Neil Gorsuch: Judge's Dissertatn Is Anti Gay Marriage | Time

Contents:

• GORSUCH HTS AT POSSIBLE DISAGREEMENT ON GAY ‘MARRIAGE’
• HOW SAFE IS GAY MARRIAGE? ADVOT FEAR CREASGLY NSERVATIVE URT
• GORSUCH: GAY MARRIAGE IS ‘ABSOLUTELY SETTLED LAW’
• NEIL GORSUCH IS THE ANTI-LGBTQ NIGHTMARE HIS GAY FRIENDS HOPED HE WASN'T
• SUPREME COURT PROTECTS WEB SIGNER WHO WON’T DO GAY WEDDG WEBS
• FIRG OF GAY CATHOLIC SCHOOL TEACHER ULD TT LATT SUPREME COURT LG
• GORSUCH: GAY MARRIAGE 'ABSOLUTELY SETTLED LAW.' SHOULD CONSERVATIV BE CONCERNED?
• GORSUCH NOT EASY TO PIGEONHOLE ON GAY RIGHTS, FRIENDS SAY

GORSUCH HTS AT POSSIBLE DISAGREEMENT ON GAY ‘MARRIAGE’

The cisn is an unequivol victory for those argug that protectg civil rights the workplace clus protectg gay and transgenr people om workplace discrimatn. Liberals are unrstandably cisn is an unequivol victory for those argug that protectg civil rights the workplace clus protectg gay and transgenr the big qutn is: How do a cidly nservative Supreme Court make a cidly liberal lg? "An employer who fir an dividual for beg homosexual or transgenr fir that person for tras or actns would not have qutned members of a different sex.

HOW SAFE IS GAY MARRIAGE? ADVOT FEAR CREASGLY NSERVATIVE URT

Jtice Anthony Kennedy's retirement left many wonrg what would happen to gay and transgenr rights. Rights lgs the urt’s history, protectg gay and transgenr people om workplace discrimatn and nfoundg those who thought he would be a reliable nservative on those issu. Jtice Gorsuch led a 6-to-3 majory clarg that gay and transgenr workers are protected by Tle VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibs discrimatn based on race, relign, natnal orig and sex.

“We do not hate to regnize today a necsary nsequence of that legislative choice: An employer who fir an dividual merely for beg gay or transgenr fi the law. ”His ncln: “An employer who fir an dividual for beg homosexual or transgenr fir that person for tras or actns would not have qutned members of a different sex.

GORSUCH: GAY MARRIAGE IS ‘ABSOLUTELY SETTLED LAW’

Jtice Kennedy played a pivotal role many of the biggt gay rights s of the last quarter-century and was the cidg vote and wrote the majory opn Obergefell v. Hodg, the 2015 se that tablished a nstutnal right to same-sex Jtice Kennedy retired 2018, gay rights advot said they feared that the urt was ls likely to support their e.

NEIL GORSUCH IS THE ANTI-LGBTQ NIGHTMARE HIS GAY FRIENDS HOPED HE WASN'T

Instead he wrote an opn that was immediately hailed by gay and transgenr rights groups as a landmark his opn, Jtice Gorsuch employed a fundamentally nservative prciple — a leral readg of the words of a statute — to reach a cisn that ntrasts sharply wh the nclns of the other nservative jtic on the a dissent, Jtice Samuel A.

Longtime gay iends have said they have always found him to be acceptg of them and even happy about who they are. And the Epispal church he attend liberal Boulr, Colo., before g to Washgton weled gay Goodbm relled 2017 how he scribed himself to Jtice Gorsuch, at the time a judge on the Uned Stat Court of Appeals for the 10th Circu, durg an terview for a clerkship 2008: “I said, ‘Listen, I’m a liberal gay Jew om New England and you were appoted by Gee W. Goodbm told The New York Tim that when he married his longtime partner 2014 — before the urt legalized gay marriage — Jtice Gorsuch was “thrilled for .

Tmp picked Jtice Gorsuch for the urt, some of those gay iends and former clerks predicted that would be difficult to pigeonhole his legal approach to the issue of gay rights when he beme a jtice. Few liberal groups paid much attentn, engagg a fierce effort to keep him off the Legal, a gay rights anizatn, posted a statement January 2017 wh the headle “Neil Gorsuch Has an Unacceptable, Hostile Rerd Towards L.

