Homosexualy and Gay Rights | Ronald Reagan

Contents:

• THE REAL RERD OF THE REAGANS ON GAYS AND AIDS
• HOMOSEXUALY AND GAY RIGHTS
• RONALD REAGAN FEARED SON WAS GAY WHEN HE BEME BALLET DANCER
• WHEN REAGAN SAID GAY

THE REAL RERD OF THE REAGANS ON GAYS AND AIDS

It was 3:15 on the morng of June 26, 1980, and Congrsman Bob Livgston was extraordarily dnk, hidg the ngrsnal gym beneath the Rayburn Hoe Office Buildg, petrified that a team of highly traed right-wg homosexual assasss workg on behalf of Ronald Reagan was about to kill him. While public attus have bee far more open, the suatn that someone is gay — whether te or not — remas a potent weapon (as elements of the mpaign agast North Carola Republin Rep.

This acunt of the alleged “homosexual rg” that ntrolled Ronald Reagan, and the efforts to expose on the eve of the 1980 Republin Natnal Conventn that nomated him for the princy, is piled om terviews wh several of the survivg participants and documents unvered the papers of former Washgton Post Executive Edor Ben Bradlee.

HOMOSEXUALY AND GAY RIGHTS

“That stuff,” or what Kemp adviser Ju Wanniski termed “the homosexual thg,” had dogged the upstate New York ngrsman and former profsnal football player sce the fall of 1967, when the syndited newspaper lumnists Drew Pearson and Jack Anrson published a piece lkg Kemp to a “homosexual rg” operatg wh Reagan’s gubernatorial office. “There is nothg, and there was nothg.” The “slanr” and “old lumny” that the virile ex-football pro and father of four might be gay, journalists Rowland Evans and Robert Novak wrote at the time, was a “vic nard,” the sort of “poisono” “garbage” one found “submerged the polil sewers” and other “gutter munitns” that “not only do gross jtice to their victims but also mean and pollute mocratic ernment.”. Behd those closed doors, McCloskey suggted strongly that the possibily of Kemp as a nng mate was proof that the “homosexual rg” around Reagan, long dismissed as mor, might be somethg all too real.

Bt began llg him antilly to report that “homosexual people were very close to Reagan’s mpaign learship,” that they were “nng” Reagan’s mpaign, and that “the suatn is absolutely out of ntrol.” It was not until a boozy lunch wh a man claimg to have been a “long time Reagan associate,” however, that Bt found what he believed to be the “smokg gun” provg that Reagan was ntrolled by homosexuals. “The big joke on Capol Hill,” he told me an terview at his home outsi Sacramento 2019, “was that the most dangero posn pro football is to be Jack Kemp’s center.” After hearg om Bt, McCloskey agreed that a Kemp nomatn would revive the 1967 “Sndal Sacramento,” possibly leadg to revelatns about the other homosexuals Reagan’s orb and thereby imperilg the GOP ticket. An Eisenhower-era executive orr barrg gay people om holdg feral ernment jobs (on the grounds that they were supposedly more sceptible to blackmail) had led to a purge of thoands of workers, and while the civil service lifted s ban 1975, gays were still prohibed om holdg secury clearanc (a rtrictn that would not be lifted until 1995).

“There is nothg herently wrong wh [homosexualy],” McCloskey was later to wre, wh a veat, “ any office which do not have natnal secury rponsibili.” And sce the alleged homosexuals Reagan’s orb were all closeted, they were prumably vulnerable to ducement by foreign powers. Over dner at The Palm, some five weeks after the exchange McCloskey’s office, Livgston apparently uld not get the salac stori volvg Kemp and the homosexual Reagan ais out of his md.

RONALD REAGAN FEARED SON WAS GAY WHEN HE BEME BALLET DANCER

It was certaly not raised by me.” At one pot, however, Bouchey might have volunteered the possibily that Kemp and Reagan himself had both engaged gay sex. Livgston’s md began to procs the jumble of thgs he had seen and heard over the past few weeks: the long-standg mors about Kemp; the supposed gay work encirclg Reagan; McCloskey’s ntact who claimed that he, too, had been h on by gay Reagan; Bouchey’s ti to var Lat Amerin juntas and paraari.

“I jt had a terrible experience.” Livgston proceed to expla how he had jt spent the night drkg wh a iend and aterny brother who “ns a secury agency which furnish support, trag and weapons for Lat Amerin ernments.” This person had the past mentned “hs” across Lat Ameri, and the prev October, a full week before the El Salvadoran ary staged a up, he predicted wh chillg accuracy “precisely what was gog to happen and who would be volved.” He “has the pacy to ‘h’ people both Lat Ameri and here” the Uned Stat, and he “dited to me durg the eveng that Kemp was certaly a participant homosexual nduct and that he thought possible Reagan was also.” After makg clear that he “saw nothg wrong wh men enjoyg each other’s pany sexually,” this man “ma a pass at me on three different ocsns” over the urse of the eveng. Apprised of a clanste homosexual bal reachg all the way om Washgton to Sacramento, and om San Salvador to Santiago, Livgston had balked at s iatn r and th put himself grave danger.

When Bill Bt first told McCloskey back 1976 about the homosexual advanc ma to him by the two Reagan ais, he had given McCloskey and four other people sealed envelop ntag a statement about one of those enunters. Over the urse of the followg week, McCloskey typed up everythg he knew about the trigu ncerng the prumptive Republin printial nomee — the 1967 “homosexual rg” sndal Sacramento, the repeated sexual importung of Bill Bt by var Reagan ais, Bob Livgston’s dramatic pe om a dread homosexual h squad — to a two-part, 13-page, 33-pot nfintial memorandum.

WHEN REAGAN SAID GAY

As to the story’s newsworths, “the foc was that there uld be a circle of people tryg to ntrol Reagan and there may be a monaly of gay-ns,” Tyler relled. The sence of Bt’s allegatns, Armstrong wrote a memo to his lleagu, was that submissn to the sexual mands of an fluential circle of gay men was “the se qua non of succs the Reagan anizatn.” Bt, he wrote, was “sane, sober, reful and rtraed,” not “flaky or kooky.” In appearance, he was “sort of Calif.

“Count me out until someone on this list [of alleged homosexuals] is actually servg a printial admistratn wh accs to natnal secury rmatn or until a more current pattern of some group is evint,” Armstrong nclud. While gay sex might still have been illegal most Amerin stat at the time, and gay people officially remaed “secury risks,” was hard to see how any of the alleged activy volvg the Reagan ais threatened the public tst. The prence of a closeted homosexual, Peter Hannaford, a potential Reagan admistratn uld pose a threat to natnal secury, McCloskey believed, and so he took his ncerns directly to Reagan’s longtime adviser and mpaign chief of staff, Ed Mee.

“Uned Stat cryptographers and Brish scientists have fected to the Soviet Unn, reportedly part bee of the threat of exposure of homosexual nduct,” McCloskey wrote Mee. “Wh the growg numbers and polil volvement of the homosexual muni across the natn,” a velopment McCloskey weled, “ would be my judgment that there will be very few secrets about who has and who has not engaged homosexual nduct.”. McCloskey suggted that Mee ask “any persons agast whom reputable cizens have raised ntentns of homosexual nduct to step asi om posns of rponsibily the Reagan team at the earlit possible date.