California still has an anti-gay marriage law on the books. Voters uld remove next year | AP News

Contents:

• CALIFORNIA VOTERS WILL BE ASKED TO REAFFIRM GAY MARRIAGE PROTECTNS ON 2024 BALLOT
• CALIFORNIA STILL HAS AN ANTI-GAY MARRIAGE LAW ON THE BOOKS. VOTERS ULD REMOVE NEXT YEAR
• PROP 8 LG EXPLAED: WHY GAY MARRIAGE WILL RUME CALIFORNIA
• LAWMAKERS WANT CA VOTERS TO OFFICIALLY STRIKE DOWN PROP. 8, THE BAN ON GAY MARRIAGE MEASURE
• CALIFORNIA STILL HAS AN ANTI-GAY MARRIAGE LAW ON THE BOOKS. VOTERS ULD REMOVE NEXT YEAR
• CALIFORNIA STILL HAS AN ANTI-GAY MARRIAGE LAW ON THE BOOKS. VOTERS ULD REMOVE NEXT YEAR
• WILL CALIFORNIA PROTECT GAY MARRIAGE S NSTUTN?
• PROP. 8 AND DOMA: THE ROAD TO GAY MARRIAGE
• PROPOSN 8 TIMELE: A HISTORY OF CALIFORNIA'S GAY MARRIAGE BAN AND ITS LEGAL CHALLENG
• TRANSCRIPT AND AUD: SUPREME COURT ARGUMENTS ON CALIFORNIA GAY MARRIAGE BAN
• PROPOSN 8: GAY MARRIAGE ON CALIFORNIA'S BALLOT

CALIFORNIA VOTERS WILL BE ASKED TO REAFFIRM GAY MARRIAGE PROTECTNS ON 2024 BALLOT

Californians will vote on a proposal to amend the state Constutn on the 2024 ballot to reaffirm gay marriage rights — a ut move that amid natnal anxiety after recent lgs by the nservative-leang U. Although there is no current threat to the legaly of gay marriage, and Print Bin signed a bill safeguardg last year, the Democratic-domant state Legislature is seekg to remove language om California’s Constutn that still f marriage as between a man and outdated state fn has been emed unenforceable and unnstutnal thanks to feral law, but LGBTQ advocy groups are askg voters to repeal and amend the California Constutn to stead explicly state that marriage is “a fundamental right. Gav Newsom was out of state, Senate lear Toni Atks (D-San Diego) signed bills to law on his behalf as the first out gay actg ernor.

CALIFORNIA STILL HAS AN ANTI-GAY MARRIAGE LAW ON THE BOOKS. VOTERS ULD REMOVE NEXT YEAR

Wh over 13 ln vot st, California voters approve Proposn 8 on November 4, 2008, amendg the state’s nstutn to ban same-sex months earlier, May 2008, the California Supreme Court had emed the state’s ban on same-sex marriage unnstutnal, makg California the send state the untry to legalize gay marriage. Californian voters received robolls om former print Bill Clton askg them to vote no on the measure, while actors om the televisn show “Ugly Betty” argued Spanish-language TV spots that votg no “is not about beg gay or straight, ” but “about beg Amerin.

”The Protect Marriage mpaign supportg Proposn 8 nstantly voked the “far-reachg nsequenc” of legal gay marriage, particularly the implitn that school curriculums would be required to teach that gay marriage is “the same as tradnal marriage. ” Pollster David Fleischer, his analysis of the electn rults, found that the greatt shift toward “Y” among uncid voters was “among parents wh children unr 18 livg at home—many of them whe Democrats, ” who feared the effects of legal gay marriage on their children’s public tn.

PROP 8 LG EXPLAED: WHY GAY MARRIAGE WILL RUME CALIFORNIA

READ MORE: The Supreme Court Rulgs That Have Shaped Gay Rights AmeriAlso on This Day History November | 4. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed a subsequent legislative attempt to legalize gay marriage. Supreme Court legalized gay marriage natnally two years 2020, Nevada beme the first state to ensure the right to same-sex marriage s state nstutn.

The measure put gay and lbian marriag on hold the state, but a feral appeals urt 2010 emed Proposn 8 se ma s way to the US Supreme Court, which dismissed an appeal 2013 over same-sex marriage on jurisdictnal grounds, lg private parti did not have standg to fend California’s voter-approved ballot measure barrg gay and lbian upl om state-sanctned lg cleared the way for same-sex marriag the state to rume and Proposn 8 has remaed on the books but unenforced. “For the hundreds of thoands of Californians gay and lbian hoeholds who are managg their day-to-day liv, this cisn affirms the full legal protectns and safeguards I believe everyone serv. In holdg that Prop 8 nnot stand bee vlat the equal protectn and due procs rights of California’s lbian and gay upl, this cisn adds to the growg nsens urts and legislatur across the untry that there are no good reasons for excludg same-sex upl om marriage.

LAWMAKERS WANT CA VOTERS TO OFFICIALLY STRIKE DOWN PROP. 8, THE BAN ON GAY MARRIAGE MEASURE

“The urt examed the range of exc ed by anti-gay groups to jtify this ernment discrimatn agast same-sex upl. The ttimony of leadg experts on everythg om child velopment to adult psychology to the public sts of anti-gay discrimatn laid bare the misrmatn and outright li that anti-gay groups have been phg on the public.

It doubtls will help more people see that anti-gay discrimatn marriage is stctive and unjtifiable.

District Judge Vghn Walker led [[Read the cisn]()] the su filed by two gay upl who claimed the ban vlated their civil rights.

