grammar - Havg a ‘gaydar’ means that you will easily regnize who is gay - English Language Learners Stack Exchange

Contents:

• IS ‘GAYDAR’ REALLY A THG?
• GAYDAR: DO YOU HAVE IT?
• THE TTH ABOUT ‘GAYDAR’
• THE SCIENCE OF “GAYDAR”: HOW WELL CAN WE DETECT OTHER PEOPLE’S SEXUAL ORIENTATN?
• HAVG A ‘GAYDAR’ MEANS THAT YOU WILL EASILY REGNIZE WHO IS GAY
• IS ‘GAYDAR’ REALLY A THG?
• GAYDAR
• HOW’S YOUR GAYDAR?
• TT YOUR GAYDAR
• GAYDAR
• GAYDAR
• MEANG OF GAYDAR ENGLISH

IS ‘GAYDAR’ REALLY A THG?

When they disver that he died of AIDS, Philomena says she always knew he was gay.

GAYDAR: DO YOU HAVE IT?

This kd of tun is often lled “gaydar” (a batn of “gay” and “radar. ”) However, skeptics dismiss gaydar as nothg more than a set of stereotyp about homosexuals that are largely unte.

THE TTH ABOUT ‘GAYDAR’

In a seri of experiments, he and his lleagu tted people’s abili to judge others’ sexual orientatn, and me to the ncln that gaydar is real. Rule claims that gaydar is jt like other social tuns.

THE SCIENCE OF “GAYDAR”: HOW WELL CAN WE DETECT OTHER PEOPLE’S SEXUAL ORIENTATN?

But how exactly do gaydar work? For example, homosexual men tend to be more meticulo about their clothg and hairstyle pared wh heterosexual mal. In a procs known as genr versn, gay men tend to sway their hips like straight women, while lbians tend to swagger their shoulrs like straight men.

HAVG A ‘GAYDAR’ MEANS THAT YOU WILL EASILY REGNIZE WHO IS GAY

Rule not that many people hold speech stereotyp about homosexuals, such as the belief that gay men lisp when they talk.

Aga, we see that gaydar works like other social tuns, that the stereotyp people nscly hold don’t match the featur their tuns tect at an unnsc level. The fact that facial featur provi visual cu to sexual orientatn lends support for epigeic theori that attribute homosexualy to prenatal experienc such as exposure to hormon utero. So seems que likely that Philomena uld have known that her ltle boy was gay, as she claims the movie.

IS ‘GAYDAR’ REALLY A THG?

Furthermore, people differ their gaydar abili. People wh strongly exprsed homophobia aren’t very accurate at judgg sexual orientatn, even though they thk they are. Straight people who have gay iends are more accurate their judgments, but they feel ls nfince their asssments.

And not surprisgly, gays and lbians are generally que accurate at judgg sexual orientatn.

In sum, gaydar really is a thg, that people are generally good at perceivg sexual orientatn om nonverbal cu. Rather, gaydar taps to the same “people sense” we e to quickly size up those we enunter our daily liv. Nothg illtrat this better than our apparent need to figure out who’s gay and who isn’t.

GAYDAR

Those who have the abily to divi the world to gay and non-gay are said to have gaydar, and you need not be gay to have . If you’re gay, then mak sense why you might want to know (support, romantic or sex partner, muny), but if you’re not, then ’s anyone’s gus.

Why we want or need to know who’s gay—to repulse , to igne cursy, not to marry one, to jo them—is not the issue this post. In one of the bt overviews of gaydar basics, Nicholas Rule and Rav Alaei simply state that we “rely on a variety of subtle cu that gui judgment and behavr, ” even whout nscly realizg what we are dog or what we are relyg on.

HOW’S YOUR GAYDAR?

Both gay and straight dividuals have gaydar, though to varyg gre.

TT YOUR GAYDAR

Rule and others, participants tegorized male fac as straight or gay better than chance (above 60% rather than a 50% chance level), even when the viewg time was merely one-twentieth of a send, fac didn’t differ emotnal exprsns, and hairstyl were cropped out.

GAYDAR

From the evince, many of the judgments were ma (whether nscly or not) based on a genr versn prciple—gay men as femized and lbians as masculized.

GAYDAR

For example, varyg om straight men, rearch shows that gay men have shorter nos, smaller nostrils and, varyg om straight women, lbians have thicker mouths and unrb. I n’t answer this qutn, and ’s a difficult one to terme bee we don’t know what means to rec “random” gays and lbians, pecially bee many might not intify as such (e.

MEANG OF GAYDAR ENGLISH

G., not aware they’re gay, are not sufficiently out to participate gay rearch, or don’t want to give their data).

For example, the gay photographs ed gaydar rearch are taken om “out” dividuals (on datg webs, Facebook, Craigslist). Might their genr versn have ed them to self-intify as gay/lbian and to have disclosed this fact?