Contents:
- ‘SADLY UNMON’: MATT WALSH AND JOE ROGAN DEBATE GAY MARRIAGE, REGNIZE IMPORTANCE OF ‘CIVIL CONVERSATN’
- REVIEWG JOE ROGAN AND MATT WALSH ON GAY “MARRIAGE”
‘SADLY UNMON’: MATT WALSH AND JOE ROGAN DEBATE GAY MARRIAGE, REGNIZE IMPORTANCE OF ‘CIVIL CONVERSATN’
Any further cricism of me or my book is now homophobic. Some right-wg media figur and fluencers have doubled down on the e of flammatory rhetoric agast the LGBTQ muny the wake of Saturday night’s shootg at a Colorado gay club that killed five.
” Broar anti-LGBTQ sentiment has been growg on social media, acrdg to Blackburn, an assistant profsor of puter science at Bghamton Universy New York who studi onle extremism, found that e of the term “groomg” on social media creased by 100% begng March pared to the start of Twter, the e of the anti-gay slur “fa----” had a notable crease the past seven days, acrdg to data reviewed by a team of rearchers at the Center for Strategic Communitn at Montclair State Universy, which studi and monors social media. The Daily Wire’s Matt Walsh and podster Joe Rogan had a spired bate Monday on the hot-button topic of gay marriage and the role of relatnships officially regnized by Spotify’s “The Joe Rogan Experience” podst, the host asked Walsh why is so difficult for people of opposg views of same-sex marriage to fd mon ground.
REVIEWG JOE ROGAN AND MATT WALSH ON GAY “MARRIAGE”
“There’s not a promise gay men that want to be married, love and want to formalize their bond so they n see their partner if there’s a medil emergency or if there’s a ath where you assign assets to your loved one? ”Rogan prsed, notg that gay upl n have children through surrogacy, and their efforts to raise them to be productive were important for society. In rponse, Walsh proclaimed that “any further cricism” of his book would be “homophobic.
This is homophobia and gay erasure.
The qutn was: You say that you want to rce abortns, which will probably mean puttg more children up for adoptn but you would rather leave children orphanag than allow lovg gay upl to adopt you really that is better for a child to be a foster home than adopted by a gay uple and how do this work wh your pro-life rponse, Walsh began by explag how he believed every child would be adopted if abortns were hypothetil aboln of abortn would not rult a whole bunch of babi stuck purgatory the system for years on is no problem this untry wh babi not fdg fai to adopt them. What I would ask you is, if we are talkg about gay adoptn, which of the two is expendable?