US Supreme Court Rul In Favour Of Baker Who Refed To Serve Gay Couple

That is absolutely no different om refg to serve gay and lbian upl orrg a weddg on Jack Phillips for promotg prejudice his bs. We have no right to impose our personal valu when we are bs to sell to the WEINSTOCK, NEW YORKTo the Edor:I am pletely agast discrimatn and have joyfully officiated at many gay weddgs sce I married and th was eligible to ntue as a prit.

Also, would a lg om the Supreme Court require creatg a ke for the lol chapter of the Ku Klux Klan wh s hallmark racial and relig prejudice or the Wtboro Baptist Church wh s od anti-gay msage? A versn of this article appears prt on, Sectn A, Page 26 of the New York edn wh the headle: The Baker Who Refed to Serve a Gay Couple. Colorado Baker Jack Phillips had refed to serve a gay uple when they walked to his shop 2012.

U.S. SUPREME COURT BACKS CHRISTIAN BAKER WHO REBUFFED GAY UPLE

The US Supreme Court livered a historic but limed victory Monday to a Colorado baker who refed to sign a weddg ke for a same-sex uple, a closely-watched se ptg gay rights agast relig a 7-2 cisn, the high urt led that while the Colorado Civil Rights Commissn termed that Masterpiece Cakhop mt serve clients regardls of sexual orientatn, the panel showed "clear and impermissible hostily" toward the baker's relig missn's bias therefore vlated baker Jack Phillips's rights unr the US Constutn's First Amendment, the jtic they did not fively le on the issue of whether a bs n cle to serve gays and lbians based on relig views, meang the broar ntent issue is likely to Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage natnwi 2015, and Colorado law prohibs discrimatn on the basis of sexual orientatn. "The oute of s like this other circumstanc mt awa further elaboratn the urts, all the ntext of regnizg that the disput mt be rolved wh tolerance, whout undue disrpect to scere relig beliefs and whout subjectg gay persons to digni when they seek goods and servic an open market.

IN NARROW OPN, SUPREME COURT RUL FOR BAKER IN GAY-RIGHTS CASE

"He noted that the panel's "official exprsns of hostily to relign" was "nsistent" wh s strict requirement for liberal jtic, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan, joed the nservativ the majory lg on the most signifint se for gay rights sce the high urt approved same-sex marriage.

"A person should be ee to refe to be ed as a mouthpiece for an objectnable msage, " he December, Phillips's lawyers argued before the urt that while the baker was perfectly willg to sell ready-ma products to anyone, a weddg ke n be nsired artistic exprsn, and such creatns n exprs a msage -- somethg Phillips was not prepared to do for a gay ke se beme a flashpot Amerin polil circl recent years, wh Republin lawmakers eager to plant the flag of relig eedom backg the baker. Supreme Court on Monday hand a victory on narrow grounds to a Colorado baker who refed based on his Christian beliefs to make a weddg ke for a gay uple, stoppg short of settg a major precent allowg people to claim relig exemptns om anti-discrimatn jtic, a 7-2 cisn, said the Colorado Civil Rights Commissn showed an impermissible hostily toward relign when found that baker Jack Phillips vlated the state’s anti-discrimatn law by rebuffg gay uple David Mulls and Charlie Craig 2012. The cisn also did not addrs important claims raised the se cludg whether bakg a ke is a kd of exprsive act protected by the Constutn’s ee speech of the urt’s four liberals, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan, joed the five nservative jtic the lg thored by Jtice Anthony Kennedy, who also wrote the landmark 2015 cisn legalizg gay marriage baker se beme a cultural flashpot the Uned Stat, unrsrg the tensns between gay rights proponents and nservative sis claimed a measure of victory.

IN NARROW LG, SUPREME COURT GIV VICTORY TO BAKER WHO REFED TO MAKE KE FOR GAY WEDDG

The uple’s supporters noted that the lg embraced the importance of gay rights and ma clear that bs open to the public mt serve everyone. “Our society has e to the regnn that gay persons and gay upl nnot be treated as social outsts or as ferr digny and worth, ” Kennedy Kennedy said the state missn’s hostily toward relign “was nsistent wh the First Amendment’s guarantee that our laws be applied a manner that is ntral toward relign.

SUPREME COURT L FAVOR OF BAKER WHO WOULD NOT MAKE WEDDG KE FOR GAY UPLE

”Kennedy said the missn led the oppose way three s brought agast bakers which the bs owners refed to bake k ntag msag that meaned gay people or same-sex marriage.

