The Gay Agenda Blueprt: A Plan to Transform Ameri | Uned Church of God

Contents:

• THE GAY AGENDA BLUEPRT: A PLAN TO TRANSFORM AMERI
• THE ‘GAY AGENDA,’ EXPLAED
• FALLY THE GREAT GAY AGENDA IS WORKG! TWICE AS MANY OF NOW INTIFY AS LGBTQ+
• THE ANTI-GAY AGENDA
• RPONDG TO THE 'GAY AGENDA': THREE REASONS WHY DIALOGUE MIGHT BE AN APPROPRIATE RPONSE
• REEMG THE RABOW: A CHRISTIAN RPONSE TO THE 'GAY' AGENDA
• THE GAY AGENDA: A MORN QUEER HISTORY & HANDBOOK
• REEMG THE RABOW: A CHRISTIAN RPONSE TO THE “GAY” AGENDA
• GAY AGENDA’S INTIMIDATN TACTICS WON’T STOP ME FROM SPEAKG TTH
• ANYTHG BUT STRAIGHT: UNMASKG THE SNDALS AND LI BEHD THE EX-GAY MYTH
• THE GAY AGENDA: A MORN QUEER HISTORY & HANDBOOK HARDVER – ILLTRATED, APRIL 28, 2020
• THE GAY AGENDA UNDATED CALENDAR CALENDAR – ENGAGEMENT CALENDAR, JUNE 18, 2019
• UNMASKG THE “GAY” AGENDA

THE GAY AGENDA BLUEPRT: A PLAN TO TRANSFORM AMERI

Yet the homosexual movement — led by extremist homosexual prsure groups like the so-lled Human Rights Campaign (HRC) — reprent, per pa, one of Ameri’s most powerful and well-fund polil lobbi.

Through a refully crafted, s-old propaganda mpaign, homosexual activists have succsfully st homosexuals — many of whom enjoy posns of fluence and affluence — as a disadvantaged mory.

Ultimately, the homosexual lobby’s primary objective is to radilly refe our foundatnal stutns of legimate marriage and the nuclear fay by unravelg God’s natural sign for human sexualy.

THE ‘GAY AGENDA,’ EXPLAED

But the prcipl they foist mand prehensive acceptance of homosexual nduct — by force of law — through feral edicts such as “hate crim” legislatn, the so-lled “Employment Non-Discrimatn Act” (ENDA) and by imposg ernment sanctned “same-sex marriage.

Anyone who believ the Biblil directive that human sexualy is a gift om God, to be shared between man and wife wh the bonds of marriage, is brand “homophobic, ” “hateful” or “discrimatory. It would legally allow pedophil, and homosexuals who were so cled, to accs your children and teens for their own predatory sexual gratifitn — so long as those children “nsented” to havg sex. In their mancript, After the Ball: How Ameri Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays the 90’s (1989, Doubleday/Bantam), Harvard ted marketg experts Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen meticuloly laid out the homosexual lobby’s blueprt for succs what is wily regard as the handbook for the “gay” agenda.

And gone are referenc to, or imag of, men and women trapped the homosexual liftyle who aimlsly seek to fill a spirual and emotnal void through promiscuo and meangls sexual enunters. “Associate all who oppose homosexualy wh imag of ‘Klansmen mandg that gays be slghtered, ’ ‘hysteril backwoods preachers, ’ ‘menacg punks, ’ and a ‘tour of Nazi ncentratn mps where homosexuals were tortured and gassed.

FALLY THE GREAT GAY AGENDA IS WORKG! TWICE AS MANY OF NOW INTIFY AS LGBTQ+

“Gays n unrme the moral thory of homo-hatg church over ls fervent adherents by portrayg [them] as antiquated backwaters, badly out of step … wh the latt fdgs of psychology. ” In orr to achieve wispread acceptance of “gayns, ” they had to remove the foc om what homosexualy really is (viant sexual nduct) and shift onto the craftily manufactured specter of “gay civil rights. ” There Kirk, a rearcher nropsychiatry, and Madsen, a public relatns nsultant, laid out a blueprt to fundamentally change Amerins’ attus toward homosexuals and homosexualy.

Well-rearched surveys (as opposed to some wh markedly skewed sampl and/or methodology) have nsistently placed the homosexual populatn of Ameri at around 2 to 3 percent—yet the fluence of homosexuals on Amerin culture is vastly out of proportn wh their actual numbers.

THE ANTI-GAY AGENDA

A USA Today article last year reported 32 regularly appearg bisexual or homosexual characters primetime work scripted seri for the 2014-15 televisn season, wh another 64 appearg ble TV shows (Bill Keveney, “Y, You Really Are Seeg More LGBT Characters on TV, ” Oct. This means publicizg support for gays by more morate church, raisg theologil objectns of our own about nservative terpretatns of biblil teachgs, and exposg hatred and nsistency. They ntued: “Send, we n unrme the moral thory of homophobic church by portrayg them as antiquated backwaters, badly out of step wh the tim and wh the latt fdgs of psychology.

