Reilly’s latt work, Makg Gay Okay: How Ratnalizg Homosexual Behavr Is Changg Everythg, uld not be more relevant to Christians who sire to thk refully about the so-lled gay marriage bate.
Although Reilly wouldn’t lote himself wh the evangelil tradn—he is a Catholic scholar and apologist—he has much to offer evangelils who sense a ep ntradictn between the orr of creatn and homosexual acts, or who are still uncid over the qutn of same-sex “marriage. The acceptance of homosexual “marriage, ” then, is not necsarily the tellectual and moral progrsn of an enlightened society; has the potential to turn agast realy and the nature of our existence as humans.
‘WHY DO YOU HAVE TO MAKE EVERYTHG GAY?’
Makg Gay Okay: How Ratnalizg Homosexual Behavr Is Changg Everythg. Potg out that there has never been such a thg as homosexual marriage history his superfluo if man’s nature is malleable, the product of history.