Utilarianism and Gay Marriage Essay

Contents:

• GAY MARRIAGE AND ETHIL THEORI
• UTILARIANISM AND GAY MARRIAGE
• GAY MARRIAGE: VIRTUE ETHICS AND UTILARIANISM REARCH PAPER SAMPLE
• UTILARIANISM AND GAY MARRIAGE SAY
• RSIAN NSTUTN CHANGE ENDS HOP FOR GAY MARRIAGE
• 33 MAJOR PROS & CONS OF GAY MARRIAGE“GAY MARRIAGE ACCEPTANCE IS HAPPENG THE BLK OF AN EYE.”P. J. O’ROURKE, COMEDIANADVANTAG & DISADVANTAG OF GAY MARRIAGE

GAY MARRIAGE AND ETHIL THEORI

Siarly, beg able to lead whatever type of liftyle you fd most fortable (whether be a heterosexual, homosexual, asexual, or otherwise relatnship) allows for a muny to rema diverse and keep rigoro bate up which may lead to a better unrstandg of the tth or relatnships which n lead to greater happs of the society. Table of Contents Utilarianism and Gay Marriage Deontology and Gay Marriage Ethil Effects of Gay Marriag on the Society Gay Marriag Would Harm the Society Relativism and Gay Marriage Emotivism and Gay Marriag Introductn Profsor Michael Boylan stated his book “A Jt Society” that ethics is a science that als wh the right and wrong of human behavr (Boylan, 2004).

UTILARIANISM AND GAY MARRIAGE

Many untri cludg the followg untri have recently allowed gay marriag: Argenta, Canada, Denmark, Spa, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, South Ai, Swen and parts of Mexi and the Uned Stat of Ameri.

Deontology and Gay Marriage A ontologist’s view of gay marriage is almost siar to Utilarianism view sce they both base their iologi on the cisns of an dividual over those of the society.

To ntrast the two theori (utilarianism and ontology), we n say that utilarianism view on gay marriage is that the upl make their cisns believg the rults will be beneficial for larger proportn of people. A ontologist view is that gay people make their cisns wh the knowledge that whatever they are dog rpects life, equaly, and honty whout nsirg nsequenc of their actns, pecially the effects on the society. Relativism and Gay Marriage If marriage is relative, any uple, whether gay or not, n be uned acrdg to the laws of marriage and get divorced for whatever reason they have or even wh no reason totally.

GAY MARRIAGE: VIRTUE ETHICS AND UTILARIANISM REARCH PAPER SAMPLE

Otherwise, if gaysgetnied the privileg, the rultant effect might be ntroversy, disagreements, stggle, and unjt another utilarian standpot, provid one do not attempt to prive others of their rights, same-sex upl should pursue their happs through marryg their partner to crease their utily and pacy for achievement. Th, gay marriage would not only brg the social benefs of stable relatnships wh gays; would also help end much of the ignorance and social stigmata – and th the ostracism, btal vlence, and self-loathg associated wh homosexualy today.

And while most of the children were had heterosexual relatnships or marriag prr to “g out” a signifint number of gay and lbian upl are havg children through adoptn, operative parentg arrangement, and artificial sematn. Conveniently, many opponents of gay marriage ignore the fact that there are far more children dog well who are not beg raised by their natural mother and father an tact maral suatn than there are those languishg.

Advot of domtic partnerships and of the more radil step of legalizg gay marriage, argue, ntrast that the steps allow gay men and lbian to openly live the nservative liftyle of mted, monogamo upl. Important agments of society do not regnize same-genr relatnships and marriag and orr to monstrate their disagreement, wage battl the popular prs, legislative foms, and urts so that gay men and lbians n be prevented om havg the official permissn to marry. Moreover, the enuragement given to gay upl for them to bee stable and prospero would rult a bigger tax base which n later be utilized for the improvement of schools, streets and parks for the bigger number of heterosexual cizens (Alvear, 2003, p.

UTILARIANISM AND GAY MARRIAGE SAY

This is why due to the abnormaly of gay relatnships, the relig scholars and people who follow relign strictly oppose gay marriage and ask for the ethil nduct to be mataed by every human beg. Th, the supporters of gay marriage e this theory emphasizg that if the mixture of cultur, rac is allowed for the purpose of marriage then the homosexuals mt also have the same right to tie the knot if mak them happy and satisfied.

RSIAN NSTUTN CHANGE ENDS HOP FOR GAY MARRIAGE

Usg the theory of utilarianism, the ethil dilemma ncerng gay marriage is rolved really simply as enurag people to open their hearts and mds to allow two people of same-sex to get married if that is what mak them happy. It n also be nclud that those who follow the approach put forward by utilarianism are not really ncerned about the relign as they support the liberal bate regardg homosexual activy as an ethilly-permissible act and support s legalizatn. As far as my opn is ncerned, I strongly believe that gay marriage is an abnormal relatnship agast the nature and such associatns mt not be supported as they may brg immoral valu and uhil behavrs the people.

Socially, allowg gays to marry would support enurage secure, married life while disuragg the flamboyant and sometim promiscuo ge liftyle of some of the most oral homosexual active supporters and workers.

33 MAJOR PROS & CONS OF GAY MARRIAGE“GAY MARRIAGE ACCEPTANCE IS HAPPENG THE BLK OF AN EYE.”P. J. O’ROURKE, COMEDIANADVANTAG & DISADVANTAG OF GAY MARRIAGE

As a rult, gay marriage would not only brg the social benefs of steady relatnships wh gays; uld also support end most of the ignorance and social stigmata ” and th the ostracism, btal physil vlence, and self-loathg associated wh homosexualy today. And while most of the kids were acquired heterosexual relatnships or perhaps marriag prr to “g out a signifint range of gay and lbian upl are havg children through re-homg, operative parentg arrangement, and artificial sematn. Over the followg two s, gays(i thk they are sick) and saphic girls will not only earn the right to marry but will, jt like newly arrive immigrants, bee some of the strongt proponent of classic of tradnal fay prcipl.

Conveniently, a large number of opponents of gay maral life ignore the fact that there are a lot more children succeedg who are not beg raised by their natural mother and father wh an tact marriage suatn than there are those languishg.

Around the same time, an Ontar urtroom led that Canada’s maral life laws discrimated agast homosexuals; and rapidly afterward the Canadian Case proposed an ia legalize homosexual marriag. Advot of hoehold partnerships and of the more signifint step of legalizg homosexual marriage, argue, ntrast the particular steps allow gay guys and saphic girls to eely live the nservative way of life of dited, monogamo lovers.