Gay Marriage - DOMA, 14th Amendment & Supreme Court | HISTORY

Contents:

• WHY THERE WILL NOT BE A ‘REVELATN ON GAY MARRIAGE’ LIKE THERE WAS WH BLACKS AND THE PRITHOOD.
• POLICY CHANG ANNOUNCED FOR MEMBERS GAY MARRIAG, CHILDREN OF LGBT PARENTS
• 31 BIBLE VERS ABOUT GAY MARRIAGE
• GAY MARRIAGE
• BIBLE VERS ABOUT GAY MARRIAGE
• A HYPOTHETIL REVELATN ON GAY MARRIAGE
• ONLE GAY MARRIAGE LICENSE SEEN AS GAME-CHANGER

WHY THERE WILL NOT BE A ‘REVELATN ON GAY MARRIAGE’ LIKE THERE WAS WH BLACKS AND THE PRITHOOD.

A group of homosexual activists recently published what they lled the “Queen Jam Bible”—an edn of Scripture wh eight vers eded orr to prevent “homophobic terpretatns. ” The implitn is that if the eight vers are tweaked, the Bible don’t have anythg to say nmng homosexualy or limg marriage to the venant unn of one man and one woman for life. Of urse, every book do not nta an explic mand agast homosexualy, and some mentns of marriage and fay assume the tradnal stcture rather than mendg explicly.

Levic 18:22 and 20:13 clearly nmn homosexualy.

(The vers are not merely prohibns agast havg homosexual relatns wh male prostut Molech’s temple, as the Queen Jam Bible asserts. Romans 1:26-27 nmns those who part om God’s plan for marriage and engage homosexual acts—a passage eded the Queen Jam.

POLICY CHANG ANNOUNCED FOR MEMBERS GAY MARRIAG, CHILDREN OF LGBT PARENTS

Ju also mentns Sodom and Gomorrah’s judgment, this time wh an explic mentn of their homosexual ss (verse 7).

One ment I often hear om progrsive Latter-day Sats is the notn that there will be a ‘revelatn on gay marriage’ jt like there was one on Blacks and the Prithood.

31 BIBLE VERS ABOUT GAY MARRIAGE

For the past few weeks, I have been havg a strong promptg to wre on this topic, so here is my attempt: The ia that eventually there will be a revelatn on gay marriage like there was wh blacks and the prithood expos false ias about the rtrictn on blacks and the prithood as well as ignorance on how the LGBTQ agenda is patible wh the Plan of Salvatn.

Gay Marriage. Now that we have tablished that the policy prohibg blacks om beg ordaed to the prithood was not a doctre, but a temporary policy and was not due to Brigham Young beg a racist, let’s addrs the notn of gay marriage only beg prohibed due to homophobia.

GAY MARRIAGE

The doctre behd why the church do not support gay marriage is actually the very re pillars of our doctre.

So when progrsive members of the Church say we need to be more lovg and accept gay marriage, they have missed the fundamental boat. To want the Church to accept and endorse gay marriage would be askg the Church to forsake the plan of salvatn and tell people to settle for ls than exaltatn. ” Therefore, The Church will stand for exaltatn and there will not be a ‘revelatn on gay marriage.

BIBLE VERS ABOUT GAY MARRIAGE

Children of parents who intify themselv as lbian, gay, bisexual, or transgenr may now be blsed as fants and baptized The Church of J Christ of Latter-day Sats whout First Princy approval, Print Dall H. Children of parents who intify themselv as lbian, gay, bisexual, or transgenr may be baptized, if the ctodial parents give permissn for the baptism and unrstand both the doctre that a baptized child will be tght and the venants he or she will be expected to make, said Print Oaks. Instead the “immoral nduct heterosexual and homosexual relatnship will be treated the same way, ” he said.

“I want anyone who is a member of the Church who is gay or lbian to know I believe you have a place the kgdom and I regnize that sometim may be difficult for you to see where you f the Lord’s Church, but you do. “There are many polil, legal, and social prsur for chang that would change the fn of marriage or -emphasize s importance, nfe genr, or homogenize the differenc between men and women that are sential to acplish God’s great Plan of Happs. Why there will not be a 'revelatn on gay marriage' like there was wh blacks and the Prithood.

A HYPOTHETIL REVELATN ON GAY MARRIAGE

Do not be ceived; neher fornitors, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effemate, nor homosexuals,. and immoral men and homosexuals and kidnappers and liars and perjurers, and whatever else is ntrary to sound teachg,.

Beg Gay.

ONLE GAY MARRIAGE LICENSE SEEN AS GAME-CHANGER

Gays. 1 more topics on Gay.

Early Years: Same-Sex Marriage Bans In 1970, jt one year after the historic Stonewall Rts that galvanized the gay rights movement, law stunt Richard Baker and librarian Jam McConnell applied for a marriage license Gerald Nelson rejected their applitn bee they were a same-sex uple, and a trial urt upheld his cisn. ” This lg effectively blocked feral urts om lg on same-sex marriage for s, leavg the cisn solely the hands of stat, which alt blow after blow to those hopg to see gay marriage beg 1973, for stance, Maryland beme the first state to create a law that explicly f marriage as a unn between a man and woman, a belief held by many nservative relig groups. Though the gay rights movement saw some advancements the 1970s and 1980s—such as Harvey Milk beg the first openly gay man elected to public office the untry 1977—the fight for gay marriage ma ltle headway for many years.

In 1989, the San Francis Board of Supervisors passed an ordance that allowed homosexual upl and unmarried heterosexual upl to register for domtic partnerships, which granted hospal visatn rights and other years later, the District of Columbia siarly passed a new law that allowed same-sex upl to register as domtic partners. C., 1993, the hight urt Hawaii led that a ban on same-sex marriage may vlate that state nstutn’s Equal Protectn Clse—the first time a state urt has ever ched toward makg gay marriage Hawaii Supreme Court sent the se—brought by a gay male uple and two lbian upl who were nied marriage licens 1990—back for further review to the lower First Circu Court, which 1991 origally dismissed the the state tried to prove that there was “pellg state tert” jtifyg the ban, the se would be tied up ligatn for the next three Defense of Marriage Act Opponents of gay marriage, however, did not s on their hnch. Congrs 1996 passed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which Print Bill Clton signed to didn’t ban gay marriage outright but specified that only heterosexual upl uld be granted feral marriage benefs.