Opponents of homosexualy sometim argue that if homosexual sex is morally permissible then so are btialy and necrophilia. A variant of this argument claims that if gay marriage should be permted then humans should be permted to marry non-human animals....
Contents:
GAY BEAST
* gay beasality *
A “Queer” ArgumentIn some parts of the world, homosexuals are now enjoyg much more social acceptance than they did even until very recently. Wh a relatively short perd, homosexual sex has been crimalized, same-sex marriage has been regnized, and other forms of discrimatn on the basis of sexual orientatn have been prohibed.
There are plac where homosexual men n still be put to ath for engagg sexual activy wh other men. Even where much progrs has been ma there ntue to be people who see at least some of the progrs as regrs or who, while acceptg of the progrs already ma, do not thk that any further social acceptance is who are cril of homosexualy offer a wi range of arguments for their view. Instead, I propose to foc on one argument that opponents of homosexualy sometim raise and that fenrs of homosexualy quickly dismiss as ridiculo.
My view is that is an argument that should be taken much ls serly by many of those who propose but much more serly by many of those who reject argument is sometim advanced agast homosexualy self and sometim agast allowg or regnizg same-sex marriage. If there is nothg morally wrong wh homosexualy, then there is also nothg morally wrong wh btialy and necrophilia. Therefore, there is somethg morally wrong wh homosexualy.