Rpondg to the 'Gay Agenda': Three reasons why dialogue might be an appropriate rponse | Ameri Magaze

Contents:

• THE ‘GAY AGENDA,’ EXPLAED
• THE GAY AGENDA BLUEPRT: A PLAN TO TRANSFORM AMERI
• FALLY THE GREAT GAY AGENDA IS WORKG! TWICE AS MANY OF NOW INTIFY AS LGBTQ+
• WHAT'S BEHD THE GAY AGENDA?
• THE GAY AGENDA AND THE REAL WORLD
• GAY AGENDA
• NETFLIX LNCH ‘THE GAY AGENDA,’ PODST CELEBRATG LGBTQ+ COMMUNY (EXCLUSIVE)
• RPONDG TO THE 'GAY AGENDA': THREE REASONS WHY DIALOGUE MIGHT BE AN APPROPRIATE RPONSE
• THE MYTH OF THE GAY AGENDA

THE ‘GAY AGENDA,’ EXPLAED

Well-rearched surveys (as opposed to some wh markedly skewed sampl and/or methodology) have nsistently placed the homosexual populatn of Ameri at around 2 to 3 percent—yet the fluence of homosexuals on Amerin culture is vastly out of proportn wh their actual numbers. A USA Today article last year reported 32 regularly appearg bisexual or homosexual characters primetime work scripted seri for the 2014-15 televisn season, wh another 64 appearg ble TV shows (Bill Keveney, “Y, You Really Are Seeg More LGBT Characters on TV, ” Oct. They then add this utn for those who would want to ph the gay agenda too far: “It almost go whout sayg that groups on the fartht marg of acceptabily such as NAMBLA [the North Amerin Man-Boy Love Associatn, which as s name suggts promot adult-child homosexual sex] mt play no part at all such a mpaign: spected child-molters will never look like victims...

This strategy—aid and abetted by sympathetic news media and ernment agenci—has led to enterg a stage of aggrsive attacks by some the gay muny agast those who scerely believe that homosexual behavr vlat the laws, stctns and prcipl of God. Yet at the same time, they ma a statement showg that gays really aren’t the opprsed, victimized group Kirk and Madsen advote they be portrayed as: “Bee those gays not supportg fai ually have more discretnary e than average, they uld afford to ntribute much more.

“Bee most straightforward appeals are impossible, the Natnal Gay Task Force has had to cultivate quiet backroom liaisons wh broadst pani and newsrooms orr to make sure that issu important to the gay muny receive some verage.

THE GAY AGENDA BLUEPRT: A PLAN TO TRANSFORM AMERI

To unrstand the stggl of those wh SSA who are scerely tryg to rist sexual temptatns and who are tryg to "be transformed" to follow "the perfect will of God" (Romans 12:2), please see "The Human Si of Homosexualy: From One Who Has Stggled"). While not all homosexuals support the gay agenda or are actively volved tryg to refe marriage, many gay anizatns are volved, as Michael Brown pots out his 2011 book A Queer Thg Happened to Ameri: And What a Long, Strange Trip It's Been.

As he documents, "There are well-fund, highly-motivated, sharply-foced gay activist anizatns such as HRC [Human Rights Campaign] and NGLTF [Natnal Gay and Lbian Task Force] and PFLAG [Parents, Fai and Friends of Lbians and Gays] and GLSEN [Gay, Lbian and Straight Edutn Network] and GLAAD [Gay and Lbian Alliance Agast Defamatn] and Lambda Legal—jt to mentn a few" (p. The article not that "attus toward gays and lbians have changed so much jt the last 10 years that, as Gallup reported last week, 'half or more now agree that beg gay is morally acceptable, that gay relatns ought to be legal and that gay or lbian upl should have the right to legally marry.

In about a generatn we have seen society transformed om nsirg homosexualy to be a psychologil disorr to the pot that those who do not accept or affirm homosexualy are themselv lled homophobic and viewed as mentally abnormal!

