Why Are People Gay? Gay By Choice or Is Beg Gay Geic? | HealthyPlace

Contents:

• WHY ARE PEOPLE GAY? GAY BY CHOICE OR IS BEG GAY GEIC?
• MEANG OF GAY ENGLISH
• ABOUT THE CENTERSCE 1983 THE CENTER HAS BEEN SUPPORTG, FOSTERG AND CELEBRATG THE LGBT MUNY OF NEW YORK CY. FD MORE RMATN ON AND OUR WORK ABOUT THE CENTER. VIS ABOUT THE CENTEROUR MISSNCYBER CENTERCENTER HISTORYRACE EQUYMEDIA CENTERLEARSHIP & STAFFEMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNICORPORATE PARTNERSHIPSANNUAL REPORTS & FANCIAL INFORMATNCONTACT USHOURS & LOTNSEMAPSUPPORT THE CENTER
• WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN “GAY” AND “HOMOSEXUAL"? IS ONLY BY GENR?

WHY ARE PEOPLE GAY? GAY BY CHOICE OR IS BEG GAY GEIC?

Billy Eichner, noted homosexual, found himself the target of some odd gossip when a clickba article toutg his relatnship wh Noelle star Anna Kendrick went viral. Note: The adjective homosexual often appears formal wrg and medil wrg, but other suatns many people prefer to e the ls formal words gay or (for women) lbian.

MEANG OF GAY ENGLISH

It very much appears that same-sex sexual attractn is not a choice but actg on is; so if you fe gay as the mere prence of same-sex attractn, then om everythg we unrstand, beg gay is not a choice.

If, on the other hand, you nsir someone to be gay only if they act on their same-sex attractn then beg gay n be nsired a choice pendg on an dividual's behavr. Their ncln is that was a other words, the Biblil assertn that homosexualy is a s—the talyst for an entire shift culture, wh polil repercsns, relig implitns, nsequenc for LGBT rights and acceptance, and, ankly, adly rults—was, they allege, a a new film asserts, was “the mise of a sgle word that changed the urse of history. Moreover, there’s g to terms wh the notn that human error uld be rponsible for the stokg of homophobia—a mdset of hatred, opprsn, and relig natnalism that has fed the last 75 years of our anyone has even seen the film, there has been an anized effort to attack and bunk the film’s claims.

Porg over thoands of historil documents, centuri of ancient texts, and Bible translatns many languag, the experts the film nclu that two Greek words were mistranslated to mean homosexual. 12, we spoke wh Rogg about the work she did (along wh scholars and activists Kathy Baldock and Ed Oxford) to meticuloly substantiate the film’s claims, the challenge of gettg through to a Christian muny that ref even to hear the evince, and how a documentary like this uld change the the Thgs the Bible Wants to Execute You ForI grew up the church, but I am still someone who found the ia of “homosexual” beg a mistranslatn the Bible to be shockg. What we now see today is the dangers of Christian natnalism, and ’s only you talk more specifilly about the mistranslatn of the word “homosexual” and what happened there?

ABOUT THE CENTERSCE 1983 THE CENTER HAS BEEN SUPPORTG, FOSTERG AND CELEBRATG THE LGBT MUNY OF NEW YORK CY. FD MORE RMATN ON AND OUR WORK ABOUT THE CENTER. VIS ABOUT THE CENTEROUR MISSNCYBER CENTERCENTER HISTORYRACE EQUYMEDIA CENTERLEARSHIP & STAFFEMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNICORPORATE PARTNERSHIPSANNUAL REPORTS & FANCIAL INFORMATNCONTACT USHOURS & LOTNSEMAPSUPPORT THE CENTER

They say refers to nsensual acts, so ’s been amplified as homophobia bee of this my experience, I know there are many Christians who are unmovg their beliefs, who operate om a pot of bld fah. More specifilly terms of homosexualy, then, same-genr partners n at bt pretend to effect a differentiatn that is physlogilly (and perhaps psychologilly) theologians have suggted that to be created the image of God acrdg to Genis means to be social fellowship wh other persons. Others duce that homosexual relatns are merely an expansn of the tegory of marriage unr this bric of fellowship; that is, timacy and not blogy is the appropriate measure of nformy to the Genis marriage mol.

Conmnatns of sexual s the Old Ttament foc on heterosexual Acts, but is important to note that all sexual s, cludg homosexualy, is prohibed relatn to the posive mol of marriage prented Genis. Th, while the Old Ttament scrib homosexual activy as trsilly unjt or impure, the nmnatns do not differ qualatively om nmnatns of heterosexual viatns om the marriage first and most faiar Old Ttament passage is the acunt of tend male rape at Sodom ( Gen 19). Referenc to the cy later bee mon extrabiblil Jewish phemisms for sexual perversn general and homosexual practic particular ( the New Ttament, see 2 Peter 2:6-7; and Ju 7).

In the se of slavery, for example, the biblil msage is ambiguo; the se of homosexual Acts, on the other hand, what ltle material we have is all cidly negative. Some morn wrers have attempted to narrow s meang om homosexual Acts general to male prostutn, solicatn of male prostut, or (upled 1 Cor 6:9; wh malakoi, another obscure word possibly meang "the effemate") the active partners homosexual relatnships.

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN “GAY” AND “HOMOSEXUAL"? IS ONLY BY GENR?

Perhaps Pl himself, who knew and ed the Septuagt extensively, or some other Hellenistic Jew not long before Pl's time, rived om the passag Levic a pound word that scribed homosexual Acts general. This drawg of Levic to Pl's letters is also signifint that provis further monstratn that he perceived a moral and not merely pury-based prohibn of homosexual Acts the Old 1:26-27. While many morn revisnists simply disagree wh Pl or disunt his proscriptn as applyg only to prostutn or perasty, some have attempted to reterpret the passage as tac approval of homosexualy.