The are the first figur to be released relatg to gay divorc as same sex marriag have only been possible England and Wal sce March 29 2014.
Contents:
- HOMOSEXUALY, DIVORCE AND GAY MARRIAGE
- NEW DIVORCE STATISTICS SHOW FIRST LEGAL GAY MARRIAG SOUR
- WHY LBIAN UPL ARE MORE LIKELY TO DIVORCE THAN GAY ON
- HOW TO FILE FOR GAY DIVORCE
HOMOSEXUALY, DIVORCE AND GAY MARRIAGE
Divorce is newer for LGBTQ people, but don't need to make broker. Here’s what you need to succsfully navigate gay divorce and not go broke. * gay marriage divorce uk *
Rears may wonr what I fd mon between homosexualy and divorce, except that I n loosely tegorise them unr “genr issu”.
NEW DIVORCE STATISTICS SHOW FIRST LEGAL GAY MARRIAG SOUR
* gay marriage divorce uk *
This is nothg to do wh the endg of gay marriag or “civil partnerships”. But is all about how a proper unrstandg of the biblil teachg on divorce, which I discsed here recently, may also be helpful fdg a Christian approach to homosexualy.
The same prcipl, seems to me, n be applied to homosexual activy.
WHY LBIAN UPL ARE MORE LIKELY TO DIVORCE THAN GAY ON
We n start by notg that homosexual activy should not be nsired a worse s than wrong heterosexual activy: the Bible passag where homosexual acts are nmned, such as Levic 18 and 1 Corthians 6:9-10, also nmn the same terms heterosexual adultery, ct etc.
HOW TO FILE FOR GAY DIVORCE
But, if we believe as we should that homosexual activy is no worse than heterosexual activy outsi marriage, then we n see that by the same prciple special arrangements would be appropriate for those who nnot accept the strict teachg on marriage bee of their homosexual orientatn. If the same prcipl are extend to homosexual relatnships, the ncln mt be that they should be regulated a siar way, such that homosexual activy is allowed only wh long term mted relatnships, not as unrtricted sleepg around. The cleart way of regulatn is to make formal arrangements for some kd of gay or lbian marriage.
On this basis, would be nsistent for Christians to view homosexuals a civil partnership, and fahful to that partnership, as an equivalent posn to people who are divorced and remarried. If, as at least the Church of Wal, the latter n be bishops, then no logic remas not allowg a gay person a civil partnership to be a bishop.