Many Brons have changed their mds on gay marriage

California voters will be asked to affirm gay marriage rights on the 2024 ballot followg Prop. 8 ncerns about the state nstutn. * scalia and gay marriage *

His argument is that the ncept of gay marriage is new and therefore not clud. The Jtic the majory claim the thory to nfer nstutnal protectn upon that right simply bee they believe that is fundamental, " Alo also reaffirmed his posn that there is no way to nfirm what the oute of gay marriage may be on the stutn of tradnal marriage, and therefore the Court is and should not be a posn to take on the "For lennia, marriage was extribly lked to the one thg that only an oppose-sex uple n do: procreate.

Their basic argument is that Stat formalize and promote marriage, unlike other fulfillg human relatnships, orr to enurage potentially procreative nduct to take place wh a lastg un that has long been thought to provi the bt atmosphere for raisg that the majory has led favor of gay marriage, Alo offered a stark warng about future nflict between relig liberty and progrsive ias. Rellg the harsh treatment of gays and lbians the past, some may thk that turnabout is fair play.

His many reflectns on homosexualy formed a notable part of his judicial legacy. This story was published March 2013, as the urt prepared to hear historic gay rights s. ” Judgg by the thgs he has said urt or wrten his legal opns about gays and lbians, he don’t really mean .

JTICE SLIA'S GAY MARRIAGE ADVICE: 'ASK THE NEART HIPPIE'

Dpe Slia’s long public history of exprsg revulsn and ntempt for gays and lbians, on the subject of whether people of the same sex should be allowed to marry, he is among the ne people whose opns will really matter.

Here are the lowlights of Slia’s anti-gay ments:. Texas, the se challengg a Texas law that crimalized homosexual sex, Slia me up wh a tastels analogy to illtrate the issue. Let’s throw gay people jail bee some people don’t like them.

In his dissent Lawrence, Slia argued that moral objectns to homosexualy were sufficient jtifitn for crimalizg gay sex.

CALIFORNIA STILL HAS AN ANTI-GAY MARRIAGE LAW ON THE BOOKS. VOTERS ULD REMOVE NEXT YEAR

“Many Amerins do not want persons who openly engage homosexual nduct as partners their bs, as sutmasters for their children, as teachers their children’s schools, or as boarrs their home, ” he wrote. Laws banng homosexual sex are like laws banng murr. Surely that is the only sort of ‘anim’ at issue here: moral disapproval of homosexual nduct[.

Slia cid to take the “moral disapproval” argument up a notch his dissent Lawrence, wrg that the Texas ban on homosexual sex “unniably seeks to further the belief of s cizens that certa forms of sexual behavr are ‘immoral and unacceptable, '” like laws agast “fornitn, bigamy, adultery, adult ct, btialy, and obsceny. Homosexual upl are like roommat. “[Colorado’s ban] prohibs special treatment of homosexuals, and nothg more, ” Slia wrote.

“[I]t would prevent the State or any municipaly om makg ath benef payments to the ‘life partner’ of a homosexual when do not make such payments to the long time roommate of a nonhomosexual employee.

THE BCHIT QUOT OM SLIA’S GAY MARRIAGE DISSENT

In one sectn, he plas that banng discrimatn based on sexual orientatn hirg amounts to grantg gays and lbians special treatment that Republins, adulterers, and Cubs haters don’t get.

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE SYMPOSIUM: JTICE SLIA’S NSTUTNAL SE FOR GAY MARRIAGE

Have gays and lbians tried NOT havg homosexual sex? ” But Slia poted out that gays and lbians uld jt have sex wh people of the oppose sex stead. “Men and women, heterosexuals and homosexuals, are all subject to [Texas’] prohibn of viate sexual terurse wh someone of the same sex.

Perhaps no cha of s monstrated this better than Slia's very nsistent opposn to gay rights. In his view, wasn't so much that he was opposed to gay rights — although he was — but that such rights simply weren't protected by a very origalist terpretatn of the Constutn and s amendments. Slia's opposn to gay rights showed his brand of nservatism.

