Relatnship Factors Associated wh Gay Male Coupl’ Conrdance on Aspects of Their Sexual Agreements: Establishment, Type, and Adherence - PMC

Contents:

• 10 TIPS TO CHOOSE WEDDG RGS FOR GAY COUPL
• GAY COUPL CAN TEACH STRAIGHT PEOPLE A THG OR TWO ABOUT ARGUG
• AGE DIFFERENC GAY COUPL
• HOW AGE DIFFERENCE AND SOCIAL INEQUALI AFFECT RELATNSHIPS A GAY COUPLE
• RELATNSHIP FACTORS ASSOCIATED WH GAY MALE COUPL’ CONRDANCE ON ASPECTS OF THEIR SEXUAL AGREEMENTS: ESTABLISHMENT, TYPE, AND ADHERENCE

10 TIPS TO CHOOSE WEDDG RGS FOR GAY COUPL

We tted petg hypoth about the stabily of same-sex vers different-sex habg upl that were guid by plete stutnalizatn, mory strs, relatnship vtments, and uple homogamy perspectiv (predictg that same-sex upl would be ls stable) as well as enomic rourc (predictg that same-sex upl would be more stable). From the plete stutnalizatn, mory strs, relatnship vtments, and uple homogamy perspectiv, we anticipate that same-sex habg upl are ls stable. Explanatns for RelatnshipStabily Same-sex upl may experience lower levels of relatnship stabily bee of plete stutnalizatn, mory strs, relatnship vtments, and uple homogamy.

Cohabg wh a member of the same sex may generate strs bee reprents a public prentatn of a gay or lbian dividual wh their levels of stabily may be observed among same-sex upl partly bee of socmographic ditors, the prence of children, and uple homogamy terms of age, race, and tn.

Send, homogamy is associated wh greater stabily among different-sex upl (Bratter and Kg 2008; Phillips and Sweeney 2006; Teachman 2002).

GAY COUPL CAN TEACH STRAIGHT PEOPLE A THG OR TWO ABOUT ARGUG

Prr work dit that homogamy (age, race/ethnicy, tn) is lower among same-sex than different-sex upl (Rosenfeld and Kim 2005; Schwartz and Graf 2009).

AGE DIFFERENC GAY COUPL

Gays and lbians who live stat wh supportive polici (employment discrimatn and bullyg laws) targeted at sexual mori experience lower levels of ser psychologil ndns (Hatzenbuehler et al. Overall, same-sex habg upl may be more protected agast dissolutn than are different-sex habg upl bee the former posss characteristics associated wh lower dissolutn, cludg higher e and tn; however, same-sex habg upl may receive ls support for their relatnships, ls often have relatnship vtments (children), and are ls homogamo terms of age and 1Couple characteristics, by unn typeCohabg CouplMarried Coupl. We found that same-sex and different-sex habg upl share siar levels of relatnship rults belie several perspectiv monly ed to expla variatn relatnship stabily, cludg plete stutnalizatn, mory strs, relatnship vtment, uple homogamy, and socmographic perspectiv.

HOW AGE DIFFERENCE AND SOCIAL INEQUALI AFFECT RELATNSHIPS A GAY COUPLE

Th, the policy ntext appears to play some role the stabily of habg relatnships, and attentn to other polici related to lbian and gay protectns is warranted. 2We e the terms “homogamy” and “heterogamy” as they are monly ed mographic rearch on habatn (Blackwell and Lichter 2004; Schwartz 2010), but we regnize that the terms technilly refer to marriage. Demographics of the gay and lbian populatn the Un Stat: Evince om available systematic data rourc.

Homogamy among datg, habg, and married upl.

State-level polici and psychiatric morbidy lbian, gay, and bisexual populatns. Relatnship out and their predictors: Longudal evince om heterosexual married, gay habg, and lbian habg upl. Are gay and lbian habg upl really different om heterosexual married upl?

RELATNSHIP FACTORS ASSOCIATED WH GAY MALE COUPL’ CONRDANCE ON ASPECTS OF THEIR SEXUAL AGREEMENTS: ESTABLISHMENT, TYPE, AND ADHERENCE

Mory strs and mental health gay men.

Pathways to tnal homogamy maral and habg unns. Same-sex upl, same-sex partnerships & homosexual marriag. Physil Preferenc for Partners among Gay Men.