The Bchit Quot om Slia’s Gay Marriage Dissent | Vany Fair

Contents:

• READ SLIA GAY MARRIAGE DISSENT: SUPREME COURT JTICE SLAMS 'CONSTUTNAL REVISN'
• THE BCHIT QUOT OM SLIA’S GAY MARRIAGE DISSENT
• SLIA REVEALS HIS CURRENT THKG ON GAY MARRIAGE (AND MURR)
• SLIA DISSENT: GAY MARRIAGE DECISN 'JAW-DROPPG'
• 6 BT QUOT FROM SLIA'S GAY MARRIAGE DISSENT
• THE 10 MOST WILD L FROM ANTON SLIA’S EXTREME DISSENT OVER GAY MARRIAGE
• ANTON SLIA ROUTELY LED AGAST GAY RIGHTS. THOSE OPNS EXPLA HIS PHILOSOPHY.

READ SLIA GAY MARRIAGE DISSENT: SUPREME COURT JTICE SLAMS 'CONSTUTNAL REVISN'

” Fally, Slia warned that the lg to extend marriage rights to gay upl across the untry would rob the urt of s power: “Hubris is sometim fed as o’erweeng pri; and pri, we know, goeth before a fall. Protters opposed to gay marriage rallied ont of the Supreme Court Washgton on Thursday. Urt ultimately cid to end the ban on gay marriage, lg that the 14th Amendment requir stat to marry same-sex upl as well as regnize their marriag legally performed other stat.

THE BCHIT QUOT OM SLIA’S GAY MARRIAGE DISSENT

Related: Anton Slia: The Supreme Court Jtice's Life PicturFunny or not, here are some of Slia's most ntroversial opns and most outrageo quot:On Gay Rights:From the pot that the Supreme Court first led favor of gay rights 1996, when the majory led that stat uld ban discrimatory acts agast gay people, Slia's opn on the subject had some crgg. But I had thought that one uld nsir certa nduct reprehensible — murr, for example, or polygamy, or celty to animals — and uld exhib even 'anim' toward such nduct, " Slia wrote his speakg at Prceton 2012, Slia was asked by a stunt why he would pare laws banng homosexualy wh laws agast murr. "If we nnot have moral feelgs agast homosexualy, n we have agast murr?

SLIA REVEALS HIS CURRENT THKG ON GAY MARRIAGE (AND MURR)

""I'm surprised you aren't persuad, " Slia told the stunt, who intifi as 2012, Slia said homosexualy should be illegal bee had been a crime for so long.

"Homosexual sodomy? For 200 years, was crimal every state, " he June, nearly two s after Slia wrote his first dissent on gay rights, the Supreme Court legalized gay marriage famolysuggted his dissent to "ask the neart hippie, " while argug that "Freedom of Intimacy is abridged rather than expand by marriage. "Slia said he is not equatg sodomy wh murr but drawg a parallel between the bans on both, " reports the AP's Geoff Mulvihill, but he may be guilty of takg down a path we've heard before: moraly fli out the wdow, go Slia's thkg, if two gay people get married.

"I don't thk 's necsary but I thk ’s effective, " Slia said reactn to a gay stunt's qutn about his dissent a lg that stck down Texas's anti-sodomy law, reports The Daily Prcetonian, addg, "I'm surprised you weren't persuad. "While Slia may not have been directly parg murr and homosexualy Monday, he has equated homosexualy wh thgs like abortn and the ath penalty. Homosexual sodomy?

SLIA DISSENT: GAY MARRIAGE DECISN 'JAW-DROPPG'

For 200 years, was crimal every urse the big picture here is that Slia and his fellow jtic will be hearg arguments on the Defense of Marriage Act and California's Proposn 8 next Sprg and will terme if same-sex marriag and benefs on the state level will be regnized by the ernment and if gay people California n marry, rpectively. Urgent: Supreme Court Right on Gay Marriage?

To qutn s high-hand validatn of a prumptively valid statute is to act (the majory is sure) wh the purpose to 'disparage, ' 'jure, ' 'gra, ' 'mean, ' and 'huiate' our fellow human begs, our fellow cizens, who are homosexual. Based on the urt majory’s reasong, “what jtifitn uld there possibly be for nyg the benefs of marriage to homosexual upl? In Slia’s view, gay marriage should be cid by the stat.

Mother Jon highlighted “the bt (or worst) l om Slia’s angry dissent” an article that began this way: “Jtice Anton Slia is not a big fan of gay sex, gay marriage, or gay anythg. The nservative jurist rips Jtice Kennedy for, he says, clarg gay marriage opponents "enemi of the human race. "RtersDissentg om this morng's opn on the Defense of Marriage Act, Jtice Anton Slia -- as expected -- holds nothg a rippg dissent, Slia says that Jtice Anthony Kennedy and his lleagu the majory have rorted to llg opponents of gay marriage "enemi of the human race.

6 BT QUOT FROM SLIA'S GAY MARRIAGE DISSENT

To qutn s high-hand validatn of a prumptively valid statute is to act (the majory is sure) wh the purpose to "dis- parage, " "jure, " "gra, " "mean, " and "huiate" our fellow human begs, our fellow cizens, who are homo- sexual. It is one thg for a society to elect change; is another for a urt of law to impose change by adjudgg those who oppose host humani generis, enemi of the human says that the urt's holdg - while limed to the Defense of Marriage Act - is a sure sign that the majory is willg to clare gay marriage a nstutnal tak real cheek for today's majory to assure , as is gog out the door, that a nstutnal requirement to give formal regnn to same-sex marriage is not at issue here -- when what has preced that assurance is a lecture on how superr the majory's moral judgment favor of same-sex marriage is to the Congrs's hateful moral judgment agast .

I promise you this: The only thg that will "nfe" the Court's holdg is s sense of what n get away, he says, the holdg will short circu the bate over gay marriage that should have been rried out the the majory's tellg, this story is black-and-whe: Hate your neighbor or e along wh . | (Photo: Rters/Brendan McDermid)Jtice Anton Slia's dissent to Friday's gay marriage opn was gent, acerbic and lorful as a are the six bt quot wh footnot removed:1. He claims to not re one way or another about the ncept of gay people gettg married—though past opns say otherwise.

THE 10 MOST WILD L FROM ANTON SLIA’S EXTREME DISSENT OVER GAY MARRIAGE

Texas (2003)The Supreme Court led anti-sodomy laws unnstutnal 12 years before legalized gay marriage. Slia, who dissented both s (see below), ma clear this 2003 opn what he thought of the trajectory of the urt and the wisdom of the majory:"This se “do not volve” the issue of homosexual marriage only if one entertas the belief that prciple and logic have nothg to do wh the cisns of this Court. "Gay marriage lg (2015)In Obergefell v.

ANTON SLIA ROUTELY LED AGAST GAY RIGHTS. THOSE OPNS EXPLA HIS PHILOSOPHY.

Hodg, Slia aga picked up on the "logic" theme furly nouncg the urt's reasong s landmark se legalizg gay marriage natnwi, particular the language employed the majory cisn:"The world do not expect logic and precisn poetry or spiratnal popphilosophy; mands them the law. Perhaps no cha of s monstrated this better than Slia's very nsistent opposn to gay rights. In his view, wasn't so much that he was opposed to gay rights — although he was — but that such rights simply weren't protected by a very origalist terpretatn of the Constutn and s amendments.

Slia's opposn to gay rights showed his brand of nservatism.