Gay Marriage: Pros, Cons, and Where Both Parti Stand - The Flag

Contents:

• SHOULD GAY MARRIAGE BE LEGAL?
• PRO & CON QUOT: SHOULD GAY MARRIAGE BE LEGAL?
• 33 MAJOR PROS & CONS OF GAY MARRIAGE“GAY MARRIAGE ACCEPTANCE IS HAPPENG THE BLK OF AN EYE.”P. J. O’ROURKE, COMEDIANADVANTAG & DISADVANTAG OF GAY MARRIAGE
• GAY MARRIAGE: PROS, CONS, AND WHERE BOTH PARTI STAND

SHOULD GAY MARRIAGE BE LEGAL?

On July 25, 2014 Miami-Da County Circu Court Judge Sarah Zabel led Florida’s gay marriage ban unnstutnal and stated that the ban “serv only to hurt, to discrimate, to prive same-sex upl and their fai of equal digny, to label and treat them as send-class cizens, and to em them unworthy of participatn one of the fundamental stutns of our society. The Amerin Psychologil Associatn, Amerin Psychiatric Associatn, and others nclud that legal gay marriage giv upl “accs to the social support that already facilat and strengthens heterosexual marriag, wh all of the psychologil and physil health benefs associated wh that support.

PRO & CON QUOT: SHOULD GAY MARRIAGE BE LEGAL?

2016 printial ndidate and former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fra stated that civil unns are aquate as an equivalent to marriage: “Benefs are beg btowed to gay upl [ civil unns]… I believe we need to rpect those who believe that the word marriage has a spirual foundatn… Why n’t we rpect and tolerate that while at the same time sayg ernment nnot btow benefs unequally. Court papers filed July 2014 by attorneys fendg Arizona’s gay marriage ban stated that “the State regulat marriage for the primary purpose of channelg potentially procreative sexual relatnships to endurg unns for the sake of jog children to both their mother and their father… Same-sex upl n never provi a child wh both her blogil mother and her blogil father. Lee Badgett, PhD, Director of the Center for Public Policy and Admistratn at the Universy of Massachetts at Amherst, stated that for many gay activists “marriage means adoptg heterosexual forms of fay and givg up distctively gay fay forms and perhaps even gay and lbian culture.

Pla Ettelbrick, JD, Profsor of Law and Women’s Studi, wrote 1989, “Marriage ns ntrary to two of the primary goals of the lbian and gay movement: the affirmatn of gay inty and culture and the validatn of many forms of relatnships. Queer activist Anrs Zanichkowsky stated June 2013 that the then mpaign for gay marriage “tentnally and malicly eras and exclus so many queer people and cultur, particularly trans and genr non-nformg people, poor queer people, and queer people non-tradnal fai… marriage thks non-married people are viant and not tly servg of civil rights. In Islamic tradn, several hadhs (passag attributed to the Prophet Muhammad) nmn gay and lbian relatnships, cludg the saygs “When a man mounts another man, the throne of God shak, ” and “Sihaq [lbian sex] of women is za [illegimate sexual terurse].

Matt Barber, Associate Dean for Onle Programs at Liberty Universy School of Law, stated, “Every dividual engaged the homosexual liftyle, who has adopted a homosexual inty, they know, tuively, that what they’re dog is immoral, unnatural, and self-stctive, yet they thirst for that affirmatn.

33 MAJOR PROS & CONS OF GAY MARRIAGE“GAY MARRIAGE ACCEPTANCE IS HAPPENG THE BLK OF AN EYE.”P. J. O’ROURKE, COMEDIANADVANTAG & DISADVANTAG OF GAY MARRIAGE

A 2003 set of guil signed by Pope John Pl II stated: “There are absolutely no grounds for nsirg homosexual unns to be any way siar or even remotely analogo to God’s plan for marriage and fay… Marriage is holy, while homosexual acts go agast the natural moral law. …[W]hen I meet gay and lbian upl, when I meet same-sex upl, and I see how rg they are, how much love they have their hearts, how they’re takg re of their kids, when I hear om them the pa they feel that somehow they are still nsired ls than full cizens when to their legal rights, then, for me, I thk jt has tipped the sl that directn.

Here are a few of the advantag of same-sex marriage for the society as a whole that I have laborly spelled out: lower rat of promiscuy among gay men, more stable hom for the children of gay parents, ls trma fai wh gay offsprg, lower rat of disease transmissn, more pennt and self-reliant members of society, etc., etc. And this pattern will undoubtedly ntue, as lns of dollars will be spent fightg an anti-gay marriage nstutnal amendment proposed for the November ballot, at a time when social servic are beg scrapped across the untry, and pecially California.

While many straight people are reapg the benefs of gay liberatn and disverg new ways of lovg, ltg for and rg for one another, the gay marriage movement is by fightg for a 1950s mol of whe-picket fence ‘we’re jt like you’ normalcy.

GAY MARRIAGE: PROS, CONS, AND WHERE BOTH PARTI STAND

Joseph Ratzger, DTh, Pope Benedict XVI and Cardal Prefect of the Sacred Congregatn for the Doctre of the Fah at the time of the quote, wrote the July, 3, 2003 report approved by Pope John Pl II “Consiratns Regardg Proposals to Give Legal Regnn to Unns Between Homosexual Persons, ” available at. Refg marriage to clu same-sex upl would affect s cultural meang and functn and, dog so, damage s abily and, thereby, society’s pacy, to protect the herently procreative relatnship and the children who rult om , whether those children’s’ future sexual orientatn prov to be homosexual or heterosexual. Equal rights for everyoneProhibn of gay marriage as outdated historil nstctEqual benefs for all uplGay marriag are part of a morn and tolerant societyCultural valu changed a lot over timePosive health effects for gay uplLower strs levels for self-sex uplDifference between relig and legal marriage should be maCan also be jtified om a legal and nstutnal perspectiveMay be nsired as a human rightCan help that more orphans get adoptedStigmatizatn of adopted children om gay upl n be avoidPeople n live their life to s fulltProhibn of gay marriag would discrimate peoplePeople do no longer have to hi their te natureMany celebri embrace the ia of gay marriageIncreasg number of people nsir gay marriag as normalOne important argument for gay marriag is that everyone our society should have equal rights to do whatever they want to do as long as they do not harm others.