Makg Gay Okay

Contents:

• MAKG GAY OKAY: ROBERT REILLY EXPLAS HOW AND WHY
• MAKG GAY OKAY
• MAKG GAY OKAY
• MAKG GAY OKAY: HOW RATNALIZG HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVR IS CHANGG EVERYTHG
• ROBERT REILLY ON HIS NEW BOOK, MAKG GAY OKAY
• MAKG GAY OKAY: HOW RATNALIZG HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVR IS CHANGG EVERYTHG - SOFTVER
• MAKG GAY OKAY
• BOOK REVIEW | MAKG GAY OKAY, BY ROBERT REILLY
• MAKG GAY OKAY
• LGBT MOVEMENT’S “NEW MORALY”: MAKG GAY OKAY

MAKG GAY OKAY: ROBERT REILLY EXPLAS HOW AND WHY

Reilly, entled Makg Gay Okay: How Ratnalizg Homosexual Behavr Is Changg Everythg.

The foc is on the extraordary rapidy of the change om social rejectn to social affirmatn of homosexualy.

MAKG GAY OKAY

The thor very effectively tails both the ratnale and the tactics ed to succsfully advance “gay rights”. He unrstands that there was necsarily an immense value-shift the Wt before gay marriage uld bee normative, and so he vot the first part of the book to what he lls “The Ratnalizatn and How Works”. The send part of the book, entled “Marchg through the Instutns”, refully trac the methods and tactics ed the succsful efforts to nonize “gay” as “normal” six specific ntemporary stutnal spher: science, same-sex parentg, tn, the Boy Suts, the Amerin ary and US foreign policy.

For example, as late as 1986, the US Supreme Court stated unequivolly that the US Constutn do not nfer “a fundamental right to engage homosexual sodomy”. In dog so, the Court ced the universal history of the proscriptn of homosexual nduct om ancient Roman Law through the entire Juo-Christian tradn, notg that “to hold that the act of homosexual sodomy is somehow protected as a fundamental right would be to st asi lennia of moral teachg. In other words, given the long-prevailg cultural beliefs and attus, one might argue that the most remarkable feature of the mpaign for gay rights is not that s succs me so quickly, but that took so long.

Certaly I uld wre a historil monograph monstratg how gay marriage was the evable oute of prcipl largely embraced by Wtern culture the early 20th century, or how was the likely oute given the domant trends favor of the same prcipl 1850 or 1789 or 1776, or how was at least a very grave danger based on too many velopments the 16th and 17th centuri, or how beme a real philosophil possibily begng wh the rise of Nomalism the 1400s. And, fact, what Robert Reilly do Makg Gay Okay, he do extraordarily well.

MAKG GAY OKAY

Anyone even partially ncerned or nfed about how we me, the urse of a generatn, om g reason and rights to forbid homosexual behavr to g reason and rights to teach and enforce as normal, should read this important book. Wh the recent lnch of Evangelils for Marriage Equaly, Robert Reilly’s latt work, Makg Gay Okay: How Ratnalizg Homosexual Behavr Is Changg Everythg, uld not be more relevant to Christians who sire to thk refully about the so-lled gay marriage bate. Although Reilly wouldn’t lote himself wh the evangelil tradn—he is a Catholic scholar and apologist—he has much to offer evangelils who sense a ep ntradictn between the orr of creatn and homosexual acts, or who are still uncid over the qutn of same-sex “marriage.

The acceptance of homosexual “marriage, ” then, is not necsarily the tellectual and moral progrsn of an enlightened society; has the potential to turn agast realy and the nature of our existence as humans.

Makg Gay Okay: How Ratnalizg Homosexual Behavr Is Changg Everythg. Potg out that there has never been such a thg as homosexual marriage history his superfluo if man’s nature is malleable, the product of history. While each of Reilly’s chapters is eful to Christians who sire a better handle on the issu at play the homosexual “marriage” bate, I want to highlight two that I believe are pecially pertent.

MAKG GAY OKAY: HOW RATNALIZG HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVR IS CHANGG EVERYTHG

Approvg Homosexual ‘Marriage’ and Lovg Our Neighbor. In the chapter “Lsons om Blogy, ” Reilly aims to brg rears face-to face wh the stctive nature of homosexual acts, particularly sodomy.

