—Filed an amic brief urgg the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold the crimalizatn of nsensual gay sex. In the brief, which he filed his pacy as Attorney General of Texas, he and fellows argued that a lg crimalizg gay sex “mt logilly extend to activi like prostutn, adultery, necrophilia, btialy, posssn of child pornography,
Contents:
- JUDGE WILLIAM PRYOR POSED NU FOR A GAY MAGAZE?
- POTENTIAL TMP SCOTUS PICK ARGUED STAT SHOULD BE ABLE TO CRIMALIZE GAY SEX
- DONALD TMP'S POTENTIAL SUPREME COURT JUDGE PICK THKS GAY PEOPLE SHOULD BE JAILED FOR HAVG SEX
JUDGE WILLIAM PRYOR POSED NU FOR A GAY MAGAZE?
It was wh some sense of irony, then, that November 2016, an old image purportedly showg William Pryor posg nu for a gay porn magaze as a young man was recirculated onle November 2016:. What’s more, he argued that stat should be able to prosecute gay people as crimals. The mor that Pryor once posed nu for a gay porn magaze origated wh a web se lled "Legal Schnzer" back 2013.
POTENTIAL TMP SCOTUS PICK ARGUED STAT SHOULD BE ABLE TO CRIMALIZE GAY SEX
And the sistence otherwise by the Commissn and the dissent reli on false stereotyp of gay dividuals.... But jt as a woman nnot rever unr Tle VII when she is fired bee of her heterosexualy, neher n a gay woman sue for discrimatn based on her sexual orientatn. Moreover, Pryor has advoted the view that the Constutn should not apply to some of the most cril issu pertag to dividual rights and eedoms — cludg reproductive choice, gay rights, and school prayer — and that the matters should be cid by the stat, based on majory vote, regardls of whether nstutnal rights are vlated.
Pryor would ny gay men and lbians the equal protectn of the laws. He believ that is nstutnal to imprison gay men and lbians for exprsg their sexualy the privacy of their own hom and has voluntarily filed an amic brief the Supreme Court urgg the Court to uphold a Texas law that crimaliz such private nsensual activy.
DONALD TMP'S POTENTIAL SUPREME COURT JUDGE PICK THKS GAY PEOPLE SHOULD BE JAILED FOR HAVG SEX
Dpe Supreme Court lgs to the ntrary, Pryor has exprsed the view that the Constutn should not apply to certa cril issu pertag to the rights and eedoms of dividual Amerins, such as reproductive choice, the civil rights of gay men and lbians, and relig liberty issu. Last year, the Court swept asi the vote of a majory of the people of Colorado to end any preferenc or special privileg for homosexuals their state. The urts have imposed rults on a wi range of issu, cludg racial quotas, school prayer, abortn, and homosexual rights.
Siarly, Pryor has lled important cisns by the Supreme Court applyg the Constutn to protect the equal rights of women (the Virgia Milary Instute se) and of gay men and lbians (Romer v. 620 (1996), for “overturn[g] the vote of the people of Colorado who amend their state nstutn to prohib special privileg or rights for homosexuals.