A future gay widow of one of England’s most stately pil will have the same rights as their heterosexual peers, followg a landmark urt lg. But David Furnish will never get a tle for marryg Sir Elton.
Contents:
- BRISH ROYAL FAY'S FIRST GAY WEDDG: LORD MOUNTBATTEN TO MARRY JAM COYLE
- STEP FORWARD INTO PAST FOR BRISH GAY COUPL: COATS OF ARMS
- HOW LGBT EQUALY ARRIVED FOR BRISH ARISTOCRATSEQUALITYA FUTURE GAY WIDOW OF ONE OF ENGLAND’S MOST STATELY PIL WILL HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS AS THEIR HETEROSEXUAL PEERS, FOLLOWG A LANDMARK URT LG. BUT DAVID FURNISH WILL NEVER GET A TLE FOR MARRYG SIR ELTON.TOM SYKROYALIST CORRPONNTUPDATED APR. 13, 2017 3:26PM EDT / PUBLISHED JUL. 21, 2016 1:00AM EDT PL BROWN/ALAMY THE AGE OF EQUAL LGBT RIGHTS IS DAWNG—FALLY—ON THE VAST HERED FORTUN OF THE BRISH ARISTOCRACY, FOLLOWG A LANDMARK LG THAT SAME-SEX SPO WILL HAVE THE SAME HERANCE RIGHTS AS THEIR NVENTNALLY-MARRIED PEERS AT ONE OF THE U.K.’S MOST FAMO UNTRY TAT.THE PEMBERTON FAY, GUARDIANS OF THE 3,000-ACRE TATE OF TMPGTON HALL, NEAR CAMBRIDGE, ARE BELIEVED TO BE THE FIRST ARISTOCRATIC BRISH FAY TO HAVE CHANGED THE HERANCE L OF A FAY TST (WHICH NOMALLY NTROLS THE TATE) TO SPECIFILLY ALLOW WIDOWED SAME-SEX HBANDS AND WIV TO HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS AS OTHER WIDOWED PARTNERS.ACRDG TO A REPORT THE TIM, THE JUDGE LG ON THE MATTER MA CLEAR THAT THE ‘VARIATN’ OF THE TST WAS NOT BEG PROMPTED BY ANY SPECIFIC AWARENS THAT ANY OF THE PEMBERTON’S CHILDREN—WHO ARE AGED 14, 12 AND 10—HAVE INTIFIED AS GAY.THE FAY SAID URT THIS WEEK, THROUGH THEIR LAWYERS, THAT THEY BELIEVED THEY OWED “A MORAL OBLIGATN” TO FUTURE GENERATNS TO MAKE THE CHANGE AND HAVE REFED TO MENT FURTHER ON THE MATTER. THE FAY HAVE OWNED TMPGTON HALL, NEAR CAMBRIDGE, SCE 1715, WHEN THEY REPUTEDLY BOUGHT FOR A THOAND GOLD GUEAS.DPE THEIR STORIED HISTORY, THE PEMBERTONS ARE KNOWN FOR THEIR FORWARD-THKG NATURE—SCE RICHARD PEMBERTON, 46, TOOK OVER THE TATE 2007, HE HAS CREATED A 28-ACRE SOLAR FARM, ACRDG TO A REPORT THE TIM.NOW THEY HAVE BEE THE FIRST KNOWN ARISTOCRATIC FAY THE U.K. TO FORMALIZE LGBT RIGHTS FOR THEIR HEIRS AND THEIR POSSIBLE PARTNERS.THE PRCIPAL RULT OF THE CHANG MA BY THE PEMBERTONS IS LIKELY TO BE THAT A WIDOWED GAY PARTNER WILL RETA PROPERTY RIGHTS OVER THE TATE UNTIL THEIR ATH, OR AFTER THEY VOLUNTARILY HAND OVER THE RES TO THE NEXT GENERATN.THEY WILL EFFECTIVELY HAVE WHAT ARE SOMETIM QUATLY TERMED ‘DOWER RIGHTS’—THE VARY OM FAY TST TO FAY TST, BUT UALLY DOWAGER WIDOWS HAVE THE RIGHT TO EHER STAY ON THE BIG HOE OR (MORE