SUPREME COURT PROTECTS WEB SIGNER WHO WON’T DO GAY WEDDG WEBS

It is a watershed moment om an unlikely thor that means gay, lbian and transgenr workers are protected by feral civil rights law. While “policy arguments” to amend the law “are very weighty, Kavangh wrote, and while he agreed that “gay and lbian Amerins nnot be treated as social outsts or as ferr digny and worth” he uld not si wh Gorsuch’s terpretatn. Gorsuch wrote the 6-3 cisn that the prohibn agast discrimatn on the basis of “sex” Tle VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act also appli to gay and transgenr employe.

FIRG OF GAY CATHOLIC SCHOOL TEACHER ULD TT LATT SUPREME COURT LG

Bh appotee who dissented agast the urt’s 2015 cisn legalizg gay marriage — some see his stance the LGBT se as a signifint parture om his reputatn as a stnch nservative jurist. Dpe his nservative bona fis, Gorsuch signaled early on the se that he was on the fence regardg the arguments of three employers who had fired workers for beg gay or transgenr. The employers, who were backed by the Tmp admistratn, argued that the 1964 civil rights law was not tend to protect gay and transgenr people om discrimatn.

GORSUCH: GAY MARRIAGE 'ABSOLUTELY SETTLED LAW.' SHOULD CONSERVATIV BE CONCERNED?

WASHINGTON () - In the send day of Supreme Court firmatn heargs, nomee Neil Gorsuch ntued to avoid answerg how he would le on specific issu, but some ments hted at his possible disagreement on High Court lgs on ntraceptn and gay marriage. Hodg, the 2015 Supreme Court lg legalizg gay "marriage, " as "settled law" and has ma efforts to appeal to LGBT voters durg the mpaign. The nomee was siarly terse when Delaware Democrat Chris Coons brought up the issue Wednday, aga clg to give his personal opns on gay marriage.

That Gorsuch is unwillg to say that the Court cisns legalizg gay marriage, abortn, and ntraceptn are anythg more than 'settled' suggts he do not believe extendg nstutnal protectn to social issu. That Gorsuch is unwillg to say that the Court cisns legalizg gay marriage, abortn and ntraceptn are anythg more than "settled" — refg to go so far as to say such s were "rightly cid — suggts he do not believe extendg nstutnal protectns to social issu. ”John Arthur, an ALS patient, and Jim Obergefell, partners for more than 20 years, are married on a medil plane Maryland Hartong / Ccnati Enquirer via AP fileAdvocy groups were quick to h back at the two nservative jtic, wh the Human Rights Campaign, the untry’s largt gay rights group, sayg a statement that Thomas and Alo had “renewed their war on LGBTQ rights and marriage equaly, as the urt hangs the balance.

Brad Polumbo, a journalist who is gay, recently wrote an article for The Washgton Examer which he argued that ncerns regardg Barrett are overblown. He relled the upset wh the LGBTQ muny over Jtice Neil Gorsuch’s nomatn, and — potg to Gorsuch’s vote favor of gay and transgenr rights June Bostock v. ”“She says she will not impose her personal beliefs on the law, and she will le for the law as is wrten, and I believe her bee she has a track rerd of dog that, as do many of the nservative jtic, ” he safe is gay marriage?

GORSUCH NOT EASY TO PIGEONHOLE ON GAY RIGHTS, FRIENDS SAY

He said he’s nfint we will not see a return of such laws, as even those not as explicly anti-gay as the one at the center of Lawrence v.

To go back on gay marriage now, Smh said, would e such a “polil taclysm that the urt would be very reluctant to take on such an unpopular posn. When Gallup first polled Amerins on the topic of gay marriage, 1996, only 27 percent said they were favor of also noted there was an crease support for workplace protectns for LGBTQ people, which the urt recently led favor of June’s Bostock cisn, termg that Tle VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects agast workplace discrimatn based on sexual orientatn and genr were surprised when Gorsuch, a Tmp appotee, voted favor of those protectns, and fact wrote the argued that many “misread Gorsuch, ” whom he lled “not your tradnal social nservative” but rather a “libertarian nservative, ” hence his cisn on that se g through a “pla readg of a statute rather than a large nstutnal exercise. Relig eedomBut if anti-gay laws are unlikely to make a eback, where should gay rights activists foc their attentn?