Some who have stood up have been fed, orred to attend pro-homosexual “sensivy trag, ” lost jobs or had their bs sued out of existence by ernment agents and agenci that support the homosexual agenda. “If gays are prented, stead, as a strong and priful tribe promotg a rigidly nonnformist and viant liftyle, they are more likely to be seen as a public menace that jtifi ristance and opprsn. This means that jnty mtached mclemen would keep very low profile gay mercials and other public prentatns, while sympathetic figur of nice young people, old people, and attractive women would be featured.

They then add this utn for those who would want to ph the gay agenda too far: “It almost go whout sayg that groups on the fartht marg of acceptabily such as NAMBLA [the North Amerin Man-Boy Love Associatn, which as s name suggts promot adult-child homosexual sex] mt play no part at all such a mpaign: spected child-molters will never look like victims...

RPONDG TO THE 'GAY AGENDA': THREE REASONS WHY DIALOGUE MIGHT BE AN APPROPRIATE RPONSE

The gay muny should no longer be nsired victims the Uned Stat—and realy those the gay movement have bee aggrsive challengers of tradnal valu and biblil beliefs on many onts. “A media mpaign that sts gays as society’s victims and enurag straights to be their protectors mt make easier for those to rpond to assert and expla their new protectivens. But an addnal theme of the mpaign should be more aggrsive and upbeat: to offset the creasgly bad prs that the tim have brought to homosexual men and women, the mpaign should pat gays as superr pillars of society.

To this end, they then suggted that those who oppose the homosexual agenda be lked wh imag such as the Ku Klux Klan, “bigoted southern misters droolg wh hysteril hatred, ” thugs and nvicts, and Nazi ncentratn mps.

REEMG THE RABOW: A CHRISTIAN RPONSE TO THE 'GAY' AGENDA

This strategy—aid and abetted by sympathetic news media and ernment agenci—has led to enterg a stage of aggrsive attacks by some the gay muny agast those who scerely believe that homosexual behavr vlat the laws, stctns and prcipl of God. Yet at the same time, they ma a statement showg that gays really aren’t the opprsed, victimized group Kirk and Madsen advote they be portrayed as: “Bee those gays not supportg fai ually have more discretnary e than average, they uld afford to ntribute much more.

THE GAY AGENDA: A MORN QUEER HISTORY & HANDBOOK

Supreme Court’s lg legalizg same-sex marriage, ’s bee they regnize this simple fact: Homosexual upl, who typilly don’t have children, have substantially more discretnary e than fai who do. The impact of this is also beg felt the polil arena, where wealthy gays help bankroll mpaigns for sympathetic ndidat who will advance their terts and fund ads attackg those who stand for tradnal and biblil valu. “Bee most straightforward appeals are impossible, the Natnal Gay Task Force has had to cultivate quiet backroom liaisons wh broadst pani and newsrooms orr to make sure that issu important to the gay muny receive some verage.

Those who believe the Bible and re about the future of Ameri should be aware that today’s issu regardg the gay liftyle have been orchtrated by activists for more than 25 years.

REEMG THE RABOW: A CHRISTIAN RPONSE TO THE “GAY” AGENDA

Dulé Hill Talks The Wonr Years, Don Cheadle, & What Fans Approach Him ForOffEnglishI know you’re tired of me by now, but I jt saw somethg on social media accg you of beg part of the “gay agenda.

They unt on the fact that is easier for some people to bldly accept any narrative hand to them than is to dissect an accepted don’t you fear the gay agenda at least a ltle b? The tth is that if there were a “gay agenda, ” uld easily be erased by the overwhelmg “heterosexual agenda” that exists 99 percent of movi, mic and televisn shows popular culture. The tth is that I have yet to meet a gay person who says that they were heterosexual until they went to an airport bathroom, wore their pants too tight or found a disrd mancript of the “gay agenda.

GAY AGENDA’S INTIMIDATN TACTICS WON’T STOP ME FROM SPEAKG TTH

”The tth is, the claim of a fantastil, secret gay agenda is only about fear, ntrol and huckster, y, even though I have never seen the “gay agenda, ” I adm that I am a part of bee I am not aaid of gay people. I me out 20 years ago when “gay” was still an acceptable sult, you uld unt the number of out celebri on one hand and if you saw an LGBTQ+ character on TV there was a 99% chance they were a psychopath or a predator. Maybe they should terrogate their own prient terts other people’s love, get at the root and figure out why the ia of male timacy ril the past few weeks, several rappers have ma sensive — or full-on homophobic — statements about gay people.

Fend DaBaby, sayg that gay people had gone om beg bullied to dog the bullyg, simply bee they had mand acuntabily om DaBaby, urgg him to apologize and phg mic ftivals to drop him om their lps. About a week after DaBaby’s rant, Boosie Badazz, a hip-hop artist who me up the 1990s, went after Lil Nas X, one of the rare rappers who are openly, unapologetilly, explosns-of-glter gay, threateng to asslt me say first that the untry has quickly evolved on the acceptance of gayns, and that clus an evolutn among Black people.

