If you have socks on ’s not gay, bee you’re not mted to the act. But if no socks are on then is gay bee you are mted to ." name="Dcriptn" property="og:scriptn
Contents:
BEWARE: ALL OF THE THGS ARE GAY
* it's not gay if you are wearing socks *
If you have socks on ’s not gay, bee you’re not mted to the act. But if no socks are on then is gay bee you are mted to homie was upset about not gettg head last night so John said fuck I got socks on I’ll suck ! He took up the ass by 6 dus that shs gay!
Nah he had socks on so ’s okay bee of the sock the Sock le you have 'socks on' your feet any homosexual actns or statements beg ma holds a stat of beg unniably 'not gay'. This le appli to past, prent, and future events that socks are worn at the time someone challeng if dividual is mtg an act that is gay, the dividual qutn mt quickly claim whether or not they have 'socks on' or not.
When I was 13 years old a buddy of me tried to nvce me to fool around. I wasn't to , and he told me 's not gay if you're wearg socks. I didn't believe him, went home, ... * it's not gay if you are wearing socks *
This is done to terme the orientatn(level of gay) of said event. A third part is allowed to ask if socks where worn if 'socks on' stat is not an actn or event is challenged, and if the dividual partakg the event or actn only has one sock on, the dividual qutn has the right to terme the effectivens of their sock g the chart two socks on is unniably 'not gay'.
Havg one sock on or socks that are loted beyond the feet regardls of amount are nsired ambiguo and is the rponsibily of the wearer to terme if was 'gay', 'partially gay', 'half gay', or 'not gay'.
Havg no socks on while performg or sayg somethg homosexual, will always hold the stat of one or more socks on your person while also not beg worn any way, holds no value. Person2: "That's gay!