Democratic printial ndidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has a history of repeatedly sharg unfound nspiraci that man-ma chemils the environment uld be makg children gay or transgenr and g the femizatn of boys and masculizatn of girls.
Contents:
- GAY PARENTS RAISG KIDS: HOW WILL THEY FARE?
- KIDS OF GAY PARENTS FARE WORSE, STUDY FDS, BUT REARCH DRAWS FIRE OM EXPERTS
- THE CHILDREN OF GAY PARENTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELV
- LBIAN AND GAY PARENTG
GAY PARENTS RAISG KIDS: HOW WILL THEY FARE?
The days, gay parents are no novelty. * children raised in gay families *
The days, gay parents are no novelty: We see them strollg through our neighborhoods, participatg our PTA meetgs, and, perhaps most notably, appearg on our TV screens: Mchell and Cam, fathers to Lily, on the ratgs smash Morn Fay; Glee’s Sue Sylvter, expectant mom to a baby nceived wh an as-yet-unrevealed sperm donor, and Rachel’s dads, played wh humor and grace by Jeff Goldblum and Brian Stok. Though this media mastreamifitn of gay parentg is a relatively new phenomenon, for s, gay parents have had children all sorts of fay nfiguratns—whether through adoptn, prev heterosexual relatnships, or, creasgly, by choosg to have blogil offsprg g vro, surrogate, and other methods.
KIDS OF GAY PARENTS FARE WORSE, STUDY FDS, BUT REARCH DRAWS FIRE OM EXPERTS
Jot statement om advocy groups lls study a "flawed, misleadg, and scientifilly unsound paper that seeks to disparage lbian and gay parents;" thor fends his study * children raised in gay families *
In a jot statement om the Fay Equaly Council, the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Freedom to Marry, and the Gay and Lbian Alliance agast Defamatn (GLAAD), advot lled the study a "flawed, misleadg, and scientifilly unsound paper that seeks to disparage lbian and gay parents. Dpe numero attempts to bias the rults favour of the null hypothis and allowg for up to 20 (of 63, 32%) dg errors, Cameron's (2006) hypothis that gay and lbian parents would be more likely to have gay, lbian, bisexual or unsure (of sexual orientatn) sons and dghters was nfirmed. The Amerin Psychologil Associatn (APA) reported on gay parentg, wh Loren Marks, associate profsor at the School of Human Elogy at Louisiana State Universy, statg that “Not a sgle study has found children of lbian or gay parents to be disadvantaged any signifint rpect relative to children of heterosexual parents” (Marks 2012).
THE CHILDREN OF GAY PARENTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELV
Ten narrative studi volvg fay histori of 262 children of gay fathers and lbian mothers were evaluated statistilly rponse to Morrison's (2007) ncerns about Cameron's (2006) rearch that had volved three narrative studi. Dpe numero attempts to bias the rults favou … * children raised in gay families *
This study uld jt be a rult of chance, as the numbers of children wh homosexual parents were low, or other factors uld go to the negative rults of the 40 unknown “tegori” such as the stcture of the way the tegori are word or set up, which uld be due to Regnes’s own personal bias. Children whose parents are gay and lbian have historilly been subjected to laws, social polici, and disapprovg attus that create social distance and ostracism and challenge the stabily of their fai as well as their optimal social and psychologil velopment. This technil report provis the scientific ratnale, based on the current available evince, to support the remendatns outled the policy statement “Promotg the Well-Beg of Children Whose Parents are Gay or Lbian”1: support for marriage equaly, cludg repeal of the feral Defense of Marriage Act and siar public polici that lim accs to feral benefs associated wh civil marriage for gay and lbian upl, and the right of gay and lbian adults to adopt and provi foster re for eligible children.
LBIAN AND GAY PARENTG
Inclus a summary of rearch fdgs on lbian mothers, gay fathers and their children, an annotated biblgraphy of the published psychologil lerature and addnal rourc relevant to lbian and gay parentg. * children raised in gay families *
A few stat, eher by statute, regulatn, or legal terpretatn, rtrict or prohib foster parentg by same-genr upl and/or lbians and gay regardg jot adoptn by same genr upl, where both dividuals bee the legal parents of a blogilly unrelated child, vary om state to state. 13 Jot adoptn by lbian and gay upl is exprsly prohibed a few stat, granted by law fewer than half, and not addrsed by statut most stat that regnize civil marriage or other forms of domtic relatnships n a lbian or gay spoe or partner be regnized as a legal parent or step-parent to the child(ren) she or he is helpg raise.
Such laws are important to children when adult uple relatnships are dissolutn and appropriate ctody is unr arrangements wh a surrogate rrier are available only a few stat to gay men who wish to have a blogilly related the event of ath of a spoe, partner, or parent, state laws do not provi for Social Secury or veteran’s survivor benefs for the survivg spoe/partner and children. The reactn a fay may enunter rang om acceptance to disda: sometim pediatricians and others enuntered health re settgs or stutns may exprs stigmatizg attus or refe to regnize an unmarried parent, pecially when that parent is part of a gay or lbian uple. Many studi have asssed the velopmental and psychosocial out of children whose parents are gay or lbian and note that a fay’s social and enomic rourc and the strength of the relatnships among members of the fay are far more important variabl than parental genr or sexual orientatn affectg children’s velopment and well-beg.
The first review of available data regardg the well-beg of children livg wh lbian or gay parents nclud that “While rearch on the topics is relatively new… is no evince that the velopment of children wh lbian and gay parents is promised any signifint rpect relative to that among children of heterosexual parents otherwise parable circumstanc. A more recent prehensive review of the experienc of gay and lbian parents and their children reaffirmed that most children raised by lbian and gay parents are velopmentally and socially well-adjted and that the societal prence of stigma, heterosexism, fay circumstance, stcture, and procs are more important fluenc on children’s velopmental trajectory than is the genr or sexual orientatn of their parents.