Richard Dawks explas how the gay gene was prerved | Anglin Samizdat

Contents:

• WHY MY WIFE AND I DECID TO ABORT OUR UNBORN GAY SON
• THE REAL STORY ON GAY GEN
• RICHARD DAWKS EXPLAS HOW THE GAY GENE WAS PRERVED
• RUMORS OF THE ‘GAY GENE’ HAVE BEEN GREATLY EXAGGERATED
• THE LIFE OF THE GAY GENE: OM HYPOTHETIL GEIC MARKER TO SOCIAL REALY

WHY MY WIFE AND I DECID TO ABORT OUR UNBORN GAY SON

My last post, The Gay Bra, really got some of you talkg.

The central this of the vio was that even though scientists have yet to intify the "gay gene, " the vast nsens the scientific muny is that homosexualy has a strong geic basis, based on multiple studi that pot to herabily of LGBT intifitn and behavr. Many scientists believe that there is not jt one gay gene, but fact a multu of geic markers that are eher swched on or off by a plex dance of epigeic and environmental factors. Eher way, nnot be nied that beg gay is rooted one's the end of the post, I asked what all of this means om an evolutnary perspective.

THE REAL STORY ON GAY GEN

Chosenfew79 left a ment that summariz the qutns that were raised by many of you:If we look at this qutn om the perspective of morn humans, appears to be somewhat short-sighted, sce we all know that gay men and lbian women n produce offsprg jt like heterosexual men and women n. In addn, om a morn perspective, we know that homosexualy is not a behavr per se, is an inty, a pot that was raised, sensively and betifully, by many menters throughout this om the perspective of simple scientific cursy, I thk that chosenfew79 rais an extremely valid query. But, om a historil perspective, is an tertg exercise to look at how geic ntributns of homosexualy may have been prerved and passed down by our knows evolutn better than Dr.

Richard Dawks, and his take on the evolutn of the "gay gene" is fascatg, elegant, and que clever.

Follow Cara Santa Maria on Twter: UnclehomosexualyEdutnTalk Nerdy To MePopular the CommunyYou May Like. Richard Dawks, who is a liberal, speculat that a "gay gene" homosexualy, but science has not disvered such a gene (see: Cs of homosexualy)[1] In 1993, Profsor Miron Baron, M. D., the renowned medil rearcher and Profsor at Columbia Universy, wrote BMJ (Brish Medil Journal) that there is a nflict relative to the theory of evolutn and the notn of geic termism ncerng homosexualy.

RICHARD DAWKS EXPLAS HOW THE GAY GENE WAS PRERVED

An evolutnary perspective, geilly termed homosexualy would have bee extct long ago bee of rced reproductn. [3] Also, the Uned Stat, twice as many liberals as nservativ (46% vers 22%) believe people are born homosexual and liberals generally have more favorable opns about homosexualy. Miron Baron's mentary about homosexualy, many Amerin liberals are nsistent on the issu of evolutn and homosexualy.

An dividual's beliefs regardg creatn science/creatnism and the theory of evolutn appear to fluence their views on homosexualy.

[5][6] Creatn Mistri Internatnal stat: "Homosexual acts go agast God’s origal sign of a man and a woman beg one flh — see Genis 1 and 2, endorsed by J Himself Matthew 19:3–6.

RUMORS OF THE ‘GAY GENE’ HAVE BEEN GREATLY EXAGGERATED

"[7] In addn, the vast majory of creatn scientists reject the notn of geic termism ncerng the orig of homosexualy. Geics, Homosexualy, Evolutnary Paradigm, and Creatn Science.

Relig Upbrgg and Culture Affects Rat of Homosexualy.

Richard Dawks has acced the God of the Old Ttament of beg homophobic. [9] Yet, Dawks has not explaed why God, who is scribed as an all powerful spirual beg the Old Ttament, would be aaid of homosexuals.

THE LIFE OF THE GAY GENE: OM HYPOTHETIL GEIC MARKER TO SOCIAL REALY

↑ Richard Dawks speculat that gene for homosexualy exists. They found the gen that e homosexualy and they tt for them now.

I don’t know how I feel about tryg to raise a gay son. I know thgs are gettg better for gay people, but seems to me that beg gay is really hard the South, where we live.

Gay people aren’t really accepted here like other parts of the untry yet.