Gay Surrogacy - Surrogacy for LGBT Coupl |

Contents:

• GAY SURROGACY COSTS FOR LGBTQ PARENTS
• EVIL: GAY MEN REPORTEDLY HAVE THEIR BABY KILLED AFTER SURROGATE GETS BREAST CANCER
• CALIFORNIA MOV TO PROVI SURROGAT TO GAY MALE UPL THE NAME OF 'FERTILY EQUALY'
• GAY COUPLE DEMANDS SURROGATE MOTHER WH CANCER ABORT BABY
• THE SURROGACY OPTN: A GENERAL OVERVIEW FOR GAY COUPL
• DISVER ABOUTTHE GLANCEPRT EDNSUBSCRIBELOGNEWSCALIFORNIA INTRODUC NEW BILL THAT WOULD PROVI GAY COUPL A SURROGATE TO ACHIEVE "FERTILY EQUALY"
• GAY SURROGACY: EMPOWERG LGBTQ+ COUPL TO BUILD FAI
• SURROGACY FOR GAY COUPL MA EASY AND AFFORDABLE
• FDG THE PERFECT GAY-FRIENDLY SURROGACY AGENCY
• ‘WE ARE EXPECTED TO BE OK WH NOT HAVG CHILDREN’: HOW GAY PARENTHOOD THROUGH SURROGACY BEME A BATTLEGROUND
• GAY MEN AND SURROGACY

GAY SURROGACY COSTS FOR LGBTQ PARENTS

It’s val that you nsult wh a lawyer who specializ surrogacy for LGBTQIA+ upl and Rights and SurrogacyAlthough surrogacy for heterosexual tend parents and same-sex tend parents is largely siar, there are a few factors that make 's important to unrstand your rights as parents, and what the surrogacy laws are your state or untry, and the state which your surrogate Surrogacy is experienced providg legal guidance for gay and trans parents.

EVIL: GAY MEN REPORTEDLY HAVE THEIR BABY KILLED AFTER SURROGATE GETS BREAST CANCER

We were there every step of the way, tg and recg surrogat and egg donors exced to help gay men to bee dads, helpg our tend dads to talk to their kids and their support works about surrogacy, and even creatg solutns for HIV posive men to bee blogil fathers via surrogacy. ” Wh marriage equaly won years ago, they expected to be able to have a nventnal married months before their weddg, a targeted ad om an anisatn lled Gay Parents to Be land Maggipto’s Instagram feed, offerg ee nsultatns wh a fertily doctor who’d give them “the whole ndown” on how they uld start a fay. In England and Wal, the number of parents g a surrogate has quadpled over the past 10 years, but is always ntroversial: high-profile gay men om Brian Dowlg to Tom Daley have been acced of exploatn, “womb rental” and even “child abe” when they go public about creatg their fai wh a surrogate.

“If you balance the women who uld die pregnancy, the women who uld bee fertile bee of their eggs beg harvted, who mt endure pa and loss of time a way not mensurate to what they are beg paid, agast this new sire of a gay male uple to e surrogacy as their first optn, I thk the balance of sufferg is more on the female si. The clu, but are not necsarily limed to, recent velopments reproductive technology, changg legali the adoptn system, greater acceptance of lbians and gay men, and broar chang the diversy of Amerin fai (Gamson, 2015; Goldberg, 2010a, 2012; Goldberg, Downg, & Moyer, 2012; Stacey, 2006).

Alongsi their creasg visibily is a burgeong body of rearch on gay fathers, specifilly on the hort of gay men who beme parents after g out rather than the ntext of a prev heterosexual relatnship (see Berkowz & Marsigl, 2007; Carone, Bac, & Lgiardi, 2017; Goldberg, 2010a; Greenfeld & Seli, 2011; Lew, 2009; Petersen, 2018; Stacey, 2006).

CALIFORNIA MOV TO PROVI SURROGAT TO GAY MALE UPL THE NAME OF 'FERTILY EQUALY'

However, scholars are jt begng to unrstand the diversy of stctur, arrangements, and practic wh gay father-head fay nstellatns, as there are several paths to parenthood for this emergg hort—cludg domtic and ternatnal adoptn, fosterg, surrogacy arrangements, and creative kship ti that often entail sharg parentg wh a LGBQ woman or women. Developg a more nuanced unrstandg of gay fathers is necsary to better unrstand the unique fay experienc embedd wh each of the fay chapter provis an overview of the scholarship on one particularly unrstudied group of this new hort of gay fathers—gay men who have bee parents through the assistance of a surrogate mother.

