Called a Gay Manifto, this is really Carl Wtman's personal views on beg a Gay male 1970. In addn to cricisg homophobia also cricis the attus and strategi of the Gay Lib movement and offers some alternativ. Also clus some very personal beliefs and observatns.
Contents:
- THE GAY AGENDA BLUEPRT: A PLAN TO TRANSFORM AMERI
- HOW GAY ACTIVISTS CHALLENGED THE POLICS OF CIVILY
- GAY HISTORY – READ: THE GAY REVOLUTNARY A.K.A. THE GAY MANIFTO BY MICHAEL SWIFT – 1987
- DETAILS OF THE ‘HIDDEN GAY AGENDA” CONSPIRACY THEORY
- TAG: GAY MANIFTO
THE GAY AGENDA BLUEPRT: A PLAN TO TRANSFORM AMERI
A radil manifto for gay liberatn published by the Marxist cell of the US Gay Liberatn Front 1970. * gay manifesto 1987 *
And has bee fact and the "Amerin Way" as promulgated by the Uned Stat Supreme Court as manipulated by the gay cult and Inrrigible Liberal Loons of the entropic prs & media. Gays will beg to turn on to women when 1) 's somethg that we do bee we want to, and not bee we should, and 2) when women's liberatn chang the nature of heterosexual relatnships. The existence of a lbian uc wh the New York Gay Liberatn Front has been very helpful challengg male chvism among gay guys, and anti-gay feelgs among women's lib.
The married guy who mak on the si secretly; the guy who will go to bed once but won't velop any gay relatnships; the pretenr at work or school who chang the genr of the iend he's talkg about; the guy who'll suck ck the bh but won't go to bed. Self-opprsn: As gay liberatn grows, we will fd our uptight brothers and sisters, particularly those who are makg a buck off our ghetto, g on strong to fend the stat quo. If we are willg to label ourselv publicly not only as homosexual but as sick, then we qualify for ferment; and if we're not ‘discreet’ (dishont) we get dmmed out of the service.
HOW GAY ACTIVISTS CHALLENGED THE POLICS OF CIVILY
The startlg shift Amerin attus toward gays and same-sex marriage is not the rult of chance or random events. More than a quarter century ago, gay strategists laid out a plan to transform the natn—wh astoundg succs. * gay manifesto 1987 *
At that pot, objectifitn eclips people, and exprs self-hatred: “I hate gay people, and I don't like myself, but if a stud (or chicken) wants to make wh me, I n pretend I'm someone other than me. And as for child moltg, the overwhelmg amount is done by straight guys to ltle girls: is not particularly a gay problem, and is ed by the tratns rultg form anti-sex puranism. Police or n men who shake down the straight gay return for not revealg him; the bookstor and movie makers who keep raisg pric bee they are the only outlet for pornography; heads of ‘molg’ agenci and other pimps who explo both the htlers and the johns — the are the paras who flourish the ghetto.
2) a lbian uc is probably the bt way to attack gay guys' male chvism, and challenge the straightns of women's liberatn; 3) as mal we mt be sensive to their velopg inti as women, and rpect that; if we know what our eedom is about, they certaly know what's bt for them. Gay Liberatn is stgglg for a self-unrstandg which would probe eply enough to the of our opprsn to give a clear visn of the forms and directns our stggle mt take. Wtman has provid an analysis of homosexual opprsn Ameri which lks the dividual-psychologil experienc of opprsn to the social and enomic facts which are at once the and effects of this suatn.
Most importantly, Wtman's “Manifto” provis a clear statement of Gay Liberatn's goal: to ee ourselv as gays and to ee straight society as much as reprs s own homosexual aspects. This problem is pecially acute for our movement sce so much of our opprsn nsists precisely beg forced to choose between a personal life a gay ghetto or a -personalized life straight society — ually to the triment of dividual growth, no matter which optn is taken.
