The emergence of bmedil and seroadaptive HIV preventn strategi has cid wh a cle ndom e among gay men. We unrtook a social elogil analysis of ndom e and perceptns g neteen semi-stctured terviews wh HIV negative gay men Vanuver, Canada who ed HAART-based preventn strategi. Contributors to nsistent ndom e were found at var levels of the social elogil mol. Ongog ncern regardg HIV transmissn and belief the proven efficy of ndoms motivated ntextual e. When ndoms were not ed, participants utilized seroadaptive and bmedil preventn strategi to migate risk. The fdgs dite that notns of “safety” and “risk” based on nsistent ndom e are erodg as other mos of preventn ga visibily. Communy-based and public health terventns will need to shift preventn msagg om advocy for universal ndom e toward batn preventn orr to meet gay men’s current preventn needs. Interventns should advance gay men’s munitn and self-advocy skills orr to optimize the strategi.
Contents:
- BORN THIS GAY CONDOM
- TO USE OR NOT USE CONDOMS? GAY, BI, QUEER TEEN GUYS TELL US
- WHAT’S THE BT WAY TO E PROTECTN DURG GAY SEX?
- “CONDOMS ARE … LIKE PUBLIC TRANS. IT’S SOMETHG YOU WANT EVERYONE ELSE TO TAKE”: PERCEPTNS AND E OF NDOMS AMONG HIV NEGATIVE GAY MEN VANUVER, CANADA THE ERA OF BMEDIL AND SEROADAPTIVE PREVENTN
- CHANG NDOM E BY GAY MEN
BORN THIS GAY CONDOM
Unrstand health ncerns for gay men and other men who have sex wh men, and learn how to promote good health. * gay condom to raw *
Unrstand important health issu for gay men and other men who have sex wh men, and get tips for matag good Mayo Clic Staff. However, there are some specific health ncerns that gay men and other men who have sex wh men need to be aware of.
Gay men and other men who have sex wh men may be at an creased risk of prsn, bipolar disorr and anxiety. Gay men also are more likely to have body image problems and eatg disorrs, such as anorexia and bulimia, than are other men.
Many health re and mental health anizatns foced on the lbian, gay, bisexual and transgenr muny also offer substance e treatment or may be able to provi rmatn about lol rourc. And rearch has shown that gay men and other men who have sex wh men experience timate partner vlence at a higher rate than do other men.
TO USE OR NOT USE CONDOMS? GAY, BI, QUEER TEEN GUYS TELL US
Celebrate who you are wh our 'Born This Gay' Ctom Condom Foils. * gay condom to raw *
A lack of shelters and other facili equipped to offer gay men a safe, supportive place to get help also may make dntg to seek re. Concern about homophobia and the stigma sometim associated wh homosexualy may prevent some gay men om gettg route health re.
Therefore, enuragg gay, bisexual, and queer (GBQ)-intifyg teenage men to e ndoms is an important preventive step.
WHAT’S THE BT WAY TO E PROTECTN DURG GAY SEX?
How do gay and bi teenage guys feel about g ndoms? * gay condom to raw *
To read our other blog posts on the same study wh GBQ teenage men, check out: Talkg Onle Can Be Life Changg for Sexual Mory Guys and Why Aren’t Gay, Bi, Queer Teen Guys Gettg Tted For HIV?
“CONDOMS ARE … LIKE PUBLIC TRANS. IT’S SOMETHG YOU WANT EVERYONE ELSE TO TAKE”: PERCEPTNS AND E OF NDOMS AMONG HIV NEGATIVE GAY MEN VANUVER, CANADA THE ERA OF BMEDIL AND SEROADAPTIVE PREVENTN
Use of ndoms has been advoted as an important method of rcg the risk of human immunoficiency vis (HIV) transmissn among high-risk groups such as homosexual and bisexual men, prostut, traveno dg ers, adolcents, and hemophiliacs. Dpe risk-rctn tn mpaigns directed to gay men sce the early 1980s, evince shows ntued fics ndom-e skills and knowledge among gay men.
Two groups of homosexual and bisexual men were sampled, those enterg a risk-rctn tn program and participants a Gay Pri event.
CHANG NDOM E BY GAY MEN
The characteristics of those surveyed were siar to those of rponnts other studi of risk rctn among gay men. Gay men sexually exclive relatnships engaged ls nsistent e of ndoms for receptive genal-anal sex than did sgle gay men.
Gay Pri participants engaged sexual behavr that was relatively more risky for HIV transmissn than did the other group. Gay Pri participants ed ndoms ls nsistently for genal-anal sex than did the risk-rctn program fdgs dite the need for better risk rctn tn efforts directed to gay men. Contued improvement the efforts will require asssg the effectivens and nsistency of risk rctn efforts, termg the potential for gay men to relapse to more risky behavr, and intifyg gaps the knowledge of risk-rctn efforts among gay and bisexual men.