FALLY THE GREAT GAY AGENDA IS WORKG! TWICE AS MANY OF NOW INTIFY AS LGBTQ+

The gay agenda, along wh the sexual revolutn that began half a century ago, has transformed Ameri's moral standard that was once based on biblil valu to one that accepts as monplace the homosexual liftyle and many other biblilly nmned behavrs. Brown provis an example of the efforts of one homosexual advocy anizatn over the past two s: "This is the day of the 'queerg of elementary tns' —to quote the tle of a highly-praised book —and much of this is due to the fluence of GLSEN, the Gay, Lbian, and Straight Edutnal Network (pp. As the LGBTQ agenda has been ont and center durg Pri Month June, the Amerin Fay Associatn (AFA, ) is alertg parents about the ncerted effort to normalize homosexualy, same-sex marriage and the transgenr liftyle to the untry's youngt cizens.

Ratburn, was gay and gettg partment stor are not only offerg clothg and accsori for both adults and children to celebrate the gay liftyle, but the pany has also pledged to donate $100, 000 to the Gay, Lbian Straight Edutn Network (GLSEN), an anizatn whose primary foc is stctg school-aged stunts about how to create "gay" clubs public schools across the natn. A gay character was seemgly shoe-horned to a scene the blockbter Marvel film Avengers: Endgame to satisfy the LGBT agenda and reach a younger Queen Story Hours have been planned at lol public and school librari natnwi over the past year.

WHAT'S BEHD THE GAY AGENDA?

The goals and means of this movement clu doctratg stunts  public school, rtrictg the ee speech of opposn, obtag special treatment for homosexuals, distortg Biblil teachg and science, and terferg wh eedom of associatn. “This nference illtrat jt how cleverly ceptive this [Revoice] movement really is, as they manipulate the dience emotnally wh heart-wrenchg ttimoni between each and every ssn by “homosexual Christians” who have “cid” to be celibate for Christ, for which they surely serve all the glory and applse!

The stated goals of the Revoice nference clu, “Supportg, enuragg, and empowerg gay, lbian, same-sex-attracted, and other LGBT Christians so they n flourish while observg the historic, Christian doctre of marriage and sexualy. But the prcipl they foist mand prehensive acceptance of homosexual nduct — by force of law — through feral edicts such as “hate crim” legislatn, the so-lled “Employment Non-Discrimatn Act” (ENDA) and by imposg ernment sanctned “same-sex marriage.

In their mancript, After the Ball: How Ameri Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays the 90’s (1989, Doubleday/Bantam), Harvard ted marketg experts Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen meticuloly laid out the homosexual lobby’s blueprt for succs what is wily regard as the handbook for the “gay” agenda. “Associate all who oppose homosexualy wh imag of ‘Klansmen mandg that gays be slghtered, ’ ‘hysteril backwoods preachers, ’ ‘menacg punks, ’ and a ‘tour of Nazi ncentratn mps where homosexuals were tortured and gassed.

THE GAY AGENDA AND THE REAL WORLD

Homosexualy ought to be tolerated, not Demg is profsor of arts and scienc at the Universy of Oklahoma, and the thor of Black & Whe: Polilly Inrrect Essays on Polics, Culture, Science, Relign, Energy and Environment (CreateSpace, 2011). “Wh our first foray to the podst space, Most is enterg a new era — one where the gay agenda ntu to expand to all rners of our dience’s liv, makg easier and more fun than ever to disver Netflix’s LGBTQ+ talent, tl, and storytellg, ” Gabrielle Korn, Netflix edorial and publishg manager for Most, said. You are not tryg to brg damnatn on the head of homosexuals, you are tryg to brg nvictn so that they n turn om that s and embrace the only hope of salvatn for all of sners—and that's through fah the Lord J Christ.

GAY AGENDA

Right after intifyg homosexuals as those who "will not her the kgdom of God, " Pl said, "Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were jtified the name of the Lord J Christ and the Spir of our God" (1 Corthians 6:11). Shepard provid a remr of the ser and cril mands for which gays and lbians agenda flts many stutns society for fosterg homophobic attus that lead to misnduct agast gaysand the Catholic Church ranks high on the list. Homosexual acts are always wrong bee the acts are ntrary to natural law and scriptural saidand nsistently rtatedmany church lears sist that the Catholic Church and s teachg supports rpect for homosexual persons and oppos discrimatn, huiatg remarks cludg jok and slurs, and the nial of legimate civil ratnale that unrgirds Catholic opposn to homosexual acts stems om the way the church unrstands the meang and purpose of sex: God created humans as male and female and signed their genal plementary for procreatn.

