One of the strongt arguments agast nsensual adult ct is that ctuo unns uld rult children wh geic fects, but sce that ncern wouldnt apply to same-sex upl, an Irish polil lear has argued that gay s should be allowed to marry.
Contents:
WHY CAN'T TWO GAY BROTHERS MARRY?
One of the strongt arguments agast nsensual adult ct is that ctuo unns uld rult children wh geic fects, but sce that ncern wouldn't apply to same-sex upl, an Irish polil lear has argued that gay s should be allowed to "marry." And that only begs the next obv qutn: Why not gay brothers or gay sisters? * gay brothers marry *
One of the strongt arguments agast nsensual adult ct is that ctuo unns uld rult children wh geic fects, but sce that ncern wouldn't apply to same-sex upl, an Irish polil lear has argued that gay s should be allowed to "marry. " And that only begs the next obv qutn: Why not gay brothers or gay sisters? As reported The Irish Tim, Inpennt Senator David Norris, himself gay, "has said that gay s should be allowed to marry each other followg the same-sex marriage referendum.
WHY CAN'T TWO GAY BROTHERS MARRY?
So, no sooner do the Irish Legislature officially announce the legalizg of same-sex "marriage" than an Irish Senator lls for gay s to be allowed to marry. Then wouldn't the same le of reasong apply to gay brothers or sisters who wanted to "marry"? And if the taboos agast homosexual "marriage" are now nsired outdated and tolerant, why n't the same thg be said about the taboos agast adult ct?
And om a "progrsive" Christian perspective, if Levic 18 do not apply to believers today (cludg, of urse, the prohibn agast homosexual practice Levic 18:22), then why should the prohibns agast ct that same chapter (found vers 6-17) still apply? Haven't we heard all the arguments before, when to homosexual unns?