A supposed requt for a webse for a same-sex weddg played a mor role a major clash between ee speech and gay rights at the Supreme Court.
Contents:
- HOW SAFE IS GAY MARRIAGE? ADVOT FEAR CREASGLY NSERVATIVE URT
- SHOULD GAY MARRIAGE BE LEGAL?
- TEXAS JUDGE WHO DON’T WANT TO PERFORM GAY MARRIAGE CEREMONI HOP WEB SIGNER’S SUPREME COURT SE HELPS HER FIGHT
- WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT A SEEMGLY FAKE DOCUMENT A GAY RIGHTS CASE
HOW SAFE IS GAY MARRIAGE? ADVOT FEAR CREASGLY NSERVATIVE URT
The nomatn of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court and h cricism of the 2015 gay marriage lg by two jtic has renewed advot’ ncerns. * opposing articles on gay marriage *
Nearly eight ten Amerins (79%) favor laws that would protect gay, lbian, bisexual, and transgenr people agast discrimatn jobs, public acmodatns, and hog, cludg 41% who strongly support them. ”John Arthur, an ALS patient, and Jim Obergefell, partners for more than 20 years, are married on a medil plane Maryland Hartong / Ccnati Enquirer via AP fileAdvocy groups were quick to h back at the two nservative jtic, wh the Human Rights Campaign, the untry’s largt gay rights group, sayg a statement that Thomas and Alo had “renewed their war on LGBTQ rights and marriage equaly, as the urt hangs the balance.
”“She says she will not impose her personal beliefs on the law, and she will le for the law as is wrten, and I believe her bee she has a track rerd of dog that, as do many of the nservative jtic, ” he safe is gay marriage? When Gallup first polled Amerins on the topic of gay marriage, 1996, only 27 percent said they were favor of also noted there was an crease support for workplace protectns for LGBTQ people, which the urt recently led favor of June’s Bostock cisn, termg that Tle VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects agast workplace discrimatn based on sexual orientatn and genr were surprised when Gorsuch, a Tmp appotee, voted favor of those protectns, and fact wrote the argued that many “misread Gorsuch, ” whom he lled “not your tradnal social nservative” but rather a “libertarian nservative, ” hence his cisn on that se g through a “pla readg of a statute rather than a large nstutnal exercise. The nservative legal group, which has a long track rerd of opposg gay and transgenr rights, has been emed an anti-LGBTQ “hate group” by the Southern Policy Law Center, though the anizatn ntts that characterizatn.
SHOULD GAY MARRIAGE BE LEGAL?
Proponents ntend that gay marriage bans are discrimatory and unnstutnal, opponents ague that marriage is primarily for procreatn. * opposing articles on gay marriage *
Transgenr rights are ls well tablished by legal precent, which means they are likely to be at a bigger risk of failg to advance than gay rights, Gould argued. Dpe an improvg legal landspe for sexual mori, negative attus toward gay men and lbian women persist North Ameri, and same-sex marriage remas a topic of nsirable bate (Waters, Jdasurat, & Wolfe, 2016). Pope Benedict XVI nsired same-sex marriage to be among “the most sid and dangero threats to the mon good today” (Wfield, 2010) and homosexualy an “herent moral evil” (Popham, 2005).
Although the current Pope, Francis, holds a somewhat more welg attu toward sexual mori, he has done ltle to undo the Catholic Church’s official nmnatn of same-sex marriage (Wofford, 2014) as some relig groups played a key role the civil rights movement, there are nomatns that now support full legal and relig marriage equaly for gay and lbian upl. Furthermore, those who opposed legalizatn of same-sex marriage were pecially likely to jtify their posn on the basis of relig belief or terpretatns of the Bible (Newport, 2012) feral legalizatn of same-sex marriage beme creasgly probable the Uned Stat, the bate on lbian, gay, bisexual, and transgenr (LGBT) rights shifted om a foc on discrimatn by the ernment to discrimatn by the private sector (Johnson, 2015), wh relig arguments domatg the rhetoric of those opposg same-sex marriage.