CALIFORNIA STILL HAS AN ANTI-GAY MARRIAGE LAW ON THE BOOKS. VOTERS ULD REMOVE NEXT YEAR

Gay rights advot and civil libertarians say the battle is a fight for equal rights, while opponents, cludg many relig nservativ, see same-sex marriage as a threat to the “tradnal fay. “Proposn 8 fails to advance any ratnal basis sglg out gay men and lbians for nial of a marriage license. The Supreme Court lg on a California law known as Proposn 8 me down to a legal technily but has huge practil effect — rtorg gay marriage the natn’s most populo urt led that proponents of Proposn 8, a ban on gay marriage passed by California voters 2008, did not have the legal right to fend the law the feral Jtice John Roberts, wrg for the urt, said that the proponents — the people who put Proposn 8 on the ballot — had no “personal stake” fendg , at least no more than other ordary cizens of California.

To have a se, the standard says, you have to show California Supreme Court led May 2008 that gay upl had a right to marry. Six months later, Proposn 8 passed wh 52 percent of the vote, haltg gay marriage gay upl then sued feral urt to overturn the ban.

CALIFORNIA STILL HAS AN ANTI-GAY MARRIAGE LAW ON THE BOOKS. VOTERS ULD REMOVE NEXT YEAR

The Supreme Court said Wednday that they had no lg was important not jt for what did — clear the way for the rumptn of gay marriage California — but for what didn’t do. The urt ma no lg on whether there is a nstutnal right to gay marriage. ”The lg was much narrower than the other major Supreme Court cisn on Wednday, which held that gay upl who are legally married their stat are entled to feral benefs.

WILL CALIFORNIA PROTECT GAY MARRIAGE S NSTUTN?

Gav Newsom told NBC News that gay marriage would rume California wh 30 days. Opponents of gay marriage took heart potg out that the urt was clearly leavg to dividual stat to fe marriage. “The battle is gog to ntue to be fought out at the stat as we fully expected, ” said John Eastman, chairman of the Natnal Organizatn for Marriage, the leadg group opposed to gay marriage.

California still has an anti-gay marriage law on the books. Supreme Court legalized gay marriage natnally two years later. on the gay liftyle.

benefi ts of gay or lbian domtic partnerships. ) If the gay marriage lg is not overturned,. there is no difference between gay marriage and tradnal.

PROP. 8 AND DOMA: THE ROAD TO GAY MARRIAGE

schools teachg our kids that gay marriage is okay. rights of gay domtic partnerships. wh gays livg the liftyle they choose.

However, while gays have the right to their private liv, they do.

PROPOSN 8 TIMELE: A HISTORY OF CALIFORNIA'S GAY MARRIAGE BAN AND ITS LEGAL CHALLENG

If gay activists want to legalize gay marriage,. WOULD DENY LESBIAN AND GAY COUPLES that same. GAY AND LESBIAN COUPLES AND ANOTHER SET FOR.

MARRIAGE FOR GAY AND LESBIAN COUPLES, PEOPLE. everyone California—straight, gay, or lbian—serv.

↑ Huffgton Post, "Supreme Court Rul On Prop 8, Lets Gay Marriage Rume In California, " June 26, 2013. News, "McCa Supports Efforts to Ban Gay Marriage, " June 27, 2008.

TRANSCRIPT AND AUD: SUPREME COURT ARGUMENTS ON CALIFORNIA GAY MARRIAGE BAN

↑ The Jewish Daily Forward, "Orthodox Jo Fight Agast Gay Nuptials, " Augt 28, 2008. SACRAMENTO — More than 18 years after Gav Newsom fied feral law by issug marriage licens to same-sex upl as San Francis mayor, Print Bin is on the cp of signg legislatn that ensur gay marriag are regnized by the feral ernment and every state the natn. “As much as this is a very important issue to gay and lbian people who are marriag or look forward to beg marriag, ” Michelson said, “I doubt that is the issue that is gog to be at the top of people’s mds when to future printial rac.

There’s no ditn, however, that the majory of jtic have much appete to do the same on gay marriage. In January, the Public Policy Instute of California found that a whoppg 75% of likely voters support a policy allowg gay and lbians upl to marry. Wh the urt's lg, gay marriage is once aga officially legal California.

While many qutns rema about the broar nstutnal issue ncerng the right of gay and lbian upl to get married, June 26 will be remembered as the day California's gay marriage ban a look at the history of Proposn 8 below:Popular the CommunyYou May Like. Transcript And Aud: Supreme Court Arguments On California Gay Marriage Ban. The Supreme Court on Tuday heard oral arguments on California's voter-approved gay marriage ban, known as Proposn 8.

PROPOSN 8: GAY MARRIAGE ON CALIFORNIA'S BALLOT

And, Your Honor, I simply make the observatn that seems implsible the extreme, ankly, for ne jtic to have — to have seen no substantial Feral qutn if is te, as the Rponnts mata, that the tradnal fn of marriage sofar as — sofar as do not clu same-sex upl, sofar as is a genr fn is irratnal and n only be explaed, n only be explaed, as a rult of anti-gay malice and a bare sire to harm. But we — we agree that to the extent that the classifitn impacts, as clearly do, same-sex upl, that — that classifitn n be viewed as beg one of sexual orientatn rather than - JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: Outsi of the - outsi of the marriage ntext, n you thk of any other ratnal basis, reason, for a State g sexual orientatn as a factor nyg homosexuals benefs or imposg burns on them? What precisely is the way which allowg gay upl to marry would terfere wh the visn of marriage as procreatn of children that allowg sterile upl of different sex to marry would not?