When we talk about gen for anythg, like a gene for beg gay or a gene for beg aggrsive or somethg of that sort, that a gene for anythg may not have been a gene for that thg unr different environmental ndns.
Contents:
- WHY MY WIFE AND I DECID TO ABORT OUR UNBORN GAY SON
- THE REAL STORY ON GAY GEN
- RICHARD DAWKS EXPLAS HOW THE GAY GENE WAS PRERVED
- RUMORS OF THE ‘GAY GENE’ HAVE BEEN GREATLY EXAGGERATED
- THE LIFE OF THE GAY GENE: OM HYPOTHETIL GEIC MARKER TO SOCIAL REALY
WHY MY WIFE AND I DECID TO ABORT OUR UNBORN GAY SON
It is an tertg exercise to look at how geic ntributns of homosexualy may have been prerved and passed down by our anctors. Dr. Richard Dawks' take on the evolutn of the "gay gene" is fascatg, elegant, and que clever. * dawkins gay gene *
My last post, The Gay Bra, really got some of you talkg. The central this of the vio was that even though scientists have yet to intify the "gay gene, " the vast nsens the scientific muny is that homosexualy has a strong geic basis, based on multiple studi that pot to herabily of LGBT intifitn and behavr. Many scientists believe that there is not jt one gay gene, but fact a multu of geic markers that are eher swched on or off by a plex dance of epigeic and environmental factors.
Eher way, nnot be nied that beg gay is rooted one's the end of the post, I asked what all of this means om an evolutnary perspective. Chosenfew79 left a ment that summariz the qutns that were raised by many of you:If we look at this qutn om the perspective of morn humans, appears to be somewhat short-sighted, sce we all know that gay men and lbian women n produce offsprg jt like heterosexual men and women n. In addn, om a morn perspective, we know that homosexualy is not a behavr per se, is an inty, a pot that was raised, sensively and betifully, by many menters throughout this om the perspective of simple scientific cursy, I thk that chosenfew79 rais an extremely valid query.
THE REAL STORY ON GAY GEN
* dawkins gay gene *
But, om a historil perspective, is an tertg exercise to look at how geic ntributns of homosexualy may have been prerved and passed down by our knows evolutn better than Dr.
Richard Dawks, and his take on the evolutn of the "gay gene" is fascatg, elegant, and que clever. Follow Cara Santa Maria on Twter: UnclehomosexualyEdutnTalk Nerdy To MePopular the CommunyYou May Like. Richard Dawks, who is a liberal, speculat that a "gay gene" homosexualy, but science has not disvered such a gene (see: Cs of homosexualy)[1] In 1993, Profsor Miron Baron, M.
RICHARD DAWKS EXPLAS HOW THE GAY GENE WAS PRERVED
D., the renowned medil rearcher and Profsor at Columbia Universy, wrote BMJ (Brish Medil Journal) that there is a nflict relative to the theory of evolutn and the notn of geic termism ncerng homosexualy. An evolutnary perspective, geilly termed homosexualy would have bee extct long ago bee of rced reproductn. [3] Also, the Uned Stat, twice as many liberals as nservativ (46% vers 22%) believe people are born homosexual and liberals generally have more favorable opns about homosexualy.
RUMORS OF THE ‘GAY GENE’ HAVE BEEN GREATLY EXAGGERATED
Miron Baron's mentary about homosexualy, many Amerin liberals are nsistent on the issu of evolutn and homosexualy.
THE LIFE OF THE GAY GENE: OM HYPOTHETIL GEIC MARKER TO SOCIAL REALY
An dividual's beliefs regardg creatn science/creatnism and the theory of evolutn appear to fluence their views on homosexualy. [5][6] Creatn Mistri Internatnal stat: "Homosexual acts go agast God’s origal sign of a man and a woman beg one flh — see Genis 1 and 2, endorsed by J Himself Matthew 19:3–6.
"[7] In addn, the vast majory of creatn scientists reject the notn of geic termism ncerng the orig of homosexualy.
Geics, Homosexualy, Evolutnary Paradigm, and Creatn Science. Relig Upbrgg and Culture Affects Rat of Homosexualy.