OFTEN) A DOWER HOE ON THE TATE.THE PEMBERTONS MIGHT HAVE BEEN PROMPTED TO ACT BY A NEAR DISASTER 2010 WHEN A MISTAKE MA A LEGAL DOCUMENT—FOUR CCIAL WORDS, “AS REGARDS THE LEASE”, WERE LEFT OUT OF A ED BY MISTAKE—SIGNED TO MIGATE ATH DUTI NEARLY FORCED THEM TO SELL THEIR ANCTRAL HOME.WHILE ULD BE ARGUED THAT THE PEMBERTONS ARE MERELY FORMALIZG THEIR FAY TST WHAT HAS NOW BEE THE TABLISHED LAW THE U.K. (FOLLOWG THE LEGISLATN OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND CIVIL UNNS THE U.K., HERANCE L NOW SPECIFILLY APPLY TO SAME-SEX PARTNERS THE SAME WAY AS THEY DO TO ALL OTHER WIDOWED PARTNERS) THE ISSUE OF HOW GAY PARTNERS SHOULD BE TREATED WH THE PEERAGE IS STILL A BONE OF SOME NTENTN.DAVID FURNISH FAMOLY CLAIMED ’S UNFAIR THAT HE WAS NIED A URTY TLE WHEN HE AND SIR ELTON JOHN (WHO WAS KNIGHTED 1998) WED, AS A WOMAN THE SAME SUATN WOULD HAVE BEEN KNOWN AS ‘LADY JOHN’.“I AM FOR 100 PER CENT EQUALY ACROSS THE BOARD FOR EVERYBODY, ALL WALKS OF LIFE,” FURNISH TOLD SEBASTIAN SHAKPEARE OF THE DAILY MAIL. “THE REALY IS, IF A WOMAN IS MARRIED TO MAN WH A TLE, SHE GETS A TLE.”WHILE FURNISH’S POT IS PLETELY REASONABLE LOGILLY, SHOULD PERHAPS BE POTED OUT THAT THE BRISH HONORS SYSTEM IS NOT LOGIL. AND SUCH UNFAIRNS DO NOT APPLY ONLY TO GAY UPL—A WOMAN WHOUT A TLE WHO MARRI A DE BE A DUCHS, BUT A MAN WHOUT A TLE WHO MARRI A DUCHS STAYS PLA MR.GO FIGURE.FURNISH, AND OTHERS LIKE HIM, WILL BE WAG VA FOR A TLE—SUCH A PROSPECT WAS TEGORILLY LED OUT BY AN EXTENSIVE ‘TIDYG UP EXERCISE’ UNRTAKEN BY THE ERNMENT AHEAD OF THE GAY MARRIAGE LEGISLATN PASSG 2014, WHICH ALSO TOOK THE PREUTN OF ENSURG THAT A MAN NNOT BEE QUEEN, OR PRCS OF WAL, BY MARRYG THE KG OR THE PRCE OF WAL.A LEGAL ORR WAS SERTED TO BRISH LEGISLATN WHICH TEGORILLY LED THAT WHILE THE CHANGE THE LAW GAVE GAY AND HETEROSEXUAL MARAL PARTNERS THE SAME LEGAL STAT, DID NOT APPLY TO THE RIGHTS OF ANYONE “WHO MARRI, OR WHO IS MARRIED TO, THE KG REGNANT” AND LED OUT THE POSSIBILY OF D, EARLS, AND OTHER MALE PEERS WHO MARRY OTHER MEN WOULD SEE THEIR PARTNERS ENNOBLED.OVERALL, THE PEMBERTONS’ MOVE HAS BEEN WARMLY RECEIVED ARISTOCRATIC CIRCL, WHERE, ASTEREOTYPILLY PERHAPS, GAY MAN AND WOMEN HAVE LONG BEEN ACCEPTED AND CLUD MANY UPPER-CLASS FAI.LADY COL CAMPBELL TOLD THE DAILY BEAST: “I THK ’S A VERY NOBLE THG TO DO. IT WILL ALMOST CERTALY ONLY APPLY S OF WIDOWHOOD. TO ENSURE THAT THE WIDOWED PARTNER OF AN HEIR WOULD BE PROTECTED AND N REMA SU IS A VERY FAIR POSN TO TAKE.” TOM SYK
- I'M A BRISH ROYAL NAVY OFFICER — AND I'M GAY. I FEEL LIKE I'VE HAD TO WORK TWICE AS HARD AS MY STRAIGHT PEERS.
