The jury found that Rob Thicke and Pharrell Williams, who share a songwrg cred on the song, had mted pyright gement, and award more than $7.3 ln to Mr. Gaye’s fay.
Contents:
- ROB THICKE, PHARRELL WILLIAMS TO PAY $5 LN TO MARV GAYE TATE FOR 'BLURRED L'
- MARV GAYE TATE VS ROB THICKE AND PHARRELL WILLIAMS
- WILLIAMS V. GAYE, NO. 15-56880 (9TH CIR. 2018)
- THE BLURRED L OF COPYRIGHT LAW: ROB THICKE V. MARV GAYE'S ESTATE
- PHARRELL WILLIAMS AND ROB THICKE TO PAY $7.4M TO MARV GAYE'S FAY OVER BLURRED L
- MARV GAYE VS. ROB THICKE: 6 CAS OF MIC PLAGIARISM LAWSUS AFTER 'BLURRED L' AND 'GOT TO GIVE IT UP' VERDICT
- MARV GAYE'S FAY WS 'BLURRED L' APPEAL; PHARRELL, ROB THICKE MT PAY
- ‘BLURRED L’ INGED ON MARV GAYE COPYRIGHT, JURY RUL
- 'BLURRED L' NTROVERSY RURFAC AS MARV GAYE'S FAY CLAIMS PHARRELL MTED PERJURY
- ‘BLURRED L’ JURY ORRS PHARRELL, ROB THICKE TO PAY $7.3 MILLN TO MARV GAYE FAY
ROB THICKE, PHARRELL WILLIAMS TO PAY $5 LN TO MARV GAYE TATE FOR 'BLURRED L'
Rob Thicke and Pharrell Williams were orred to pay $5 ln to Marv Gaye's tate, the fal verdict of the 'Blurred L' lawsu. * robin thicke and pharrell williams vs marvin gaye *
Rob Thicke, Pharrell Williams to pay $5 ln to Marv Gaye tate for 'Blurred L'The five-year legal battle has end wh a verdict favor of Mart Gaye's tate, who sued claimg "Blurred L" pied Gaye's "Got To Give It Up"Sger Pharrell Williams and sger Rob Thicke perform together Fayetteville, Arkansas, on June 6, Wilkg / Rters fileDec. 13, 2018, 8:24 PM UTCThe long drawn-out pyright battle over Rob Thicke’s 2013 song “Blurred L” has end after a judge orred Thicke and Pharrell Williams to pay almost $5 ln to Marv Gaye’s tate the se’s fal lg.
Members of Gaye’s fay sued Thicke and Williams, along wh rapper and featured artist on the song, T. I., 2013 for pyright gement of Gaye’s 1977 h song “Got to Give It Up. ”In 2015, the Gaye fay won their se.
MARV GAYE TATE VS ROB THICKE AND PHARRELL WILLIAMS
Marv Gaye fay's pyright gement lawsu agast Rob Thicke and Pharrell Williams ends $5 ln judgment. * robin thicke and pharrell williams vs marvin gaye *
The urt orred Thicke and Williams to pay Gaye’s tate more than $7 ln dollars, an amount that was later rced to $5. 6 lg, a judge the Central District of California reaffirmed the March lg, clarg Thicke, Williams, and More Water From Nazareth Publishg mt pay Gaye’s tate $2. 76 ln dollars, while Williams and his publishg pany mt each pay Gaye’s tat separate rewards of $357, 630.
Was cleared of any liabily March, a cisn upheld this last and fal Gaye tate was also reward half of the song’s nng royalti om after the urt’s origal judgment date, and tert of 0. In 2016, more than 200 micians, cludg Jennifer Hudson and Hans Zimmer, filed an amic brief support of Thicke and Williams appeal, claimg the verdict would be “very dangero” to the mic the Gaye fay first filed their lawsu, other high-profile artists like Lana Del Rey and Mark Ronson have been siarly KslenBen Kslen is a reporter for NBC News.
