Kg Jam gay claim rejected | HeraldStland

Contents:

• KG JAM GAY CLAIM REJECTED
• LOST PORTRA OF KG JAM’S GAY LOVER RURFAC AFTER 400 YEARS
• LET’S EXPLORE THE STORY OF BIBLIL NAMAKE KG JAM I AND HIS LIFELONG GAY LOVER

KG JAM GAY CLAIM REJECTED

Somehow, all my years of beg a Christian, I have never heard the charge that Kg Jam was a homosexual until the other day. A man (on Facebook…) was sayg ( short) that sce Kg Jam was a homosexual, and he missned a Bible that is still ed today, homosexualy mt be acceptable to God.

The number of webs/articl which show evince that he was a homosexual far outnumber those which offer proof that he wasn’t. A b more nclive evince is found the wrgs of people who lived durg that time which mentn the homosexual activi of Kg Jam.

LOST PORTRA OF KG JAM’S GAY LOVER RURFAC AFTER 400 YEARS

The webs/articl that ny the homosexualy of Kg Jam seem fairly uned that the “evince” about Kg Jam was primarily the work of one man who really disliked him, and who spread the li about Jam after he died. In addn, they pot to different wrgs that Jam is said to have wrten which he nmns homosexualy (sodomy), and other wrgs which he extols the virtu of marriage.

They really don’t show any evince that the letters and historil articl about the homosexualy of Kg Jam are fabrited, #2. Nearly all of the webs which ny the homosexualy of Kg Jam are KJV only webs, meang that they are hardly impartial. The reason why most of the KJV only webs are so adamant nyg the homosexualy of Jam is primarily bee of people like the “guy on Facebook” (om above) who believe that if Kg Jam was a homosexual, means that God ndon homosexualy sce the KJV Bible has flourished so much.

Or, on the flip si, there are those who say that sce Kg Jam was homosexual, the Bible which bears his name is valid sce homosexualy is a s.

LET’S EXPLORE THE STORY OF BIBLIL NAMAKE KG JAM I AND HIS LIFELONG GAY LOVER

We will return to this associatn between his grandmother’s readg of the KJV and her love for him our ncludg three ma purpos of this article are (1) to prent ntemporary arguments that the qutn whether Kg Jam had homosexual tennci has enormo signifince for how one views the Kg Jam Bible and petg translatns; (2) to review recent historil rearch that prents Kg Jam as havg had homosexual tennci; and (3) to prent our own nclns ncerng the signifince of this historil rearch for how the Kg Jam Bible may be viewed by Bible rears ntemporary discsnThe Kg Jam Bible has been gag creasg scholarly attentn recent years (see, for example, Daniell 2003; Katz 2004; McGrath 2001; Moynahan 2002; Nilson 2003). This view is sometim lled the “Kg Jam Only” (KJO) not all of the attentn pleas those cled to support the KJO posn, bee a nsirable amount of this attentn is due to discsn of Kg Jam’s own sexualy, particularly ncerng the qutn whether he had homosexual translatn and homosexualyIn The Facts on the Kg Jam Only Debate, Ankenberg and Weldon (1996) discs homosexualy and translatn mte.

“Proponents of the KJO, ” they wre, “often claim that unbelievers, heretics, occultists, and/or homosexuals have been members of the edorial or translatn mte of the morn versns” (p. If a homosexual person is on the translatn mtee, so the argument go, then that translatn is obvly not of God, th nfirmg the superry of the Kg Jam Bible (as is also assumed that no one on the translatn mte of the Kg Jam Versn uld possibly have been homosexual).

)If Riplger nmns the NIV on the grounds that remov referenc to sodomy, others have attacked the Kg Jam Versn on the grounds that Kg Jam was gay. The pot we want to lift up here, though, is that both of the thors attack the character of Kg Jam to suggt that the Kg Jam Bible is self ’s rebuttalNot surprisgly, the claim that Kg Jam had homosexual tennci has stirred up que a b of ntroversy among many supporters of the Kg Jam Bible.