This fundamental premise pruppos that the fay is the basic un of society and that the well-beg of society nnot be mataed unls the nuclear fay is gay agenda, radil opposn to Catholic teachg, do not hold that sexual acts between nsentg adults are immoral or that alternative liftylcludg same-sex upl and blogil or adoptive parenthood by homosexual persons or uplare ethilly problematic. In ntrast, the homosexual act of a person wh a homosexual orientatn is nmned by church teachg whout regard for why the act is engaged , the circumstanc of the persons volved or the nsequenc for them as dividuals as well as for the broar society. Moraly is th intified wh physil or blogil procs rather than wh human cisns about how to exercise sexualy lovg and rponsible natural law moraly is first and foremost ratnal, a theoretil cricism is ma that church teachg is not on firm ground when crafts s rponse to homosexual acts a blogistic ve that fails to take to acunt the tentns, circumstanc and nsequencall of which are herent aspects of human actns.

Until more is unrstood about the gre and varieti of same-sex orientatn, mak sense to be far as empiril data om gays and lbians are ncerned, church lears need to listen orr to learn about sexual and spirual experienc of gay and lbian Catholics.

NETFLIX LNCH ‘THE GAY AGENDA,’ PODST CELEBRATG LGBTQ+ COMMUNY (EXCLUSIVE)

In light of the fact that the Catholic Church supports scientific study of Scripture, credibily for s teachgs on homosexualy mands a siar openns to Scripture scholarship to terme what moral guidance n be gleaned om Bible vers that seem at first glance to be germane to the ntemporary bate.

This is not a task for Catholic lears alone, but there is no unrtimatg the signifince of the role they play tablishg fundamental sights about who gay and lbian people are and what standards they should observe their sexual nduct. The goals and means of this movement clu doctratg stunts public school, rtrictg the ee speech of opposn, obtag special treatment for homosexuals, distortg Biblil teachg and science, and terferg wh eedom of associatn.

RPONDG TO THE 'GAY AGENDA': THREE REASONS WHY DIALOGUE MIGHT BE AN APPROPRIATE RPONSE

[7][8][9] For example, Rsia banned adoptn by Amerins as the Obama Admistratn aggrsively phed the homosexual agenda, and June 2013 a hoe the Rsian parliament passed legislatn to ban foreign adoptn by gay upl or sgle parents who live any gay marriage natn. Haton Square Baptist Church Durg the Haton Square Baptist Church rt an angry group of male homosexuals and lbians vandalized church property, asslted church members, terrorized church ngregants, screamed profany, threw rocks, harassed and sred children, and dispted a church service.

has been antly mandg not jt the homosexuals' right to do whatever they wish to do behd closed doors, but, more importantly, that society fully accept their liftyle as both healthy and normal, even mandg special rights and legislatn as an "opprsed mory. The tradnal civic virtue of tolerance (if gays want to live together, 's their own bs) has been replaced wh a new ethic requirg approval and endorsement (if gays want to live together, we mt 'acknowledge the posive aspects' of their way of life). Reisman her extensive Craftg “Gay” Children, [23] reports that Harvard homosexual Toby Morotta, PhD, stated that the 1970s, members of the Gay Activists Alliance - who were traed the “zappg" of any who rebuffed homosexualy.

She stat that the GAU has long fought for domatn of s worldview wh the amic muny, and profsnal journals monly assigned GAU and other homosexual peer reviewers to rearch touchg on homosexualy, generally rultg a quick ath to possible unfavorable fdgs.

THE MYTH OF THE GAY AGENDA

This and the general agenda is seen to be overall implementg a marketg strategy explaed a book lled After the Ball, by gay rights activists Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen the late 1980s, which a six-pot plan was set forth as to how they uld transform the beliefs of ordary Amerins wh regard to homosexual behavr a -long time ame:. Today's opn is the product of a Court, which is the product of a law-profsn culture, that has largely signed on to the so-lled homosexual agenda, by which I mean the agenda promoted by some homosexual activists directed at elimatg the moral opprobrium that has tradnally attached to homosexual nduct.