WILLIAMS V. GAYE, NO. 15-56880 (9TH CIR. 2018)
The nsolidated appeals stemmed om a jury's fdg that Pharrell Williams, Rob Thicke, and Clifford Harris, Jr.'s song "Blurred L," the world's btsellg sgle 2013, ged Frankie Christian Gaye, Nona Marvisa Gaye, and Marv Gaye III's pyright Marv Gaye's 1977 h song "Got To Give It Up." The Nth Circu affirmed part and reversed part the district urt's judgment. The panel held that "Got To Give It Up" was entled to broad pyright protectn bee mil posns were not nfed to a narrow range of exprsn; the panel accepted, whout cidg, the mers of the district urt's lg that the spe of fendants' pyright was limed, unr the Copyright Act of 1909, to the sheet mic posed wh the Copyright Office, and did not extend to sound rerdgs; the district urt's orr nyg summary judgment was not reviewable after a full trial on the mers; the district urt did not err nyg a new trial; the district urt did not abe s discretn admtg portns of expert ttimony; the verdict was not agast the clear weight of the evince; the awards of actual damag and profs and the district urt's nng royalty were proper; the district urt erred overturng the jury's general verdict favor of Harris and the Interspe Parti; the district urt did not abe s discretn nyg the Gay' motn for attorney's fe; and the district urt did not abe s discretn apportng sts among the parti. * robin thicke and pharrell williams vs marvin gaye *
Legal saga wh Marv Gaye's fay nclus wh fal judgment. Marv Gaye fay's pyright gement lawsu agast Rob Thicke and Pharrell Williams ends $5 ln judgment. A judge has entered a nearly $5 ln judgment agast Rob Thicke and Pharrell Williams favor of Marv Gaye’s fay the long-nng lawsu volvg pyright gement surroundg Thicke and Williams’ song “Blurred L” and Gaye’s 1977 h “Got to Give It Up, ” Billboard reports.
THE BLURRED L OF COPYRIGHT LAW: ROB THICKE V. MARV GAYE'S ESTATE
The nsolidated appeals stemmed om a jury's fdg that Pharrell Williams, Rob Thicke, and Clifford Harris, Jr.'s song "Blurred L," the world's btsellg sgle 2013, ged Frankie Christian Gaye, Nona Marvisa Gaye, and ... * robin thicke and pharrell williams vs marvin gaye *
Are jotly required to pay Gaye’s fay. 97 to the Gaye fay.
PHARRELL WILLIAMS AND ROB THICKE TO PAY $7.4M TO MARV GAYE'S FAY OVER BLURRED L
The posers of the h song “Blurred L”, Rob Thicke, Pharrell Williams and Clifford Harris, Jr. (a/k/a T.I.), have menced a lawsu agast Marv Gaye’s fay, as owners of Gaye’s “Got to Give It Up”, and Bridgeport Mic, as owner of Funkalic’s “Sexy Ways”. The plat is for claratory relief, [...] * robin thicke and pharrell williams vs marvin gaye *
Addnally, The Gaye fay is entled to receive prejudgment tert on the damag award and rpective profs agast each of them, which totals to $9097. The Gaye fay is also entled to royalti gog forward for 50 percent of the songwrer and publishg revenue g om “Blurred L.
Marv Gaye wrote and rerd Got To Give It Up December 1976 and released as a sgle March 1977.
MARV GAYE VS. ROB THICKE: 6 CAS OF MIC PLAGIARISM LAWSUS AFTER 'BLURRED L' AND 'GOT TO GIVE IT UP' VERDICT
Jury cis Pharrell Williams and Rob Thicke pied 1977 h Got to Give It Up lawsu filed by Gaye’s children * robin thicke and pharrell williams vs marvin gaye *
Release of the album Blurred L" reprentativ of Marv Gaye's tate and Funkalic's publisher Bridgeport Mic separately ntacted Williams and Thicke allegg that Blurred L ged the pyrights the posns Sexy Ways and Got To Give It Up, and that if they do not "pay a moary settlement of the... The wrers of Blurred L, Pharrell Williams, Rob Thicke and Calv Harris, reacted by "reluctantly" filg a plat for claratory relief on 15 Augt 2013 agast the three children of Marv Gaye, and Bridgeport Mic, the publishers of Funkalic's song Sexy Ways, which had been released 1974. The Gaye fay filed unterclaims October and November 2013 formally allegg that Blurred L ged the pyright Got To Give It Up.
