Gay marriage, also known as same-sex marriage, has been legal the US sce 2015. Learn what both parti thk about the pros and ns of this issue.
Contents:
- GAY MARRIAGE, RELIGN AND THE COURT
- GAY MARRIAGE: PROS, CONS, AND WHERE BOTH PARTI STAND
- GAY MARRIAGE: DEBATG THE ETHICS, RELIGN, AND CULTURE ANALYTIL ANALYTIL ESSAY
GAY MARRIAGE, RELIGN AND THE COURT
The ntroversy igned by the Massachetts High Court lg allowg gay and lbian upl to marry ntu to rage state urts and legislatur as well as church across the natn. * gay marriage religion debate *
Letters|Gay Marriage, Relign and the Court ADVERTISEMENTlettersRears take issue wh an opn wrten by Jtice Clarence Thomas and joed by Jtice Samuel Drago for The New York TimTo the Edor:Re “Thomas and Alo Raise Doubts on Same-Sex Marriage Rulg” (news article, Oct. 6):Whout a ht of irony, Jtice Clarence Thomas, addrsg gay marriage an opn joed by Jtice Samuel Alo, wrote that “those wh scerely held relig beliefs ncerng marriage will fd creasgly difficult to participate society.
People this untry every area of life om marriage equaly to adoptn to health re ncern that those who oppose gay marriage will be perceived as bigots whout acknowledgment of the history of adly bias agast those the L.
GAY MARRIAGE: PROS, CONS, AND WHERE BOTH PARTI STAND
Public Opn on Same-Sex Marriage Slishow: Changg Attus on Gay Marriage Overview of Same-Sex Marriage the U.S. Gay Marriage and the Law * gay marriage religion debate *
Please don’t abandon the rt of GordonSan FrancisA versn of this article appears prt on, Sectn A, Page 24 of the New York edn wh the headle: Gay Marriage, Relign and the Supreme Court. The Natnal Relig Learship Roundtable, which supported the multi-fah event on the steps of the San Francis Cy Hall scribed above, is nvened by the Natnal Gay and Lbian Task Force. Equal Employment Opportuny Commissn, se the movement for same-sex marriage an opportuny “to make the se for” the “normative moral equivalence” of “gay and heterosexual sex”—an argument, Profsor Feldblum observ, “that is hardly ever heard polil circl.
Rutgers Law Profsor Carlos Ball believ that the stggle for “societal acceptance” of same-sex relatnships entails a “ontal attack” on the “eply held views of many Amerins regardg the (im)moraly of homosexualy.
[30] The thors, who clu Profsors Feldblum and Ball, believe that “current advot for gay rights are not really engagg their opponents unls they are engaged wh the moral nature of their opponents’ views and arguments. Supporters of same-sex marriage ntend that gay and lbian upl should be treated no differently than their heterosexual unterparts and that they should be able to marry like anyone else.
GAY MARRIAGE: DEBATG THE ETHICS, RELIGN, AND CULTURE ANALYTIL ANALYTIL ESSAY
* gay marriage religion debate *
They pot out, for stance, that homosexual upl who have been together for years often fd themselv whout the basic rights and privileg that are currently enjoyed by heterosexual upl who legally marry — om the sharg of health and pensn benefs to hospal visatn rights.