An ial aim of this rearch program was to vtigate whether a general aversn to gay men and lbian women helps expla the relatnship between religsy and opposn to same-sex marriage. Blenner (2015) monstrated that experimentally heighteng preferenc to mata the stat quo (through a system jtifitn manipulatn) worsened participants’ views of lbians and gay men.
TEXAS JUDGE WHO DON’T WANT TO PERFORM GAY MARRIAGE CEREMONI HOP WEB SIGNER’S SUPREME COURT SE HELPS HER FIGHT
McLennan County Jtice of the Peace Dianne Hensley filed a lawsu after a state agency warned her about refg to marry gay upl. She hop a recent U.S. Supreme Court se about relig eedom helps her e. * opposing articles on gay marriage *
2Materials For more rmatn ncerng the materials and procr for all studi clud this article, nsult our project page on the Open Science Framework: Participants were asked to dite their religsy on a sle rangg om 1 (not at all relig) to 7 (extremely relig) prejudice Participants’ explic attus were measured g ems om the Attus Toward Gay Men subsle (ATGM; Herek, 1994). Sample ems clud “Homosexual behavr between two men is jt pla wrong” and “Jt as other speci, male homosexualy is a natural exprsn of sexualy human men” (reverse d; α=. Opposn to same-sex marriage Participants’ attus toward same-sex marriage were measured terms of support for the feral policy issue “gay marriage” (1 = very negative, 7 = very posive; reverse sred), which was embedd wh a list of 10 ntroversial polici orr to disguise the tent of the measure.
We also admistered a more general measure of sexual prejudice (rather than aversn to gay men particular) and examed self-reported willgns to prott agast same-sex marriage. Sample ems, which were word more broadly than the origal sle, clud the followg: “Homosexual behavr between two people is jt pla wrong” and “Jt as other speci, homosexualy is a natural exprsn of sexualy humans” (reverse sred).
WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT A SEEMGLY FAKE DOCUMENT A GAY RIGHTS CASE
* opposing articles on gay marriage *
Three were opposg actns: “Donate to an anizatn that oppos givg homosexuals more rights, ” “Sign a petn agast gay marriage, ” and “Send a letter to the ernment opposg gay marriage.
In most public discsns, the issue of same-sex marriage is posed as a simple qutn – for or agast? – where to be for or agast is to be, more or ls, for or agast gay people. Although don’t… * opposing articles on gay marriage *
” (1 = not at all relig, 7 = extremely relig) prejudice We admistered the Attus Toward Lbians and Gays (ATLG; Herek, 1998) sle, a generalized measure of sexual prejudice that clus 20 ems (1 = strongly disagree, 9 = strongly agree). Sample ems are “Female homosexualy is an ferr form of sexualy, ” “Female homosexualy self is no problem, but what society mak of n be a problem” (reverse d), “Lbians are sick, ” and “Male homosexualy is a perversn” (α=. General DiscsnIn light of current bat regardg the expansn of gay rights several untri, cludg the Uned Stat, France, Ireland, Rsia, and Atralia, this rearch prents a timely vtigatn to the motivatnal unrpngs of relig opposn to same-sex five studi nducted two untri, we obtaed support for a theoretil mol which relig opposn to same-sex marriage is lked to sexual prejudice and nservative preferenc to mata the stat quo.
Attus toward same-sex marriage, and gay rights general, may pose a psychologil nflict for those who are trsilly relig: Should they follow relig teachgs or love and accept all human begs? Given the observed role of ristance to change explag opposn to same-sex marriage, legalizg same-sex marriage may brg about creased public support for gay rights over time. Our work—and the theoretil amework that spired our rearch—suggts that terventns aimed at rcg antigay prejudice would do well to foc on (a) creasg people’s fort wh viatns om heteronormative romantic arrangements, (b) emphasizg the egalarian aspect of relign, and (c) unrcuttg arguments that morn nceptns of marriage have been variant throughout human this article, we have foced on same-sex marriage, which is but one issue the stggle for sexual equaly.