Ined, when Christians approve of and promote homosexual “marriage, ” the ntext which homosexual acts are performed, they are abditg Christ’s ll to love their neighbor.

Reilly’s discsn of the health perils that attend male homosexual practice illtrate one reason why. By sign, there n be no “anatomil f” between two men sce, unlike female genalia, the receptive an ed homosexual “terurse” is “solely... Bee the body is beg ed a way ntrary to s sign, anal terurse unsurprisgly leads to ser health problems for practicg homosexual men.

ROBERT REILLY ON HIS NEW BOOK, MAKG GAY OKAY

It is well documented that higher rat of rectal ncer, rectal prolapse, perforatn, chlamydia, cryptosporidsis, giardiasis, viral hepatis B, syphilis, HIV, and AIDS afflict men who participate homosexual “terurse.

Reilly is right: Ratnalizg homosexual behavr is changg everythg. Further, bee of his tegoril reliance on natural law and reason to tablish his argument, Reilly nnot fally offer hope to practicg homosexuals or those who oppose gay “marriage. Why are Amerins beg forced to nsir homosexual acts as morally acceptable?

MAKG GAY OKAY: HOW RATNALIZG HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVR IS CHANGG EVERYTHG - SOFTVER

Where has the "gay rights" movement e om, and how has so easily nquered Ameri?

The power of ratnalizatn—the means by which one mentally transforms wrong to right—driv the gay rights movement, giv s revolutnary character, and mak s advot fatigable. The homosexual e moved naturally om a plea for tolerance to cultural nqut bee the secury of s ratnalizatn requir universal acceptance.

At stake the ratnalizatn of homosexual behavr is realy self, which is why will have nsequenc that reach far beyond the issue at hand. The further stutnalizatn of homosexualy will mean the triumph of force over reason, th unrmg the very foundatns of the Amerin Republic. "Robert Reilly shows that to go wh the flow of the homosexual movement is to go agast nature, science, children, marriage, the fay and the mon good; fact, to go agast mon sense.

MAKG GAY OKAY

p>"If you read only one book on homosexualy and the radil chang now beg stuted wh our culture, let be this one! " — Joseph Nilosi, PhD, Cofounr, Natnal Associatn for Rearch and Therapy of Homosexualy (NARTH).

p>"Ameri's lg class is shapg our society acrdg to s taste for homosexualy and s distaste for natural fai. "Robert Reilly explas how the acceptance of the ratnalizatn for homosexual behavr may brg down our culture and society unls is exposed, unrstood, and opposed. ISBN: SREILLRORMAKINGGAYOKAYHOWRATI9781586178338.

Where has the gay rights movement e om, and how has so easily nquered Ameri? The power of ratnalizatn-the means by which one mentally transforms wrong to right-driv the gay rights movement, giv s revolutnary character, and mak s advot fatigable.

BOOK REVIEW | MAKG GAY OKAY, BY ROBERT REILLY

At stake the ratnalizatn of homosexual behavr is the notn that human begs are orred to a purpose that is given by their Nature. This is what the bate over homosexualy is really about-the Nature of realy self.

Praise for Makg Gay Okay. "If you read only one book on homosexualy, natural law theory, and the radil chang now beg stuted wh our culture, let be this one!... CONTINUED – Joseph Nilosi, PhD, Co-Founr, Natnal Associatn for Rearch and Therapy of Homosexualy (NARTH).

MAKG GAY OKAY

"Reilly has drawn on his extensive knowledge of classil polil philosophy to expla the full spe of the dangers herent the morn homosexual rights movement....

"In our society, homosexualy has bee more than a ‘sexual orientatn'.

"Robert Reilly shows that to go wh the flow of the homosexual movement is to go agast nature, science, children, marriage, the fay and the mon good; fact to go agast mon sense.... For addnal praise for Makg Gay Okay CLICK HERE.

LGBT MOVEMENT’S “NEW MORALY”: MAKG GAY OKAY

Secretary of Defense and special assistant to Print Ronald Reagan, spoke to LifeSeNews about his newt book, Makg Gay Okay: How Ratnalizg Homosexual Behavr Is Changg Everythg, published by Ignati Prs. This is part of the judicial shell game that has allowed the urts to substute homosexual “marriage” for marriage. But one has to ask the qutn: How n homosexuals nsummate a marriage and, if they n’t, how n be a marriage?