What Each Supreme Court Jtice Has Said About Gay Marriage

Contents:

• WHAT EACH SUPREME COURT JTICE HAS SAID ABOUT GAY MARRIAGE
• GAY RIGHTS VS. FREE SPEECHSUPREME COURT BACKS WEB DIGNER OPPOSED TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE
• NEIL GORSUCH REMARKS DURG SUPREME COURT GAY RIGHTS CASE SPARK CONCERN
• WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT A SEEMGLY FAKE DOCUMENT A GAY RIGHTS CASE
• SUPREME COURT PROTECTS WEB SIGNER WHO WON’T DO GAY WEDDG WEBS

WHAT EACH SUPREME COURT JTICE HAS SAID ABOUT GAY MARRIAGE

Liberals are unrstandably cisn is an unequivol victory for those argug that protectg civil rights the workplace clus protectg gay and transgenr the big qutn is: How do a cidly nservative Supreme Court make a cidly liberal lg? While “policy arguments” to amend the law “are very weighty, Kavangh wrote, and while he agreed that “gay and lbian Amerins nnot be treated as social outsts or as ferr digny and worth” he uld not si wh Gorsuch’s terpretatn.

GAY RIGHTS VS. FREE SPEECHSUPREME COURT BACKS WEB DIGNER OPPOSED TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE

In orr to unrstand why Gorsuch’s statements are potentially problematic for the future of same-sex marriage, we first have to unrstand the nnectn between the Constutn’s protectn of that right and the legal doctre that paved the way for —the ia that the Constutn protects dividual choice matters of timacy for gay and straight people alike.

” Jtice Slia raised much the same qutn Lawrence, ntendg that “State laws agast bigamy, gay marriage, adult ct, prostutn, masturbatn, adultery, fornitn, btialy, and obsceny” are all at risk if we take serly what Jtice Slia rid as Casey’s “famed sweet-mystery-of-life passage. Part of what is ncerng here is the nflatn of gay marriage, which is central to the fay life of gay and lbian people, and practic like btialy, which should be prohibed. Given his cricism of personal tonomy protectns and his votn of Slia’s dissent Lawrence, he should also be asked whether he would overturn the Lawrence cisn, a move that uld eventually open the door to new laws agast gay sex.

Gorsuch’s affy wh the views of his adviser Fnis on natural law, his approvg catn of Slia’s views on gay marriage, and his skepticism of the Court’s jurispnce on the right to chose matters of personal timacy all suggt that he might vote to reverse the cisn protectg same-sex marriage.

NEIL GORSUCH REMARKS DURG SUPREME COURT GAY RIGHTS CASE SPARK CONCERN

Defenrs of gay rights have reason to worry that he would roll back the clock on this important issue, and senators should e the upg nfirmatn heargs to fd out om Gorsuch exactly where he stands. Rights lgs the urt’s history, protectg gay and transgenr people om workplace discrimatn and nfoundg those who thought he would be a reliable nservative on those issu. Jtice Gorsuch led a 6-to-3 majory clarg that gay and transgenr workers are protected by Tle VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibs discrimatn based on race, relign, natnal orig and sex.

WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT A SEEMGLY FAKE DOCUMENT A GAY RIGHTS CASE

”His ncln: “An employer who fir an dividual for beg homosexual or transgenr fir that person for tras or actns would not have qutned members of a different sex. Hodg, the 2015 se that tablished a nstutnal right to same-sex Jtice Kennedy retired 2018, gay rights advot said they feared that the urt was ls likely to support their e.

Instead he wrote an opn that was immediately hailed by gay and transgenr rights groups as a landmark his opn, Jtice Gorsuch employed a fundamentally nservative prciple — a leral readg of the words of a statute — to reach a cisn that ntrasts sharply wh the nclns of the other nservative jtic on the a dissent, Jtice Samuel A. And the Epispal church he attend liberal Boulr, Colo., before g to Washgton weled gay Goodbm relled 2017 how he scribed himself to Jtice Gorsuch, at the time a judge on the Uned Stat Court of Appeals for the 10th Circu, durg an terview for a clerkship 2008: “I said, ‘Listen, I’m a liberal gay Jew om New England and you were appoted by Gee W.

Tmp picked Jtice Gorsuch for the urt, some of those gay iends and former clerks predicted that would be difficult to pigeonhole his legal approach to the issue of gay rights when he beme a jtice. Few liberal groups paid much attentn, engagg a fierce effort to keep him off the Legal, a gay rights anizatn, posted a statement January 2017 wh the headle “Neil Gorsuch Has an Unacceptable, Hostile Rerd Towards L. Roberts has sce voted several tim support of the regnn of gay marriage and agast the discrimatn of same-sex 2020, when the Supreme Court led that Tle VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects LGBTQ Amerins om workplace discrimatn, the nservative jtice was among the 6 to 3 same year, the Supreme Court apparently unanimoly rejected an appeal om a former Kentucky unty clerk who refed to provi marriage licens to same-sex upl based on her relig beliefs Miller v.

SUPREME COURT PROTECTS WEB SIGNER WHO WON’T DO GAY WEDDG WEBS

But all Amerins, whatever their thkg on that issue, should worry about what the majory's claim of power portends, " Alo wrote, nouncg that all those who disagreed wh gay marriage ran the risk of "beg labeled as bigots. "One year later, he nomated Jtice Sonia 2015, when the Supreme Court was lg over Obergefell and approachg the qutn of whether allowg same-sex marriage nstuted a threat to dividual liberty, Sotomayor volly fend gay marriage, sayg: "I'm sorry. "Sotomayor was among the jtic who 2020 voted to expand Tle VII of the Civil Rights Act to clu gay and transgenr employe a cisn that was brought forward by three s—Bostock v.

Elenis, sayg that her objectn would not be based on the stat of the same-sex uple, but stead, on the msage that the bsperson did not want to send through their qutn isn't the "who, " but the "what, " Gorsuch said on Has Amy Coney Barrett Said About Gay Marriage?

ImageLorie Smh said her Christian fah requir her to turn away ctomers seekg servic to celebrate same-sex Woolf for The New York TimThe Supreme Court sid on Friday wh a web signer Colorado who said she had a First Amendment right to refe to sign weddg webs for same-sex upl spe a state law that forbids discrimatn agast gay people. ’”The se, though amed as a clash between ee speech and gay rights, was the latt a seri of cisns favor of relig people and groups, notably nservative cisn also appeared to suggt that the rights of L.