I review the studi on gay fathers and surrogacy, explorg the ratnal behd men’s choice to nstct their fay g this pathway; the relatnships that velop between expectant fathers, surrogate mothers, and their children; and, fally, the nsequenc for fay formatn. Th, viewg gay fathers’ volvement wh their children through the lens illumat the fluidy of fay, genr, and of the work on sexual mory parentg has been spearhead by femist scholars who have long challenged “the iology of the monolhic fay and the notn that any one fay arrangement is natural, blogil, or functnal a timels way” (Goldberg & Allen, 2007, p. Takg serly the terlockg systems of privilege and opprsn the lived experienc of gay fathers who e surrogacy illumat how the men’s class, race, and Wtern privilege allows them to buy their way out of discrimatory adoptive polici and stake out a 9-month lease on a surrogate mother’s womb orr to nstct a geilly related, and sometim a geilly engeered, child (Dillaway, 2008) newer terdisciplary rearch has ground analys munitn, fay strs, and child velopment theori to nceptualize how gay men make cisns about surrogacy and to better unrstand the experience of surrogate fai for gay fathers and their children.

GAY COUPLE DEMANDS SURROGATE MOTHER WH CANCER ABORT BABY

For example, one study ed uncertaty rctn theory (URT), a amework that theoriz how munitn patterns among partners n be ed to rce uncertaty as they form imprsns wh one another and to explore how gay-tend fathers munited wh potential surrogate mothers and egg donors on an onle fom (May & Tenzek, 2016) of this new lerature has even moved beyond theorizg the surrogacy procs to clu thoughtful analys about the experienc of raisg children gay surrogate fai. Another study that explored the adjtment of children born to gay fathers through surrogacy ground their rearch a velopmental ntextual systems approach (Overton, 2015), whereby they examed children’s velopment terms of the bidirectnal relatns between the children, the fay, and the wir social world (Golombok et al., 2018) Fathers Usg SurrogacySurrogacy is an assisted reproductive technology (ART) which the prospective parent(s) fe a ntract wh a woman to rry their child (Bergman, Rub, Green, & Padron, 2010).

Moreover, g gtatnal surrogacy allows gay men to bypass fears that surrogat who are geilly related to the baby will be more attached to their baby and th more likely to change their mds about the arrangement—although of note is that there is no evince to support this. In a study of terviews wh gay fathers about their motivatns to pursue surrogacy, the overwhelmg majory (36 out of 40) opted for a gtatnal over geic surrogacy arrangement, and half of the men chose to do so bee they felt that there was a greater risk that the arrangement would fail if the surrogate had a geic lk to the baby (Blake et al., 2017).

THE SURROGACY OPTN: A GENERAL OVERVIEW FOR GAY COUPL

The other most popular reason gay men mentned for this choice was that gtatnal surrogacy was remend to them by their agency, a fdg that expos how the stutnalized attus of agenci n profoundly fluence gay men’s dividual cisn-makg around surrogacy (Blake et al., 2017) men’s experience wh the surrogacy procs is mediated by other stutns as well. G., the Amerin Psychologil Associatn, the Amerin Amy of Pediatrics, and others), the legal and terpersonal barriers that gay men and lbians face adoptg have been well documented by scholars (Brodzsky, Patterson, & Vaziri, 2002; see chapters “LGBTQ Adoptive Parents and Their Children” and “LGBTQ Foster Parents”). In addn, the Chigo Tribune recently missned and reported on an rmal survey of fertily clics nducted by FertilyIQ (a webse where patients asss their fertily physicians), which revealed that 10–20% of donor eggs are gog to gay men havg babi via gtatnal surrogacy (Schoenberg, 2016).

DISVER ABOUTTHE GLANCEPRT EDNSUBSCRIBELOGNEWSCALIFORNIA INTRODUC NEW BILL THAT WOULD PROVI GAY COUPL A SURROGATE TO ACHIEVE "FERTILY EQUALY"

Furthermore, the recent study that explored how gay-tend fathers ed classified ads on an onle muny created and mataed by surrogate mothers and tend parents, the thors noted that the number of gay men seekg the servic of surrogat on webs is on the rise (May & Tenzek, 2016).

Nohels, the body of rearch on gay fathers and surrogacy has documented a wi range of dimensns, cludg gay men’s motivatns for havg a child through surrogacy (Blake et al., 2017), the cisn-makg procs volved their path to parenthood (Blake et al., 2017), the transn to parenthood (Bergman et al., 2010; Greenfeld & Seli, 2011), relatnships wh potential and actual surrogat and egg donors (Carone et al., 2018; Greenfeld & Seli, 2011; May & Tenzek, 2016), cisns about disclosg rmatn about surrogat and donors to their children (Carone et al., 2018), the divisn of hoehold labor among bgeic and non-bgeic fathers (Tornello et al., 2015), parental adjtment (Van Rijn-van Gelren et al., 2018), children’s psychologil adjtment (Bac et al., 2015; Golombok et al., 2018; Green et al., 2015), sgle gay men and surrogacy (Carone et al., 2017), and gay men’s experienc wh transnatnal mercial surrogacy (Petersen, 2018). It is worth notg that a signifint strength of this rearch is that is beg produced by a diverse group of ternatnal scholars, cludg but not limed to the USA, the UK, the Netherlands, Spa, and addn to the studi is a handful of empiril qualative studi on gay fathers that have clud men who beme fathers through surrogacy their sampl (Berkowz, 2007; Berkowz & Marsigl, 2007; Mchell & Green, 2007; Ryan & Berkowz, 2009; Stacey, 2006).