MARV GAYE'S FAY WS 'BLURRED L' APPEAL; PHARRELL, ROB THICKE MT PAY
Wh Rob Thicke and Pharrell Williams forced to pay $7.3 ln to Marv Gaye's children, the public is learng this is a surprisgly mon thg. * robin thicke and pharrell williams vs marvin gaye *
They further alleged that Rob Thicke's song Love After War ged the pyright of Marv Gaye's After The Dance. Before the trial began the district urt led that the Gaye tate uld prent sound rerdgs that had been eded to pture only elements reflected the sheet mic 'pos py', and as a nsequence of this the mercial sound rerdg of Got To Give It Up was not played at the trial. 3m after a relculatn of the profs ma om publishg and label revenu of Blurred L, but wh an orr to pay 50% of future royalti om Blurred L to the Gaye fay, stead of placg an junctn on distributn of Blurred L, as had been requted by the Gaye fay.
On 24 Augt 2016 the Blurred L thors lodged an appeal brief wh the 9th Circu Court of Appeals LA, on the grounds that the jury had been wrongly stcted to nsir unprotectable elements of the mic, that there had been improper admissn of expert ttimony (particularly that the Gaye milogists' ttimony referred to elements not prent the sheet mic), and lack of evince supportg the verdict, matag that there is no extrsic or trsic siary between the two songs. It stat that "the majory [verdict at appeal] allows the Gay to acplish what no one has before: pyright a mil style", ntug that "strik a vastatg blow to future micians and posers everywhere. 98m to be paid to the Gaye tate, along wh tert on the owed amount, and half of the future royalti om Blurred L.
‘BLURRED L’ INGED ON MARV GAYE COPYRIGHT, JURY RUL
* robin thicke and pharrell williams vs marvin gaye *
"I told him that one of my favore songs of all time was Marv Gaye’s Got to Give It Up. The document requtg a jury trial on behalf of the Gaye fay claims that Blurred L pi "quantatively and qualatively distct, important, and regnizable portns of Got To Give It Up", which "greatly enhanc the mil and fancial value of Blurred L".
The Gaye fay's milogist Judh Fell suggted that there was a "nstellatn" of "at least eight" siari between the two songs:. They further argued that the siari argued by the Gaye fay's milogist "do not reflect material that is origal to [Got To] Give [It Up]" - suggtg that all of the mil elements qutn are mon mic and unprotectable.
'BLURRED L' NTROVERSY RURFAC AS MARV GAYE'S FAY CLAIMS PHARRELL MTED PERJURY
A feral jury found Tuday that the 2013 h song "Blurred L" ged on the Marv Gaye chart-topper "Got to Give It Up," awardg nearly $7.4 ln to Gaye's children. * robin thicke and pharrell williams vs marvin gaye *
IP Watchdog 8th January 2018 article by Profsor Sean O'Connor, argug that the gement cisn was rrect, and cludg an image of the origal Marv Gaye sheet mic pos at the US Copyright Office. Gaye fay's unterclaim and mand for a jury trial, October 2013. Addn of Marv Gaye III November 2013 to the unterclaim and mand filed October 2013.
Williams and Thicke's rponse to ial October unterclaims om Gaye tate, December 2013. Williams and Thicke's rponse to November addnal unterclaims om Marv Gaye III, December 2013.
‘BLURRED L’ JURY ORRS PHARRELL, ROB THICKE TO PAY $7.3 MILLN TO MARV GAYE FAY
Gaye. ’s song “Blurred L, ” the world’s btsellg sgle 2013, ged Frankie Christian Gaye, Nona Marvisa Gaye, and Marv Gaye III’s pyright Marv Gaye’s 1977 h song “Got To Give It Up. The panel held that “Got To Give It Up” was entled to broad pyright protectn bee mil posns were not nfed to a narrow range of exprsn; the panel accepted, whout cidg, the mers of the district urt’s lg that the spe of fendants’ pyright was limed, unr the Copyright Act of 1909, to the sheet mic posed wh the Copyright Office, and did not extend to sound rerdgs; the district urt’s orr nyg summary judgment was not reviewable after a full trial on the mers; the district urt did not err nyg a new trial; the district urt did not abe s discretn admtg portns of expert ttimony; the verdict was not agast the clear weight of the evince; the awards of actual damag and profs and the district urt’s nng royalty were proper; the district urt erred overturng the jury’s general verdict favor of Harris and the Interspe Parti; the district urt did not abe s discretn nyg the Gay’ motn for attorney’s fe; and the district urt did not abe s discretn apportng sts among the parti.