GAY HISTORY – READ: THE GAY REVOLUTNARY A.K.A. THE GAY MANIFTO BY MICHAEL SWIFT – 1987
n Febary of 1987, a satiril article by Michael Swift appeared New York Cy's Gay Communy News tled "The Gay Revolutnary" * gay manifesto 1987 *
The homosexual who his his inty for the sake of the polil movement, the good of his fay or whatever, is likely to n to the dilemma of all “borg om wh”; the abily to effect change bee he is not regnized for what he is or has actually fotten who he is himself. ” There Kirk, a rearcher nropsychiatry, and Madsen, a public relatns nsultant, laid out a blueprt to fundamentally change Amerins’ attus toward homosexuals and homosexualy. Gallup polls 1989 showed that only 19 percent of Amerins believed people were born homosexual, wh 48 percent believg was due to environmental factors such as upbrgg.
Well-rearched surveys (as opposed to some wh markedly skewed sampl and/or methodology) have nsistently placed the homosexual populatn of Ameri at around 2 to 3 percent—yet the fluence of homosexuals on Amerin culture is vastly out of proportn wh their actual numbers. A USA Today article last year reported 32 regularly appearg bisexual or homosexual characters primetime work scripted seri for the 2014-15 televisn season, wh another 64 appearg ble TV shows (Bill Keveney, “Y, You Really Are Seeg More LGBT Characters on TV, ” Oct.
DETAILS OF THE ‘HIDDEN GAY AGENDA” CONSPIRACY THEORY
For nearly 20 years, anti-gay Amerin Christian fundamentalists have been phg the notn that there is a secret "homosexual agenda" that is n by a worldwi central thory that stcts "ant homosexual activists" on how to "stroy the fay" and "brawash people to acceptg homosexual behavur as normal". Well, AGFC has been aware for que… * gay manifesto 1987 *
This means publicizg support for gays by more morate church, raisg theologil objectns of our own about nservative terpretatns of biblil teachgs, and exposg hatred and nsistency. They ntued: “Send, we n unrme the moral thory of homophobic church by portrayg them as antiquated backwaters, badly out of step wh the tim and wh the latt fdgs of psychology.
TAG: GAY MANIFTO
* gay manifesto 1987 *
Some who have stood up have been fed, orred to attend pro-homosexual “sensivy trag, ” lost jobs or had their bs sued out of existence by ernment agents and agenci that support the homosexual agenda.
“If gays are prented, stead, as a strong and priful tribe promotg a rigidly nonnformist and viant liftyle, they are more likely to be seen as a public menace that jtifi ristance and opprsn. This means that jnty mtached mclemen would keep very low profile gay mercials and other public prentatns, while sympathetic figur of nice young people, old people, and attractive women would be featured. They then add this utn for those who would want to ph the gay agenda too far: “It almost go whout sayg that groups on the fartht marg of acceptabily such as NAMBLA [the North Amerin Man-Boy Love Associatn, which as s name suggts promot adult-child homosexual sex] mt play no part at all such a mpaign: spected child-molters will never look like victims...
The gay muny should no longer be nsired victims the Uned Stat—and realy those the gay movement have bee aggrsive challengers of tradnal valu and biblil beliefs on many onts. “A media mpaign that sts gays as society’s victims and enurag straights to be their protectors mt make easier for those to rpond to assert and expla their new protectivens. But an addnal theme of the mpaign should be more aggrsive and upbeat: to offset the creasgly bad prs that the tim have brought to homosexual men and women, the mpaign should pat gays as superr pillars of society.
Posts about The Gay Manifto wrten by Orphic Hymn * gay manifesto 1987 *
To this end, they then suggted that those who oppose the homosexual agenda be lked wh imag such as the Ku Klux Klan, “bigoted southern misters droolg wh hysteril hatred, ” thugs and nvicts, and Nazi ncentratn mps.
This strategy—aid and abetted by sympathetic news media and ernment agenci—has led to enterg a stage of aggrsive attacks by some the gay muny agast those who scerely believe that homosexual behavr vlat the laws, stctns and prcipl of God. Yet at the same time, they ma a statement showg that gays really aren’t the opprsed, victimized group Kirk and Madsen advote they be portrayed as: “Bee those gays not supportg fai ually have more discretnary e than average, they uld afford to ntribute much more.
Supreme Court’s lg legalizg same-sex marriage, ’s bee they regnize this simple fact: Homosexual upl, who typilly don’t have children, have substantially more discretnary e than fai who do.