Nietzsche's The Gay Science

Contents:

• NIETZSCHE'S THE GAY SCIENCE
• THE GAY SCIENCE
• IS THERE A GAY BASIS TO NIETZSCHE'S IAS?
• NIETZSCHE: THE GAY SCIENCE WH A PRELU GERMAN RHYM AND AN APPENDIX OF SONGS
• NIETZSCHE'S 'THE GAY SCIENCE': AN TRODUCTN
• THE GAY SCIENCENONFICTN | BOOK | ADULT | PUBLISHED 1882A MORN ALTERNATIVE TO SPARKNOT AND CLIFFSNOT, SUPERSUMMARY OFFERS HIGH-QUALY STUDY GUIS THAT FEATURE TAILED CHAPTER SUMMARI AND ANALYSIS OF MAJOR THEM, CHARACTERS, QUOT, AND SAY TOPICS.DOWNLOAD PDFACCS FULL GUISTUDY GUISUMMARYCHAPTER SUMMARI & ANALYSJT, RE AND REVENGE: A PRELU IN RHYME-BOOK SENDBOOK THIRD-BOOK FIFTH: WE FEARLS ONKEY FIGURTHEMSYMBOLS & MOTIFSIMPORTANT QUOTESSAY TOPICSSUMMARY AND STUDY GUI

NIETZSCHE'S THE GAY SCIENCE

Wrg an amb bgraphy that emphasiz Nietzsche’s sexualy, Köhler tends to show that Nietzsche was gay, and that this sight leads to a reterpretatn of his work. Yet curly, he do not addrs Nietzsche’s exclamatn, Ecce Homo, that his wrgs are one thg, and he himself is another (sectn 1 of Why I Wre Such Good Books). So was Nietzsche gay?

Köhler shows that the hypothis that Nietzsche was gay illumat many episos his life, and that some ntemporari thought that he was gay. While is prumably not te of the European 19th century what Peter Brown says ( his The Body and Society) of late antiquy, namely, that is a world irretrievably closed to , we mt keep md that some regards Nietzsche’s was a different world ed: the experience of diversy was limed; sexualy was not openly discsed, while homosexualy was often punishable by rceratn. So should be unsurprisg that no direct evince of Nietzsche’s homosexualy emerg.

Still, some skepticism remas: there is no specific person wh whom Köhler claims unambiguoly that Nietzsche had a homosexual relatnship, or wh whom he longed to have one. No reference to a gay lover appears Nietzsche’s wrgs, not even a note book, although Nietzsche, for most of his sane life, had ltle reason to spect that, one day, scholars would eagerly publish even material he had disrd. Inappropriate as this prumably was, is no ditn of homosexualy, given that the petg hypothis is that Nietzsche was a sensive if perhaps socially somewhat maladjted (but at any rate straight) man tryg to nnect to like-md souls wherever he uld reach them, and was often rebed that procs.

THE GAY SCIENCE

Do Köhler mean to suggt that Rée and Nietzsche were gay lovers, at least briefly?

IS THERE A GAY BASIS TO NIETZSCHE'S IAS?

This is as close as Köhler to actually nnectg Nietzsche’s alleged homosexualy to a particular person. Very illumatg is Köhler’s suggtn that Nietzsche went to Italy bee offered refuge to German homosexuals exiled om their own untry. Long before Thomas Mann’s Aschenbach enuntered the boy Tadz, German homosexuals ventured south to fd their own Tadzs.

NIETZSCHE: THE GAY SCIENCE WH A PRELU GERMAN RHYM AND AN APPENDIX OF SONGS

We know nothg about what Nietzsche did Sicily, but Köhler argu that he uld not possibly have gone for any other reason than to seek homosexual enunters.

NIETZSCHE'S 'THE GAY SCIENCE': AN TRODUCTN

) Köhler wr as if that trip had been the culmatn of Nietzsche’s homosexual life, whatever else that life amounted to. Still, while there are lgerg qutns and no nclive evince, Köhler’s se is strong: he mak a very real possibily that Nietzsche was gay. Yet grantg that much, or more, for the sake of the argument, why should we re whether Nietzsche was gay if we are terted his philosophy?

THE GAY SCIENCENONFICTN | BOOK | ADULT | PUBLISHED 1882A MORN ALTERNATIVE TO SPARKNOT AND CLIFFSNOT, SUPERSUMMARY OFFERS HIGH-QUALY STUDY GUIS THAT FEATURE TAILED CHAPTER SUMMARI AND ANALYSIS OF MAJOR THEM, CHARACTERS, QUOT, AND SAY TOPICS.DOWNLOAD PDFACCS FULL GUISTUDY GUISUMMARYCHAPTER SUMMARI & ANALYSJT, RE AND REVENGE: A PRELU IN RHYME-BOOK SENDBOOK THIRD-BOOK FIFTH: WE FEARLS ONKEY FIGURTHEMSYMBOLS & MOTIFSIMPORTANT QUOTESSAY TOPICSSUMMARY AND STUDY GUI

This, then, is Zarathtra’s secret: Zarathtra, Nietzsche’s “son, ” talks cryptic terms about Nietzsche’s life self, his experienc as a fatherls son, and his subsequent experienc as a homosexual nmned to hidg his clatns.

Yet addn to the ncern articulated the last paragraph, we are now also wonrg what the nnectn is between Nietzsche’s alleged homosexualy, which seems to be part of what Zarathtra reveals, properly unrstood, and the eternal recurrence, or the superman (whom Köhler brgs a b too much nnectn wh Nietzsche’s Sicilian enunters, sayg that Nietzsche “saw” the superman Sicily (p 255)). Köhler sists that Nietzsche’s philosophy mt be rethought once we e to terms wh his homosexualy, but fails to expla why Nietzsche’s homosexualy even rms his ia of eternal recurrence. Jt how do philosophers have to modify their thkg about eternal recurrence if that ia is proposed by a gay man wh nightmar and fantasi, rather than a “sexls tellectual wh a wals motache?

” Would we have to rethk the Categoril Imperative if new rearch revealed that Kant and Lampe were gay lovers? It might well be possible that Nietzsche’s hidn homosexualy helps expla passag Zarathtra; if so, is so much more unfortunate that the Zarathtra mentary was exclud om the translatn. But at any rate, the nnectn between Nietzsche’s hidn homosexualy and central them, such as the ath of God and eternal recurrence, remas obscure.