Sample se study paper on Gay Rights topics. Free Gay Rights se study example for stunts. Profsnal tips how to wre good se studi onle.
Contents:
- A COMPREHENSIVE CASE STUDY OF A GAY-STRAIGHT ALLIANCE: FOSTERG SAFE, SUPPORTIVE SCHOOLS FOR LBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENR STUNTS
- PREP FAILS GAY MAN ADHERG TO DAILY TVADA, HE CONTRACTS DG-RISTANT HIV
- CASE STUDY ON GAY RIGHTS
- CASE STUDY ON GAY DISCRIMATN
A COMPREHENSIVE CASE STUDY OF A GAY-STRAIGHT ALLIANCE: FOSTERG SAFE, SUPPORTIVE SCHOOLS FOR LBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENR STUNTS
To addrs this challenge and others, only through the ntued activism of the lbian, gay, bisexual, transgenr, and queer muny and s supporters n a strong voice emerge and give rise to systemic change. Gale Case Studi: Intersectnal LGBTQ Issu offers a closer look to the history of genr inty as relat to lbian, gay, bisexual, transgenr, and queer people and activism to the twenty-first century.
For example, the se study on the Wolfenn Report together wh the se study on FBI surveillance of LGBTQ anizatns reveals the role of ernment crimalizg, targetg, and harassg lbian, gay, bisexual, transgenr, and queer people both the Uned Stat and Bra the 1950s and 1960s.
PREP FAILS GAY MAN ADHERG TO DAILY TVADA, HE CONTRACTS DG-RISTANT HIV
Bisexual men are perceived to sound more mascule than men who are straight, acrdg to a study of Atralian subjects.Amics at the Universy of Sydney pared the voic of gay, straight and bisexual men a study volvg 160 people.In the rearch led by clil psychologist Jam Morandi, people were reced to analyse the voic of 60 men, 20 of whom were gay, 20 straight and 20 bisexual. They were then asked to rate the men on their sexual orientatn g a sle om zero (exclively heterosexual) to 10 (exclively homosexual).Listeners were also asked to rate each man’s perceived level of femy or masculy the voic on a siar sle.The men volved the study were asked to rerd themselv on a smartphone recg the first two l of the Atralian natnal anthem.Voice sampl were then modified to remove any background noise while volume levels were ma the same to ensure nsistency.Rults om the study showed listeners uld distguish between gay and straight men’s voic wh an accuracy of 62 per cent, apparently nsistent wh prev rearch.However, the study participants uld not terme any differenc between bisexual and straight men’s voic wh any gree of accuracy. The thors said their rearch showed bisexual men’s voic were perceived as beg more exclively attracted to women pared wh both gay and straight men’s voic.Bisexual men’s voic were rated as more mascule than both gay and straight men’s voic.Rearchers claimed the abily to intify a man’s bisexual inty om his voice alone uld have cril social implitns such as helpg to rce feelgs of alienatn.‘Voice may unter visibily many bisexuals feel’An abstract of the study, tled Can listeners tect if a man is bisexual om his voice alone, reads: “The prent study examed whether bisexual men n be intified om their voic ak to how gay men n be intified on their voice alone.“If this is the se, voice may be an important target of discrimatn on the one hand but may also unter the visibily many bisexuals feel (if their bisexual inti n be apprehend by their voice alone, whout explic disclosure required).“The fdgs may also she light on whether bisexual male voic, like gay male voic, differ om straight voic terms of their genr non-nformy – a qutn that to date has not been examed.”But amics noted the rearch was limed on the grounds all men who participated the study are Atralian, which may not be reflected among wir cultur.And the thors nced the study did not ntrol for the rerdg environment or microphone-to-mouth distance, which uld have affected the qualy of the voice sampl.The thors said the fdgs suggted that while the voic of bisexual men the sample were perceived as more mascule and attracted to femal, listeners did not associate this imprsn wh bisexualy.As a rult, while bisexual men may appear to be at lower risk of facg voice-based intifitn and discrimatn than gay men, they may often be mistaken as beg straight.The study was published the Journal of Sex Rearch.
To better unrstand provir experienc servg lbian, gay, bisexual, transgenr and Qutng (LGBTQ) naway and homels youth, this study reports on se studi of four lol agenci receivg grants om the Admistratn for Children and Fay’s Runaway and Homels Youth (RHY) Program.
This report, which summariz fdgs om four se studi of Runaway and Homels Youth Program grante servg lbian, gay, bisexual, transgenr, and qutng youth, benefed om the ntributns of many people.
CASE STUDY ON GAY RIGHTS
Some ernment and private anizatns are terted improvg servic for lbian, gay, bisexual, transgenr, and qutng (LGBTQ) youth who n away om home or experience homelsns. Rearch suggts that young people who are lbian, gay, bisexual, transgenr, or qutng their sexualy (LGBTQ) face a disproportnate risk of homelsns. Acrdg to a study of a reprentative sample of high school stunts one state, lbian, gay, and bisexual youth and heterosexual youth who have same-sex sexual partners are 4 to 13 tim more likely than exclively heterosexual youth to be homels (Corliss et al.
Several studi have found that lbian, gay, and bisexual youth are more likely than heterosexual youth to (1) have been physilly or sexually victimized, (2) engage survival sex or sex work, (3) have attempted suici, (4) e illic substanc, and (5) have greater mental health ncerns (Cochran et al. Sexual orientatn refers to “the sex of those to whom an dividual is sexually and romantilly attracted” and generally clus the tegori lbian, gay, bisexual, and heterosexual. 2 Exampl clu the Ali Forney Center and Green Chimneys New York Cy; the Ruth Ellis Center Detro, Michigan; and the Gay and Lbian Communy Center Los Angel, California.
CASE STUDY ON GAY DISCRIMATN
Acrdg to the RHY Program’s 2010-2011 Report to Congrs, among youth whose sexual orientatn was reported RHYMIS, lbian, gay, and bisexual youth acunted for 6 or 7 percent served the Basic Center Program and 9 or 10 percent served the Transnal Livg Program durg fisl years 2010 and 2011 (HHS 2013). The form do not specify qutn phrasg but do dite rponse tegori: (1) heterosexual, (2) bisexual, (3) gay, (4) lbian, (5) qutng, and (6) self-intified orientatn.
Another survey found that lbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) youth six stat were more likely than non-LGB youth to engage survival sex and substance abe (Van Luwen et al. This pattern may be lked to a general tenncy among youth to take risks, but studi also have found an associatn between strsors related specifilly to gay, lbian, or bisexual sexual orientatn (such as social isolatn or victimizatn) and high-risk sexual behavr and other problem behavrs (Rotheram-Bos et al. The study found that lbian, gay, and bisexual youth were at elevated risk for datg vlence victimizatn and perpetratn, pared to their heterosexual peers, and that transgenr youth were more likely than non-transgenr male or female youth to be victimized and to perpetrate vlence (except psychologil abe) (Dank et al.