Slia was a nsistent opponent of nstutnal claims ma on behalf of gay rights. At the heart of Slia's opposn to gay rights was his view that the US Constutn simply did not protect the rights of gay people. So the three major s that me to the urt sce 2003, Slia oped agast gay rights sometim btal dissents.

CALIFORNIA VOTERS WILL BE ASKED TO REAFFIRM GAY MARRIAGE PROTECTNS ON 2024 BALLOT

His lleagu, of urse, argued that the 14th Amendment protected gay people — by forbiddg any level of ernment om passg discrimatory laws that nied people their fundamental rights. Slia rejected the view, claimg the Constutn, the 14th Amendment, and their amers ma no mentn of gay rights and therefore did not tend to protect gay people. Texas 2003, where the Court led that stat' anti-sodomy laws — which effectively banned gay sex — were unnstutnal, Slia warned his dissent that the logic ed to strike down the lg uld upend stat' laws agast same-sex marriage:.

The Supreme Court reasoned that all the anti-gay laws were unnstutnal for largely the same reason: They discrimated agast a group of people by whholdg fundamental rights and vlated the 14th Amendment. Slia's stance on gay rights monstrated his origalist view: He believed the Constutn uldn't protect gay rights, bee no one uld envisn, for example, same-sex marriage as an issue back when the Constutn and s amendments were wrten. So Slia's view, the urt's pro–gay rights cisns read rights and lims to the Constutn that simply didn't exist, and therefore allowed the Court to strike down laws that were, his opn, nstutnally valid.

Homosexual sodomy? A report about Slia’s speech the Memphis Commercial Appeal ced his explanatn that his arguments agast Supreme Court cisns related to abortn and same-sex marriage were not based on the validy of others’ beliefs that abortn should be legal or homosexual people should be allowed to marry.

GAY STUNT ASKS JTICE SLIA TO FEND HIS 'BTIALY' MENTS

He cloaked his opn warm words for the gay rights activists he knew would cheer the urt's actn.

JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS ASSISTANT COACH KEV MAXEN MAK HISTORY AFTER COMG OUT AS GAY

"However heartened the proponents of same-sex marriage might be on this day, is worth acknowledgg what they have lost, and lost forever: the opportuny to w the te acceptance that om persuadg their fellow cizens of the jtice of their e, " he source, Getty ImagImage ptn, Jtice Anton Slia lls the gay marriage cisn a "judicial Putsch"It is the role of legislatur to terme social policy, he nclud, not judg. "The majory opn, as one might expect given the snt evince that the pla text of the Constutn explicly guarante a right to gay marriage, is a total ms, " they wre.

""Gay marriage isn't a game or a mere wedge issue, " tweets Brebart's John Nolte. Simply bee the majory of the voters don’t like homosexualy (or at least didn’t 2004), ” wrote Black (the ellips and parenthis are his). Magleby, reprentg a gay male uple and two lbian upl, relied part on Slia's terpretatn of the majory's DOMA cisn,.

“In Strikg Down Utah’s Gay Marriage Ban, Judge Giv Slia Big Bear Hug, ” read the headle on the liberal Talkg Pots Universy of Illois law profsor Jason Mazzone set off a hot bate on the legal webse Balkizatn when he wrote that Shelby's opn "would have appeared nsirably more judicial had he risted the urge to give Jtice Slia the fger.

Recent Posts

Tags

Contents:

READ SLIA GAY MARRIAGE DISSENT: SUPREME COURT JTICE SLAMS 'CONSTUTNAL REVISN'

WHY FOUR JTIC WERE AGAST THE SUPREME COURT'S HUGE GAY-MARRIAGE DECISN

ANTON SLIA ROUTELY LED AGAST GAY RIGHTS. THOSE OPNS EXPLA HIS PHILOSOPHY.

GAY MARRIAGE: IT'S A 'JUDICIAL PUTSCH' WARNS DISSENTG SLIA