- LABOUR PEER MICHAEL CASHMAN, KNOWN FOR FIRST GAY KISS ON BRISH TELEVISN, TOPS RABOW LIST
- RISHI SUNAK APOLOGIS TO LGBT VETERANS FOR PAST ARMED FORC GAY BAN
BRISH ROYAL FAY'S FIRST GAY WEDDG: LORD MOUNTBATTEN TO MARRY JAM COYLE
* gay british peers *
Famo homosexuals om the Uned Kgdom are listed here for your rmatnal e. The members of the LGBT muny of Bra clu the Brish homosexuals listed here. Famo Brish gay people clu thor and edian Stephen Fry and lbian actrs Safon Burrows.
You n also e this list of notable gay Brs to start your own people Freebase / Public domaFreddie Mercury (born Farrokh Bulsara; 5 September 1946 – 24 November 1991) was a Brish sger, songwrer, rerd producer, and lead volist of the rock band Queen. However, his fay name giv him a higher profile Brish aristocratic circl; he is the great-nephew of Earl Mountbatten of Burma, the World War II naval manr who led Allied ary forc southeast a reflectn of social change, royal attus to homosexualy have progrsed sce 1960 when Jeremy Fry, Lord Snowdon’s choice of bt man for his weddg to Prcs Margaret, was vetoed after was disvered he had a nvictn for a “mor homosexual offense. ”Harry and Meghan, who wed on May 19, have ma clear their support of gay rights, reportedly tellg gay legat om across Bra’s former empire, the Commonwealth that they would put LGBT issu at the ont of their William last year received the annual Brish LGBT Awards’ Celebry Straight Ally award.
STEP FORWARD INTO PAST FOR BRISH GAY COUPL: COATS OF ARMS
In his acceptance vio, he lled out homophobic bullyg.
"William also ma history May 2016 as the first Brish royal to be featured on the ver a gay magaze. Europe|Step Forward Into Past for Brish Gay Coupl: Coats of Arms ADVERTISEMENTMay 9, 2014LONDON — First, same-sex upl Bra won the right to civil partnerships, then to full marriage.
HOW LGBT EQUALY ARRIVED FOR BRISH ARISTOCRATSEQUALITYA FUTURE GAY WIDOW OF ONE OF ENGLAND’S MOST STATELY PIL WILL HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS AS THEIR HETEROSEXUAL PEERS, FOLLOWG A LANDMARK URT LG. BUT DAVID FURNISH WILL NEVER GET A TLE FOR MARRYG SIR ELTON.TOM SYKROYALIST CORRPONNTUPDATED APR. 13, 2017 3:26PM EDT / PUBLISHED JUL. 21, 2016 1:00AM EDT PL BROWN/ALAMY THE AGE OF EQUAL LGBT RIGHTS IS DAWNG—FALLY—ON THE VAST HERED FORTUN OF THE BRISH ARISTOCRACY, FOLLOWG A LANDMARK LG THAT SAME-SEX SPO WILL HAVE THE SAME HERANCE RIGHTS AS THEIR NVENTNALLY-MARRIED PEERS AT ONE OF THE U.K.’S MOST FAMO UNTRY TAT.THE PEMBERTON FAY, GUARDIANS OF THE 3,000-ACRE TATE OF TMPGTON HALL, NEAR CAMBRIDGE, ARE BELIEVED TO BE THE FIRST ARISTOCRATIC BRISH FAY TO HAVE CHANGED THE HERANCE L OF A FAY TST (WHICH NOMALLY NTROLS THE TATE) TO SPECIFILLY ALLOW WIDOWED SAME-SEX HBANDS AND WIV TO HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS AS OTHER WIDOWED PARTNERS.ACRDG TO A REPORT THE TIM, THE JUDGE LG ON THE MATTER MA CLEAR THAT THE ‘VARIATN’ OF THE TST WAS NOT BEG PROMPTED BY ANY SPECIFIC AWARENS THAT ANY OF THE PEMBERTON’S CHILDREN—WHO ARE AGED 14, 12 AND 10—HAVE INTIFIED AS GAY.THE FAY SAID URT THIS WEEK, THROUGH THEIR LAWYERS, THAT THEY BELIEVED THEY OWED “A MORAL OBLIGATN” TO FUTURE GENERATNS TO MAKE THE CHANGE AND HAVE