Fally, although not empiril studi per se, Joshua Gamson, a soclogist, wrote about his own experience wh surrogacy his book, Morn Fai (2015), and Arlene Istar Lev (2006), a social worker, chronicled her experienc meetg and teractg wh gay fathers who have ed surrogacy. Prr to the recent rise of agenci like Growg Generatns () and Creative Fay Connectns () which are willg to work wh sgle gay men and gay upl, gay men were forced to fd surrogate mothers through placg ads newspapers or through other rmal channels like vg iends or fay members to serve as surrogat (Lev, 2006).

GAY SURROGACY: EMPOWERG LGBTQ+ COUPL TO BUILD FAI

This requir fancg the participatn of the egg donor, the servic of both an egg donor agency and a surrogate agency, IVF physician servic, and health surance to ver all high sts of surrogacy mean that is only an optn for a small number of relatively affluent gay men, a fact that is illtrated by the mographic posn of the participants any of the empiril studi that clud rmatn about e. In Petersen’s (2018) study of gay men Denmark who had ed transnatnal surrogacy, all were Whe, and a multatnal study nducted the UK, Denmark, and France, 96% of the Brish and Dutch parents were Whe (no race rmatn was llected on French parents) (Van Rijn-van Gelren et al., 2018) gay fathers the sampl are also different om gay men who bee parents through adoptn terms of their racial and ethnic diversy. Thkg About Parentg: Surrogacy as an OptnRearch has documented that gay men bee parents for many of the same reasons as heterosexual men: Both ce the sire for nurturg children, the nstancy of children their liv, the achievement of some sense of immortaly via children, and the sense of fay that children help to provi (Berkowz & Marsigl, 2007; Goldberg et al., 2012; Mallon, 2004).

SURROGACY FOR GAY COUPL MA EASY AND AFFORDABLE

However, the social and psychologil dimensns of gay men’s reproductive cisn-makg are addnally plited by ternalized homophobia, anxieti about raisg properly genred (and heterosexual) children, and stctural obstacl such as lack of rmatn and navigatg legal barriers (Berkowz & Marsigl, 2007; Bramen & Mchell, 2008; Goldberg, 2010a). Oftentim, those gay men who choose surrogacy are motivated by the higher gree of ntrol they have the procs when pared wh adoptn, feel that the prence of a geic lk to their child is an important factor for the creatn of fay ti, and worry about the psychologil strs a child may experience as a rult of beg adopted (Blake et al., 2017; Carone et al., 2017; Goldberg, 2010a; Lev, 2006).

It is th not surprisg that the prence of a geic relatnship is an oft-ced reason that gay men choose surrogacy (Lev, 2006) Fay Tree: Gay Fathers, Surrogate Mothers, Egg Donors, and Their ChildrenSurrogacy is siar to donor sematn (DI) that allows for one parent to be geilly related to the child, and volv a blogil “other” to provi the other half of the geic material. Where some gay fathers choose to fd out whose sperm actually impregnated the surrogate (or, many s, the egg donor), many others report creatively bypassg this issue by mixg their sperm before sematn and choose not to fd out whose sperm was ultimately rponsible for nceptn followg the birth of their child (Blake et al., 2017; Ryan & Berkowz, 2009) many, the cisn of whose sperm should be ed to impregnate the egg donor or surrogate is a signifint one.

However, future rearch is still need to see how gay men’s fai of orig relate to and bond wh children nceived and birthed through surrogacy, particularly those s where a father is unable to secure a blogil or legal relatnship to the Are the Surrogate Mother and/or Egg Donor? However, other rearch has revealed that as gay-prospective fathers evaluate their surrogat-to-be, they refully gate on the importance of racial and ethnic matchg, speculatg how addg another dimensn like racial differenc to their already publicly perplexg fay might nfe their child or encumber teractns wh cur terlopers (Boer, 2009; Ryan & Berkowz, 2009). Prospective fathers often nsir the extent to which they are willg to make what is already a nspicuo gay fay even more nspicuo by beg an terracial fay (Boer, 2009) separate choic about an egg donor and a gtatnal surrogate allows tend parents to choose among a wir pool of egg donors.

