Supreme Court Rul Bs Can Discrimate Agast Gay People – Rollg Stone

Contents:

• SUPREME COURT TO CI WHETHER SOME BS N REFE TO SERVE GAY CTOMERS
• THE SUPREME COURT’S RULG ON REFG GAY BS
• SUPREME COURT WON'T OVERTURN LG AGAST BS THAT REFED SERVICE FOR GAY WEDDGS
• SUPREME COURT RUL BS CAN DISCRIMATE AGAST GAY PEOPLE

SUPREME COURT TO CI WHETHER SOME BS N REFE TO SERVE GAY CTOMERS

" Web signer Smh not that she has created webs for gay and lbian clients sellg other products and servic, but that she believ marriage is between a man and a woman.

The Supreme Court said Tuday will ci whether certa bs wh relig objectns n refe to offer their servic for same-sex weddgs, a qutn has nsistently ducked sce s landmark gay marriage lg se volv a Colorado webse signer, Lorie Smh, who planned to expand her bs to serve upl gettg married. "The ADF is untg on you to jo them seeg the LGBTQ muny as an outsized threat pared to the actual percentage of adult Amerins who intify as lbian, gay, bisexual or transgenr, " Greenmh Supreme Court's cisn the se is "yet another weapon the arsenal or arm of the octop" of the "same people who are phg the legislatn, " Greenmh Amerins support LGBTQ rights, surveys fdAnother recent survey also found most Amerins support nondiscrimatn protectns for LGBTQ Amerin adults – cludg two-thirds of those intifyg as Catholics or Christians – disagree wh relig-based nial of medil re, employment or other servic to LGBTQ dividuals, acrdg to a September 2022 survey nducted by the Universy of Chigo partnership wh the Williams Instute, a thk tank dited to genr inty and sexual orientatn rearch at the Universy of California Los Angel School of, pollg that asks qutns on the right of a bs owner to refe service based on their relig beliefs shows more mixed rults.

THE SUPREME COURT’S RULG ON REFG GAY BS

AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTlettersImageLorie Smh, center, said her Christian fah required her to turn away ctomers seekg servic to celebrate same-sex Moneymaker/Getty ImagTo the Edor:Re “Web Digner Ws Right to Turn Away Gay People” (ont page, July 1):Given the Supreme Court’s track rerd throughout the past year — cludg, most notably, the guttg of affirmative actn and feral abortn protectns — I shouldn’t have been surprised when, along iologil l, led favor of a web signer who would refe a same-sex uple seekg her servic. The day when signs readg “Gays not served here” bee a realy. There are those wh scerely held relig beliefs who ce scriptural referenc that support segregatn of the rac, as do those who jtify their anti-gay bias this manner.

It would be sweet jtice if the Thomas were nied service when they try to orr an anniversary other words, this is a slippery BudzskiEvanston, the Edor:Re “Christians and Drag Queens Both Defend the First Amendment, ” by David French (lumn, July 1):I agree that eedom of speech clus both lettg someone give hateful speech (if not cg vlence) and also not forcg someone to speak agast their said, how is a web signer who creat a weddg page for a gay uple seen as beg forced to speak agast her nscience? The speech is the gay uple’s, not hers. Greg Abbott of Texas as he signed fentanyl legislatn bills on June Gay/Associated PrsTo the Edor:Re “Punive Laws Over Fentanyl Renew a Fight” (ont page, June 23):The overdose crisis is vastatg muni across this untry, but puttg people jail don’t crease dg e.

A versn of this article appears prt on, Sectn A, Page 19 of the New York edn wh the headle: Jtic’ Rulg on Refg Gay Bs. Supreme Court led Friday uld refe to make weddg webs for gay upl ced a requt om a man who says he never asked to work wh her. The revelatn distracts om Smh's victory at a time when she might have been baskg her w, which is wily nsired a setback for gay rights.

SUPREME COURT WON'T OVERTURN LG AGAST BS THAT REFED SERVICE FOR GAY WEDDGS

Supreme Court victory after refg to make a gay uple's weddg ke, cg his Christian fah. “The worry is that this provis a green light to any bs owner that they n refe service to any person on the basis of their inty, whether they’re gay or lbian, or Jewish or Black, or anythg, bee they have an objectn to those sorts of people beg their bs, ” said Kathere Franke, a profsor at Columbia Law School. In 2020, Gorsuch livered a massive w to the LGBTQ muny when he livered the majory opn a se that extend feral protectns to gay, lbian and transgenr workers.

The New Republic spoke to the "gay" man the se, who says he's straight and married wh children.

SUPREME COURT RUL BS CAN DISCRIMATE AGAST GAY PEOPLE

The Supreme Court led Thursday that the owner of a weddg webse Colorado n refe to provi service to LGBTQ upl bee vlat her relig an alleged requt ced the se appears to be ma webse owner, Lorie Smh, said she got a requt om a gay uple — "Stewart and Mike" — but The New Republic tracked down Stewart, who says he never asked her to make him a webse. ”Ria Tabac Mar, an Amerin Civil Liberti Unn lawyer who reprented the gay uple, said the nial is a remr that “no one should walk to a store and have to wonr whether they will be turned away bee of who they are.

"The First Amendment vlatns mt stop, ” they the ACLU, reprentg Washgton state, said Stutzman is not required to participate any actual same-sex weddg state also told the urt that the florist ref to prepare any flower arrangement for the weddg of a gay or lbian uple, even if the arrangement is intil to one the shop’s employe would prepare for a heterosexual uple. "It is th clear that their objectn is not to any 'msage' sent by the flowers themselv, but rather to the msage they perceive would be sent by servg a gay uple, " lawyers for the state ACLU said urts have repeatedly led that there is no right to be exempt, on relig eedom grounds, om general laws that are not enacted to disfavor relig beliefs.