REFED TO MENT FURTHER ON THE MATTER. THE FAY HAVE OWNED TMPGTON HALL, NEAR CAMBRIDGE, SCE 1715, WHEN THEY REPUTEDLY BOUGHT FOR A THOAND GOLD GUEAS.DPE THEIR STORIED HISTORY, THE PEMBERTONS ARE KNOWN FOR THEIR FORWARD-THKG NATURE—SCE RICHARD PEMBERTON, 46, TOOK OVER THE TATE 2007, HE HAS CREATED A 28-ACRE SOLAR FARM, ACRDG TO A REPORT THE TIM.NOW THEY HAVE BEE THE FIRST KNOWN ARISTOCRATIC FAY THE U.K. TO FORMALIZE LGBT RIGHTS FOR THEIR HEIRS AND THEIR POSSIBLE PARTNERS.THE PRCIPAL RULT OF THE CHANG MA BY THE PEMBERTONS IS LIKELY TO BE THAT A WIDOWED GAY PARTNER WILL RETA PROPERTY RIGHTS OVER THE TATE UNTIL THEIR ATH, OR AFTER THEY VOLUNTARILY HAND OVER THE RES TO THE NEXT GENERATN.THEY WILL EFFECTIVELY HAVE WHAT ARE SOMETIM QUATLY TERMED ‘DOWER RIGHTS’—THE VARY OM FAY TST TO FAY TST, BUT UALLY DOWAGER WIDOWS HAVE THE RIGHT TO EHER STAY ON THE BIG HOE OR (MORE OFTEN) A DOWER HOE ON THE TATE.THE PEMBERTONS MIGHT HAVE BEEN PROMPTED TO ACT BY A NEAR DISASTER 2010 WHEN A MISTAKE MA A LEGAL DOCUMENT—FOUR CCIAL WORDS, “AS REGARDS THE LEASE”, WERE LEFT OUT OF A ED BY MISTAKE—SIGNED TO MIGATE ATH DUTI NEARLY FORCED THEM TO SELL THEIR ANCTRAL HOME.WHILE ULD BE ARGUED THAT THE PEMBERTONS ARE MERELY FORMALIZG THEIR FAY TST WHAT HAS NOW BEE THE TABLISHED LAW THE U.K. (FOLLOWG THE LEGISLATN OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND CIVIL UNNS THE U.K., HERANCE L NOW SPECIFILLY APPLY TO SAME-SEX PARTNERS THE SAME WAY AS THEY DO TO ALL OTHER WIDOWED PARTNERS) THE ISSUE OF HOW GAY PARTNERS SHOULD BE TREATED WH THE PEERAGE IS STILL A BONE OF SOME NTENTN.DAVID FURNISH FAMOLY CLAIMED ’S UNFAIR THAT HE WAS NIED A URTY TLE WHEN HE AND SIR ELTON JOHN (WHO WAS KNIGHTED 1998) WED, AS A WOMAN THE SAME SUATN WOULD HAVE BEEN KNOWN AS ‘LADY JOHN’.“I AM FOR 100 PER CENT EQUALY ACROSS THE BOARD FOR EVERYBODY, ALL WALKS OF LIFE,” FURNISH TOLD SEBASTIAN SHAKPEARE OF THE DAILY MAIL. “THE REALY IS, IF A WOMAN IS MARRIED TO MAN WH A TLE, SHE GETS A TLE.”WHILE FURNISH’S POT IS PLETELY REASONABLE LOGILLY, SHOULD PERHAPS BE POTED OUT THAT THE BRISH HONORS SYSTEM IS NOT LOGIL. AND SUCH UNFAIRNS DO NOT APPLY ONLY TO GAY UPL—A WOMAN WHOUT A TLE WHO MARRI A DE BE A DUCHS, BUT A MAN WHOUT A TLE WHO MARRI A DUCHS STAYS PLA MR.GO FIGURE.FURNISH, AND OTHERS LIKE HIM, WILL BE WAG VA FOR A TLE—SUCH A PROSPECT WAS TEGORILLY LED OUT BY AN EXTENSIVE ‘TIDYG UP EXERCISE’ UNRTAKEN BY THE ERNMENT AHEAD OF THE GAY MARRIAGE LEGISLATN PASSG 2014, WHICH ALSO TOOK THE PREUTN OF ENSURG THAT A MAN NNOT BEE QUEEN, OR PRCS OF WAL, BY MARRYG THE KG OR THE PRCE OF WAL.A LEGAL ORR WAS SERTED TO BRISH LEGISLATN WHICH TEGORILLY LED THAT WHILE THE CHANGE THE LAW GAVE GAY AND HETEROSEXUAL MARAL PARTNERS THE SAME LEGAL STAT, DID NOT APPLY TO THE RIGHTS OF ANYONE “WHO MARRI, OR WHO IS MARRIED TO, THE KG REGNANT” AND LED OUT THE POSSIBILY OF D, EARLS, AND OTHER MALE PEERS WHO MARRY OTHER MEN WOULD SEE THEIR PARTNERS ENNOBLED.OVERALL, THE PEMBERTONS’ MOVE HAS BEEN WARMLY RECEIVED ARISTOCRATIC CIRCL, WHERE, ASTEREOTYPILLY PERHAPS, GAY MAN AND WOMEN HAVE LONG BEEN ACCEPTED AND CLUD MANY UPPER-CLASS FAI.LADY COL CAMPBELL TOLD THE DAILY BEAST: “I THK ’S A VERY NOBLE THG TO DO. IT WILL ALMOST CERTALY ONLY APPLY S OF WIDOWHOOD. TO ENSURE THAT THE WIDOWED PARTNER OF AN HEIR WOULD BE PROTECTED AND N REMA SU IS A VERY FAIR POSN TO TAKE.” TOM SYK
