Contents:
WORLD VISN, GAY MARRIAGE & JUDGMENT
1:10) that have tradnally been read as prohibg homosexualy. The biblil fn of “s” is “missg the mark” (hamartia), and on the basis of this scriptural evince, I have to regard homosexualy as “missg the mark” of God’s ial. So y, I regard homosexualy to be a s.
First, there are a number of scholars who argue that the six passag are not as clear cut nouncg all forms of homosexualy as they may ially seem. 1 that is ually translated as “homosexualy” (arsenakoai) is very ambiguo. Also, some scholars argue that the kd of homosexualy Pl had md when wrg Romans 1 would have been the kd typilly practiced by Romans and would not have clud lovg, rpectful, monogamo mted relatnships.
Send, there is absolutely no jtifitn for the way many Christians today make homosexualy out to be worse than other typ of s. Judgg om the way certa Christian lears have publicly csad agast homosexualy, you’d thk was the number one s the Bible and the most damagg s to society. Yet, while we have at most six vers the Bible that mentn homosexualy, we have around 3, 000 passag that addrs greed, gluttony and the need to re for the poor.