FDG THE PERFECT GAY-FRIENDLY SURROGACY AGENCY

Ehrenshaft (2005) argu that this modifitn is further magnified for those g assisted reproductive technologi sce the tend parents have spent months, even years, searchg for a donor or surrogate and drag fancial rourc payg for expensive gay men, this procs is further tensified sce they are not only limed by the reproductive lims of their bodi, but have been told by relig, polil, and cultural stutns that fatherhood.

In his terviews wh Whe Danish gay men about their experienc wh transnatnal surrogacy, Petersen (2018) observed that the men felt like they had ltle ntrol over the var obstacl the surrogacy procs, cludg the high numbers of failed IVF cycl, misrriag, and rapidly changg global Can We Tst Her?

Although the paradoxil notn of prence and absence n be expected any fay arrangement that reli on assisted reproductn or adoptn, is pecially evint gay father-head fai bee of the nstant societal remr that this third party was a necsy creatg their men who e gtatnal surrogacy are more likely to re about their possible future ntact wh the surrogate more so than the egg donor and are more likely to mata a relatnship wh her the future (Blake et al., 2017; Carone et al., 2018; Greenfeld & Seli, 2011). Moreover, while the basis of mercial surrogacy is a fancial arrangement, the reali are such that this is often a relatnship characterized by appreciatn, mutual rpect, and gratu, wh many gay fathers often fg ep bonds wh their surrogat (Mchell & Green, 2007) limed empiril rearch on gay fathers who have ed surrogacy suggts that they cultivate ways to share the pregnancy experience of their surrogate. Perhaps bee surrogacy volv a pregnancy that is trickier to hi, downplay, or ignore, rearch has found that pared wh other fai nstcted through assisted reproductive technologi, such as DI, fai formed through surrogacy are more open about the orig of their fay, regardls of parents’ sexual orientatn (Carone et al., 2017) example, one Amerin study, 83% of the gay fathers the sample had started the disclosure procs to their children by the time they were 5.

‘WE ARE EXPECTED TO BE OK WH NOT HAVG CHILDREN’: HOW GAY PARENTHOOD THROUGH SURROGACY BEME A BATTLEGROUND

The rt of the children exhibed some knowledge of their orig, and even though they did not explicly mentn a surrogate or egg donor, they were able to expla that their fathers need help creatg them (Carone et al., 2017) way that parents munite the uniquens of their fay to their children is by celebratg a child’s nceptn day addn to the child’s actual birthday, as this be an important date that gay fathers who created their fai though surrogacy are unique knowg (Mchell & Green, 2007). Future rearch is need on how children born to gay fathers and surrogate mothers negotiate domant two-parent heteronormative fay iology as they unrstand their fay stori and munite the stori to Fay Experience for Children and Their FathersLike all sexual mory parents, gay fathers who have nstcted their fai through surrogacy and their children mt ntend wh the “hegemonic shadow of the heterosexual paradigm” (Boer, 2009, p. For example, a recent Amerin study based on 40 gay father fai created through surrogacy and 55 lbian mother fai created through donor sematn asssed children’s adjtment g a batn of methods, cludg terviews, vio-rerd observatns, and standardized qutnnair, which were admistered to parents, children, and teachers (Golombok et al., 2018).

An Italian study found that gay father fai formed through surrogacy had siar parent-reported fay functng, emotnal regulatn, and adjtment of children when pared wh groups of lbian mother fai formed through donor sematn and heterosexual parent fai wh naturally nceived children (Bac et al., 2015). In a multatnal study that terrogated the differenc levels of parental well-beg between gay father fai wh fants born through surrogacy, lbian mother fai wh fants born through DI, and heterosexual parent fai wh fants born through IVF, the thors found that the gay fathers reported relatively levels of parental strs, anxiety, and prsn (Van Rijn-van Gelren et al., 2018) much of the rearch has revealed that gay men who bee parents g surrogacy experience siar life chang as heterosexual fathers, there are some notable differenc that likely arise om their sexual mory stat.

By creasg their ti to paid labor, creasg their prence the home, and dividg unpaid fay labor more evenly, the men challenge socially nstcted cultural narrativ that assume men are petent nurturers and that gay men are anti-fay and fdgs are not unique to those gay men who bee fathers through surrogacy. Clearly, although many gay fathers challenge stereotyp of men as primary regivers, many are also able to buy their way out of domticy, a fdg timately tied to both their class posn society and their abily as male-bodied parents to ntue to rely on the privilege granted to the tradnal father-as-breadwner stat.

GAY MEN AND SURROGACY

Moreover, bee surrogacy is only available to an enomilly privileged mory of gay men, seems reasonable to believe that a larger proportn of gay men who have bee fathers through surrogacy are more likely to outsource domtic help than those who beme fathers through adoptn, fosterg, or through kship ti.