I have always ntend that all of the -isms and -phobias are s, that a society that creat a hierarchy of humany wh whe, straight, cisgenr men at the apex, every person who is not whe or straight or cisgenr or male gets assigned a lower orr of that sense, racism and sexism, homophobia and transphobia all branch om the same one bias n fluence and amplify a society that treats racism as a sport, which each racial group is jockeyg agast the others, all of them shadowed by a culture of whe supremacy laced wh misogyny, anythg that rc your percentage of straight mal or “femiz” them is seen as weakeng the Black people bee agents agast Black power and Black liberatn, a weight on the this dulent this is adopted, traracial terror picks up where terracial terror left off. It is not the gay Black person who be an stment of a whe supremacist attack on Black masculy; is the Black homophobe who be the stment of opprsn agast his own is important to pot out that the racist and the homophobe often employ the same tactics.

ANYTHG BUT STRAIGHT: UNMASKG THE SNDALS AND LI BEHD THE EX-GAY MYTH

Homophob often e the same tactic, claimg that they are protectg children om is precisely the fense Boosie Badazz ed when appearg on “The Breakfast Club” rad show, at one pot seemgly exprsg a fear that if rappers didn’t speak out agast certa exprsns of gayns, an entire generatn of children uld be aga, to clarify: There is no amount of exposure that n make a straight man prefer a penis or a gay one prefer a vaga.

Sexual attractn and sexualy jt don’t work that this simplistic notn of sexualy oms is that there are also gay children who have known they were different for as long as they have known anythg, and those children serve reprentatn and visibily; they need to know that there is nothg wrong, broken or evil about them, so that they, too, n feel normal and seen.

THE GAY AGENDA: A MORN QUEER HISTORY & HANDBOOK HARDVER – ILLTRATED, APRIL 28, 2020

On Tuday, Boosie Badazz troduced the world to his gay manager an Instagram post an attempt to monstrate that he uld not be You n be racist wh Black iends and homophobic wh gay on.

Shepard provid a remr of the ser and cril mands for which gays and lbians agenda flts many stutns society for fosterg homophobic attus that lead to misnduct agast gaysand the Catholic Church ranks high on the list.

The Catholic Church, an enty intified wh a hierarchilly stctured learship and unpromisg relig and moral doctr, is often picted by gays and lbians as agast them and their agenda bee of s posns. Homosexual acts are always wrong bee the acts are ntrary to natural law and scriptural saidand nsistently rtatedmany church lears sist that the Catholic Church and s teachg supports rpect for homosexual persons and oppos discrimatn, huiatg remarks cludg jok and slurs, and the nial of legimate civil ratnale that unrgirds Catholic opposn to homosexual acts stems om the way the church unrstands the meang and purpose of sex: God created humans as male and female and signed their genal plementary for procreatn. This fundamental premise pruppos that the fay is the basic un of society and that the well-beg of society nnot be mataed unls the nuclear fay is gay agenda, radil opposn to Catholic teachg, do not hold that sexual acts between nsentg adults are immoral or that alternative liftylcludg same-sex upl and blogil or adoptive parenthood by homosexual persons or uplare ethilly problematic.

THE GAY AGENDA UNDATED CALENDAR CALENDAR – ENGAGEMENT CALENDAR, JUNE 18, 2019

Currently, official church teachg plac homosexual genal acts the same tegory as lyg, stealg and is a problem wh puttg homosexual acts to the same tegory as lyg and murr.

In ntrast, the homosexual act of a person wh a homosexual orientatn is nmned by church teachg whout regard for why the act is engaged , the circumstanc of the persons volved or the nsequenc for them as dividuals as well as for the broar society.

Moraly is th intified wh physil or blogil procs rather than wh human cisns about how to exercise sexualy lovg and rponsible natural law moraly is first and foremost ratnal, a theoretil cricism is ma that church teachg is not on firm ground when crafts s rponse to homosexual acts a blogistic ve that fails to take to acunt the tentns, circumstanc and nsequencall of which are herent aspects of human actns.

UNMASKG THE “GAY” AGENDA

Until more is unrstood about the gre and varieti of same-sex orientatn, mak sense to be far as empiril data om gays and lbians are ncerned, church lears need to listen orr to learn about sexual and spirual experienc of gay and lbian Catholics. As far as Scripture is ncerned, the church ironilly fds self the pany of fundamentalist evangelil Christians cg biblil vers as proof texts that homosexual acts are evil and ntrary to God’s will.

In light of the fact that the Catholic Church supports scientific study of Scripture, credibily for s teachgs on homosexualy mands a siar openns to Scripture scholarship to terme what moral guidance n be gleaned om Bible vers that seem at first glance to be germane to the ntemporary bate. This is not a task for Catholic lears alone, but there is no unrtimatg the signifince of the role they play tablishg fundamental sights about who gay and lbian people are and what standards they should observe their sexual nduct.