“The First Amendment prohibs ernments om discrimatg agast cizens on the basis of relig beliefs, ” Attorney General Jeff Ssns said a cisn ma clear that even if the urt ultimately l a future se that bakers or other bs that sell creative products such as florists and weddg photographers n avoid punishment unr anti-discrimatn laws, most bs open to the public would have no such the 50 stat, 21 cludg Colorado have anti-discrimatn laws protectg gay se marked a tt for Kennedy, who has thored signifint lgs that advanced gay rights but also is a strong advote for ee speech rights and relig eedom.

“The oute of s like this other circumstanc mt awa further elaboratn the urts, all the ntext of regnizg that the disput mt be rolved wh tolerance, whout undue disrpect to scere relig beliefs, and whout subjectg gay persons to digni when they seek goods and servic an open market, ” Kennedy a wrten dissent, Jtice Ruth Bar Gsburg, joed by fellow liberal Sonia Sotomayor, said what mattered was that Phillips would not provi a good or service to a same-sex uple that he would provi to a heterosexual ligatn, along wh siar s around the untry, was part of a nservative Christian backlash to the Supreme Court’s gay marriage lg. Mulls and Craig were planng their weddg Massachetts 2012 and wanted the ke for a receptn Colorado, where gay marriage was not yet legal. Phillips and others like him who believe that gay marriage is nsistent wh their Christian beliefs have said they should not be required to effectively endorse the practice.

RULG MA SE OF COLO. BAKER WHO REFED GAY WEDDG KE

The jtic on Thursday will nsir whether to hear an appeal by a Washgton state flower shop owner who refed to create a floral arrangement to celebrate a gay weddg, based on her Christian beliefs. The se began when a same-sex uple Colorado — Charlie Craig and Dave Mulls — filed a plat wh the state civil-rights missn after baker Jack Phillips told them that he did not sign ctom k for gay upl.

SUPREME URT SIS WH BAKER WHO REFED TO MAKE GAY WEDDG KE

Kennedy said is "unexceptnal" that Colorado law "n protect gay persons acquirg products and servic on the same terms and ndns that are offered to other members of the public, " but at the same time, "the law mt be applied a manner that is ntral toward relign. Moreover, the state law at the time afford storekeepers some latu to cle creatg specific msag they nsired offensive, and the Colorado missn had prevly allowed three different bakers to refe to put an anti-gay msage on a ke. " Throughout the opn, Kennedy seemed to be balancg the ledger, tryg not to disturb public acmodatn laws like the one Colorado and reeratg that gay people may "not be treated as outsts.

" While a member of the clergy clearly nnot be forced to nduct a weddg ceremony for a same-sex uple, vlatn of his relig views, Kennedy said, Colorado "n protect gay persons, jt as n protect other class of dividuals.

He closed by sayg that "the oute of s like this other circumstanc mt awa further elaboratn the urts, all the ntext of regnizg that the disput mt be rolved wh tolerance, whout undue disrpect to scere relig beliefs, and whout subjectg gay persons to digni when they seek goods and servic an open market.

SUPREME COURT SIS WH BAKER WHO REFED TO MAKE WEDDG KE FOR GAY UPLE

They argued that as the Colorado missn had prevly allowed bakers to refe to rate k wh anti-gay signs, the missn's cisn to le agast Phillips was herently nsistent and discrimated agast some relig groups. It gave no ht as to how the urt might ci future s volvg florists, bakers, photographers and other bs owners who have ced relig and ee-speech objectns when refg to serve gay and lbian ctomers the wake of the Supreme Court's 2015 same-sex marriage the 7-2 cisn, the urt said legal proceedgs Colorado had shown a hostily to the baker's relig views. "The disput mt be rolved wh tolerance, whout undue disrpect to scere relig beliefs, and whout subjectg gay persons to digni when they seek goods and servic an open market, " Kennedy the lg, which me durg Pri Month, gave ltle guidance to the lower urts about how to balance those petg cisn was a victory for Jack Phillips of Masterpiece Cakhop Denver, who has said that his k are works of art and that requirg him to bake them for same-sex weddgs would force him to exprs a view that vlated his relig beliefs.

Craig and Mulls filed a plat after nservative Christian baker Jack Phillips refed to make them a weddg ke for their same-sex Somovilla / Getty ImagAfter the uple filed a formal plat, Colorado urts led that the state's public acmodatn law, which bans discrimatn by pani offerg their servic to the public, did not allow Phillips to refe the gay uple's requt.

Supreme urt sis wh baker who refed to make gay weddg ke | US supreme urt | The Guardian

Recent Posts

Tags

Contents:

SUPREME COURT TOSS LG AGAST BAKERS WHO REFED KE FOR GAY UPLE

SUPREME COURT HEARS WHY BAKER REFED TO MAKE A WEDDG KE FOR GAY UPLE

BAKER WHO REFED TO MAKE KE FOR GAY WEDDG: 'I DON'T DISCRIMATE'

THE BAKER WHO REFED TO SERVE A GAY COUPLE