Gay Defn & Meang - Merriam-Webster

Contents:

• GAY
• ACTIVISTS NMN VLENCE AGAST LGBTQ MUNY ST. VCENT, WHERE GAY SEX IS ILLEGAL

GAY

AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTThe judgment was issued rponse to qutns om some pastors and parish that sought to be more welg and clive of gay Fstaci/EPA, via ShutterstockPublished March 15, 2021Updated June 27, 2021ROME — The Vatin said on Monday that prits uld not bls same-sex unns, llg any such blsg “not lic.

”The lg said that the church should be welg toward gay people, “wh rpect and sensivy, ” but not endorse their Congregatn for the Doctre of the Fah, the Vatin’s doctral watchdog, issued the judgment rponse to qutns raised by some pastors and parish that sought to be more welg and clive of gay issue of clivens me to the fore recent years after the pope asked bishops to velop projects and proposals “so that those who manift a homosexual orientatn n receive the assistance they need to unrstand and fully rry out God’s will their liv. Cardal Ladaria wrote that Pope Francis, who has stnchly opposed gay marriage the church, had given “his assent to the publitn. ”In the Uned Stat, where more than 6 out of 10 Catholics support same-sex marriage, acrdg to a 2019 Pew survey, many gay Catholics and their advot mourned the announcement, and said would evably lead to more gay people and those who support them leavg the church.

”Francis DeBernardo, the executive director of New Ways Mistry who has been an advote for gay Catholics for four s, noted that “prits parish” were already celebratg such blsgs.

ACTIVISTS NMN VLENCE AGAST LGBTQ MUNY ST. VCENT, WHERE GAY SEX IS ILLEGAL

” when asked durg a papal flight om Brazil about prits who might be gay.

The Vatin later clarified that the pope believed that gay upl served civil protectns, cludg legal rights and health re benefs, but that his ments had not marked a change church Catholic Church nsirs homosexual acts “trsilly disorred. ” In 2003, the Congregatn for the Doctre of the Fah led that the church’s “rpect for homosexual persons nnot lead any way to approval of homosexual behavr or to legal regnn of homosexual unns. ” That document, which was signed by Cardal Joseph Ratzger, then the prefect of the ngregatn and who went on to bee Pope Benedict XVI, sought to sway Catholic lawmakers as an creasg number of untri were ratifyg legal rights for same-sex the lg ma public on Monday, the Vatin said that Catholic teachg held that marriage between a man and woman was part of God’s plan, and that sce gay unns were not tend to be part of that plan, they uld not be blsed by the explag the lg on Monday, the Vatin said that relatnships volvg “sexual activy outsi of marriage, ” which the Vatin scribed as an “dissoluble unn of a man and a woman open self to the transmissn of life” did not follow the “Creator’s plans, ” even if those relatnships had “posive elements.

In fact, “there are absolutely no grounds for nsirg homosexual unns to be any way siar or even remotely analogo to God’s plan for marriage and fay, ” the Vatin wrote, cg Pope Francis’ landmark 2016 document on the theme of fay, “Amoris Laetia, ” or “The Joy of Love. “That le particular is gog to e tremendo pa and anger, ” said Marianne Duddy-Burke, executive director of DignyUSA, a natnal advocy group for gay Catholics. ROME — The Vatin says Pope Francis’ ments on gay civil unns were taken out of ntext a documentary that spliced together parts of an old terview, but still nfirmed Francis’ belief that gay upl should enjoy legal Vatin secretariat of state issued guidance to ambassadors to expla the uproar that Francis’ ments created followg the Oct.

Instead, he favored extendg legal protectns to gay upl unr what is unrstood Argenta as a civil unn Francis was known to have taken that posn privately, he had never articulated his support while as pope.

The document, signed by Francis’ precsor as pope, says the church’s support for gay people “nnot lead any way to approval of homosexual behavr or to legal regnn of homosexual unns. “More than a year ago, durg an terview, Pope Francis answered two different qutns at two different tim that, the aforementned documentary, were eded and published as a sgle answer whout proper ntextualizatn, which has led to nfn, ” said the guidance posted by the film, Afeevsky reunts the story of Andrea Rubera, a married gay Catholic who wrote Francis askg for his advice about brgg to the church his three young children wh his was an anguished qutn, given that the Catholic Church teach that gay people mt be treated wh digny and rpect but that homosexual acts are “trsilly disorred. ” The church also holds that marriage is an dissoluble unn between man and woman, and as a rult, gay marriage is the end, Rubera reunts how Francis urged him to approach his parish transparently and brg the children up the fah, which he did.

”Francis’ ments about gays havg the right to be a fay referred to parents wh gay children, and the need for them to not kick their children out or discrimate agast them, the Vatin guidance said. Francis was not endorsg the right of gay upl to adopt children, even though the placement of the quote right after Rubera told his story ma seem that Francis pope’s ments about gay civil unns me om a different part of the Televisa terview and clud several veats that were not clud the the Televisa terview, Francis ma clear he was explag his posn about the unique se Buenos Air 10 years ago, as opposed to Rubera’s suatn or gay marriage as a the Televisa terview, Francis also sisted that he always mataed Catholic doctre and said there was an “ngy” for the Catholic Church as far as “homosexual marriage” is documentary elimated that Televisa footage is available onle, and clus an awkward cut right after Francis spoke about the “ngy” of homosexual marriage. Prumably, that is where he segued to his posn as archbishop favorg extendg legal protectns to gay upl.