McLennan County Jtice of the Peace Dianne Hensley filed a lawsu after a state agency warned her about refg to marry gay upl. She hop a recent U.S. Supreme Court se about relig eedom helps her e.
Contents:
- GAY BARS AND GAY RIGHTS
- A GAY UPLE RAN A RAL RTRANT PEACE. THEN NEW NEIGHBORS ARRIVED.
- THE MAN NAMED THE SUPREME COURT’S GAY RIGHTS LG SAYS HE DIDN’T REQUT A WEDDG WEBSE
- LEGIMACY OF ‘CTOMER’ SUPREME COURT GAY RIGHTS SE RAIS ETHIL AND LEGAL FLAGS
- PHILALPHIA GAY BAR BOUNCER FAC MURR CHARGE FOR PUNCHG PATRON
- GAY UPLE WS SE AGAST FLORIST AFTER SUPREME COURT REJECTS APPEAL
- WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT A SEEMGLY FAKE DOCUMENT A GAY RIGHTS CASE
- TEXAS JUDGE WHO DON’T WANT TO PERFORM GAY MARRIAGE CEREMONI HOP WEB SIGNER’S SUPREME COURT SE HELPS HER FIGHT
GAY BARS AND GAY RIGHTS
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday livered a watershed victory for LGBT rights and a feat for Print Donald Tmp's admistratn by lg that a longstandg feral law barrg workplace discrimatn protects gay and transgenr employe. * gay bar court case *
Gay bars, one of the few public plac of ngregatn for LGBTQ+ people before the Stonewall rebelln of 1969, were flash pots for the crimalizatn of same-sex sexual nduct, acrdg to legal scholar Patricia A. Ca’s history of ligatn for lbian and gay rights.
Addnally, a broad terpretatn of “homosexual acts” the twentieth century ma “lbians and gay men thk of themselv as crimals jt for beg who they were, ” wr Ca. In what Ca lls the first “succsful Amerin ‘gay rights’ se, ” 1951, the California Supreme Court led Stoumen v.
The state liquor thory had “acted arbrarily termg that the mere prence of homosexuals a public bar was a threat to public welfare and morals. ” The urt nclud that the state uldn’t nflate homosexual stat and homosexual nduct. ” Dpe Stoumen, the laws would be ed to harass and close gay bars until the laws were clared unnstutnal, 1959.
A GAY UPLE RAN A RAL RTRANT PEACE. THEN NEW NEIGHBORS ARRIVED.
A Colorado web signer who the U.S. Supreme Court led uld refe to make a weddg webse for gay upl had ced a requt om a man who says he never asked to work wh her. * gay bar court case *
Department of Alhol Beverage Control required “somethg more” than the mere prence of homosexuals a California bar for thori to revoke a liquor license.
” Such ambiguo wordg kept the door open to closg gay bars, even if g liquor licensg to do so beme ls and ls viable.
In 1967, Miami prohibed issug liquor licens to tablishments that employed homosexuals, sold liquor to homosexuals, or allowed two or more homosexuals to ngregate on the premis. That same year, 1967, New York and New Jersey followed the California ia of a difference between homosexual stat and homosexual nduct. Homosexual nduct, that ambiguo phrase, uld still be the e of a police raid, however.
THE MAN NAMED THE SUPREME COURT’S GAY RIGHTS LG SAYS HE DIDN’T REQUT A WEDDG WEBSE
A Christian graphic artist who the Supreme Court said n refe to make weddg webs for gay upl poted durg her lawsu to a requt om a man named “Stewart” and his hband-to-be. * gay bar court case *
The “Stonewall Rt” begng June 28, 1969, marked a turng pot the morn gay rights movement.
LEGIMACY OF ‘CTOMER’ SUPREME COURT GAY RIGHTS SE RAIS ETHIL AND LEGAL FLAGS
A supposed requt for a webse for a same-sex weddg played a mor role a major clash between ee speech and gay rights at the Supreme Court. * gay bar court case *
Supreme Court on Monday livered a watershed victory for LGBT rights and a feat for Print Donald Tmp’s admistratn by lg that a longstandg feral law barrg workplace discrimatn protects gay and transgenr landmark 6-3 lg reprented the biggt moment for LGBT rights the Uned Stat sce the Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage natnwi 2015.
Two nservative jtic joed the urt’s four liberals the cisn: Neil Gorsuch, a 2017 Tmp appotee who wrote the lg, and Chief Jtice John jtic cid that gay and transgenr people are protected unr Tle VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars employers om discrimatg agast employe on the basis of sex as well as race, lor, natnal orig and relign. Workplace bias agast gay and transgenr employe had remaed legal much of the untry, wh 28 U. The lg - two gay rights s om Geia and New York and a transgenr rights se om Michigan - regniz new worker protectns feral legal fight foced on the fn of “sex” Tle VII.
PHILALPHIA GAY BAR BOUNCER FAC MURR CHARGE FOR PUNCHG PATRON
The urt agreed wh the platiffs that discrimatg agast gay and transgenr workers was herently based on their sex and nsequently was illegal.
GAY UPLE WS SE AGAST FLORIST AFTER SUPREME COURT REJECTS APPEAL
” Supported by evangelil Christian voters, Tmp has taken actns that have unrmed gay and transgenr rights sce takg office activists and the only survivg platiff the ligatn ld the lg. “I tly believe I went to shock this morng, ” said Gerald Bostock, who brought the Geia se after losg his job as a unty ernment child welfare servic ordator months after jog the lol gay-iendly Hotlanta Softball League.
WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT A SEEMGLY FAKE DOCUMENT A GAY RIGHTS CASE
“Amerins mt be able to rely on what the law says, and is disappotg that a majory of the jtic were unwillg to affirm that monsense prciple, ” said John Bursch, a lawyer wh the Alliance Defendg Freedom, a nservative Christian legal group that reprented the employer the Michigan ’s admistratn joed the employers argug that Congrs did not tend for Tle VII to protect gay and transgenr people when passed the law.
‘A NECESSARY AND UNDISGUISABLE ROLE’“An employer who fir an dividual for beg homosexual or transgenr fir that person for tras or actns would not have qutned members of a different sex, ” Gorsuch wrote.
”Gorsuch, who signaled sympathy toward the platiffs durg arguments the se October, wrote that “there is no way an employer n discrimate agast those who check the homosexual or transgenr box whout discrimatg part bee of an applint’s sex. ”Roberts, nsired the iologil center of the urt, backed gay rights this se after dissentg the gay marriage lg.
TEXAS JUDGE WHO DON’T WANT TO PERFORM GAY MARRIAGE CEREMONI HOP WEB SIGNER’S SUPREME COURT SE HELPS HER FIGHT
Alphonso David, print of the Human Rights Campaign gay rights group, said, “No one should be nied a job or fired simply bee of who they are or whom they love.
”“By discrimatg agast homosexuals, ” Gorsuch wrote, “the employer tentnally penaliz men for beg attracted to men and women for beg attracted to women.