If the College of Arms accepts an applitn, s heralds will sign the arms wh the guidance of the bearer at a st of 5, 250 pounds, or about $8, gay rights group Stonewall weled the change. While the wiv of lords or barons tomatilly bee ladi or barons, the partners of gay members of the Hoe of Lords are still nied this privilege, as are the partners of female peers, whatever their sexual are several openly gay peers the Hoe of Lords.
Compared to issu like, say, mpaigns agast antigay legislatn plac like Uganda, Nigeria and Rsia, securg tl for partners of “gay members of the Hoe of Lords is not exactly a prry, ” said Mr.
”A versn of this article appears prt on, Sectn A, Page 4 of the New York edn wh the headle: Step Forward Into Past for Brish Gay Coupl: Coats of Arms.
I'M A BRISH ROYAL NAVY OFFICER — AND I'M GAY. I FEEL LIKE I'VE HAD TO WORK TWICE AS HARD AS MY STRAIGHT PEERS.
To formalize LGBT rights for their heirs and their possible prcipal rult of the chang ma by the Pembertons is likely to be that a widowed gay partner will reta property rights over the tate until their ath, or after they voluntarily hand over the res to the next will effectively have what are sometim quatly termed ‘dower rights’—the vary om fay tst to fay tst, but ually dowager widows have the right to eher stay on the big hoe or (more often) a dower hoe on the Pembertons might have been prompted to act by a near disaster 2010 when a mistake ma a legal document—four ccial words, “as regards the lease”, were left out of a ed by mistake—signed to migate ath duti nearly forced them to sell their anctral uld be argued that the Pembertons are merely formalizg their fay tst what has now bee the tablished law the U. K., herance l now specifilly apply to same-sex partners the same way as they do to all other widowed partners) the issue of how gay partners should be treated wh the peerage is still a bone of some Furnish famoly claimed ’s unfair that he was nied a urty tle when he and Sir Elton John (who was knighted 1998) wed, as a woman the same suatn would have been known as ‘Lady John’.
LABOUR PEER MICHAEL CASHMAN, KNOWN FOR FIRST GAY KISS ON BRISH TELEVISN, TOPS RABOW LIST
And such unfairns do not apply only to gay upl—a woman whout a tle who marri a De be a Duchs, but a man whout a tle who marri a Duchs stays pla figure. Furnish, and others like him, will be wag va for a tle—such a prospect was tegorilly led out by an extensive ‘tidyg up exercise’ unrtaken by the ernment ahead of the gay marriage legislatn passg 2014, which also took the preutn of ensurg that a man nnot bee Queen, or Prcs of Wal, by marryg the Kg or the Prce of Wal.
RISHI SUNAK APOLOGIS TO LGBT VETERANS FOR PAST ARMED FORC GAY BAN
A legal orr was serted to Brish legislatn which tegorilly led that while the change the law gave gay and heterosexual maral partners the same legal stat, did not apply to the rights of anyone “who marri, or who is married to, the Kg Regnant” and led out the possibily of D, Earls, and other male peers who marry other men would see their partners ennobled.